Peak flux performance and microbial removal by selected membrane bioreactor systems.

A pilot study was conducted over a period of 18 months at the Point Loma Wastewater Treatment Plant (PLWWTP) in San Diego, CA to evaluate the operational and water quality performance of six selected membrane bioreactor (MBR) systems at average and peak flux operation. Each of these systems was operated at peak flux for 4 h a day for six consecutive days to assess peak flux performance. Virus seeding studies were also conducted during peak flux operation to assess the capability of these systems to reject MS-2 coliphage. When operating at steady state, these MBR systems achieved an effluent BOD concentration of <2 mg/L and a turbidity of <0.1 NTU. Peak flux for the MBR systems ranged from 56 to 76 L/m2/h (liters per square meter per hour) with peaking factors in the range of 1.5-3.2. When switching from average to peak flux operation, a reversible drop of 22-32% in temperature-corrected permeability was observed for all submerged MBR systems. The percent drop in permeability increased as MLSS concentration in the membrane tank increased from 11,100 mg/L to 15,300 mg/L and was observed to be highest for the system operating at highest MLSS concentration. Such trends were not observed with an external MBR system. Each MBR system was able to sustain a 4-h-a-day peak flow for six consecutive days with only moderate membrane fouling. The membrane fouling was quantified by measuring the drop in temperature-corrected permeability. This drop ranged from 13 to 33% over six days for different submerged MBR systems. The MBR systems achieved microbial removal in the range of 5.8-6.9 logs for total coliform bacteria, >5.5 to >6.0 logs for fecal coliform bacteria and 2.6 to >3.4 logs for indigenous MS-2 coliphages. When operating at peak flux, seeded MS-2 coliphage removal ranged from 1.0 to 4.4 logs, respectively. The higher log removal values (LRVs) for indigenous MS-2 coliphage among different MBR systems were probably the result of particle association of indigenous coliphage. Differences in membrane pore size (0.04-0.2 microm) amongst the MBR systems evaluated did not have a substantial impact on indigenous MS-2 coliphage removal, but seeded MS-2 coliphage removal varied among the different MBR systems.

[1]  B. Bucher,et al.  Treating Wet Weather Flows in a Membrane Bioreactor: Changes in Mixed Liquor Properties cannot be Neglected , 2006 .

[2]  A. Fane,et al.  Particle deposition during membrane filtration of colloids: transition between concentration polarization and cake formation , 1997 .

[3]  Bruce O. Mansell,et al.  COMPARISON OF TWO MEMBRANE BIOREACTORS AND AN ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT WITH DUAL-MEDIA FILTRATION: NUTRIENT AND PRIORITY POLLUTENTS REMOVALS , 2004 .

[4]  B. Lesjean,et al.  Evaluation of a novel flat sheet MBR filtration system , 2009 .

[5]  Samer Adham,et al.  Performance Investigation of Membrane Bioreactor Systems During Municipal Wastewater Reclamation , 2007, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[6]  Bruce O. Mansell,et al.  CHLORINATION DISINFECTION REQUIREMENTS FOR MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR PERMEATE , 2007 .

[7]  Chii Shang,et al.  Bacteriophage MS-2 removal by submerged membrane bioreactor. , 2005, Water research.

[8]  A. Siitonen,et al.  Elimination of enteric bacteria in biological-chemical wastewater treatment and tertiary filtration units. , 2003, Water research.

[9]  D. W. Smith,et al.  Removal of coliphages in secondary effluent by microfiltration-mechanisms of removal and impact of operating parameters. , 2004, Water research.

[10]  Joan B. Rose,et al.  Removal of pathogenic and indicator microorganisms by a full-scale water reclamation facility , 1996 .

[11]  M. Pidou,et al.  A study of the microbial quality of grey water and an evaluation of treatment technologies for reuse , 2008 .

[12]  Tatsuki Ueda,et al.  Fate of indigenous bacteriophage in a membrane bioreactor , 2000 .

[13]  Anthony G. Fane,et al.  Virus removal from water and wastewater using membranes , 1995 .

[14]  Seoktae Kang,et al.  Positive roles of biofilm during the operation of membrane bioreactor for water reuse , 2007 .

[15]  Min Yang,et al.  Virus removal performance and mechanism of a submerged membrane bioreactor , 2005, Process Biochemistry.

[16]  K. Farahbakhsh,et al.  Removal of native coliphages and coliform bacteria from municipal wastewater by various wastewater treatment processes: implications to water reuse. , 2007, Water research.

[17]  B Björlenius,et al.  Removal of viruses, parasitic protozoa and microbial indicators in conventional and membrane processes in a wastewater pilot plant. , 2006, Water research.