Respondents' evaluations of a CV survey: a case study based on an economic valuation of the Wildlife Enhancement Scheme, Pevensey Levels in East Sussex

Summary Environmental economists have developed a methodology for eliciting individual preferences by asking respondents to a contingent valuation survey how much they would be willing to pay for specified environmental ‘goods’. Contingent valuation generates considerable debate, not least because it is unclear how people arrive at a monetary value or whether the elicited monetary value bears any relation to how individuals actually value the environmental ‘good’. In this paper, we present preliminary results from a qualitative study of how respondents construct their responses to a CV survey, to suggest that the methodology does not measure what it purports to measure.

[1]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Valuing the Environment through Contingent Valuation , 1994 .

[2]  N. Hanley,et al.  Preferences, information and biodiversity preservation , 1995 .

[3]  Sabine U. O'Hara,et al.  Discursive ethics in ecosystems valuation and environmental policy , 1996 .

[4]  Jacquelin Burgess,et al.  Exploring Environmental Values through the Medium of Small Groups: 1. Theory and Practice , 1988 .

[5]  J. Bowers.  A conspectus on valuing the environment , 1993 .

[6]  M. Sagoff.  Four Dogmas of Environmental Economics , 1994, Environmental Values.

[7]  Jacquelin Burgess,et al.  Social Constructions of Nature: A Case Study of Conflicts over the Development of Rainham Marshes , 1994 .

[8]  Jonathan Aldred,et al.  Existence Value, Welfare and Altruism , 1994 .

[9]  J. Hausman,et al.  Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number? , 1994 .

[10]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .

[11]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Value elicitation: Is there anything in there? , 1991 .

[12]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction , 1992 .

[13]  John O'Neill,et al.  Ecology, Policy and Politics: Human Well-Being and the Natural World , 1993 .

[14]  J. Payne,et al.  How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions: A Verbal Protocol Analysis of Willingness to Pay for an Environmental Regulation , 1994 .

[15]  Jacquelin Burgess,et al.  Exploring Environmental Values through the Medium of Small Groups: 2. Illustrations of a Group at Work , 1988 .

[16]  Jacquelin Burgess,et al.  Rationalizing environmental responsibilities: A comparison of lay publics in the UK and the Netherlands , 1996 .

[17]  M. Sagoff,et al.  The Economy of the Earth: The Allocation and Distribution of Resources , 2007 .

[18]  P. Healey.  The Communicative Turn in Planning Theory and its Implications for Spatial Strategy Formation , 1996 .

[19]  Contested meanings: the consumption of news about nature conservation , 1991 .

[20]  M. O'Connor,et al.  What is the Value of Rangitoto Island? , 1994, Environmental Values.

[21]  M. Pauly,et al.  Universal health insurance in the Clinton plan: coverage as a tax-financed public good. , 1994, The journal of economic perspectives : a journal of the American Economic Association.