Meta-heuristic approach to proportional fairness

Proportional fairness is a concept from resource sharing tasks among n users, where each user receives at least 1/n of her or his total value of the infinitely divisible resource. Here we provide an approach to proportional fairness that allows its extension to discrete domains, as well as for the direct application of evolutionary computation to approximate proportional fair states. We employ the concept of relational optimization, where the optimization task becomes the finding of extreme elements of a binary relation, and define a proportional fairness relation correspondingly. By using a rank-ordered version of proportional fairness, the so-called ordered proportional fairness, we can improve the active finding of maximal proportional fair elements by evolutionary meta-heuristic algorithms. This is demonstrated by using modified versions of the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm (version 2, SPEA2) and multi-objective particle swarm optimization. In comparison between proportional and ordered proportional fairness, and by using relational SPEA2, the evolved maximum sets of ordered proportional fairness achieve 10 % more dominance cases against a set of random vectors than proportional fairness.

[1]  J. Periaux,et al.  Evolutionary Methods for Design, Optimization and Control with Applications to Industrial Problems , 2001 .

[2]  M Reyes Sierra,et al.  Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimizers: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art , 2006 .

[3]  Laurent Massoulié,et al.  A queueing analysis of max-min fairness, proportional fairness and balanced fairness , 2006, Queueing Syst. Theory Appl..

[4]  Mario Köppen,et al.  Meta-heuristic optimization reloaded , 2011, 2011 Third World Congress on Nature and Biologically Inspired Computing.

[5]  H. Boche,et al.  Nash Bargaining and Proportional Fairness for Wireless Systems , 2009, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[6]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Data Networks , 1986 .

[7]  David W. Corne,et al.  Quantifying the Effects of Objective Space Dimension in Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization , 2007, EMO.

[8]  K. Suzumura Rational choice, collective decisions, and social welfare: Notes , 1983 .

[9]  D. K. Subramanian,et al.  Fairness in processor scheduling in time sharing systems , 1991, OPSR.

[10]  Jeffrey M. Jaffe,et al.  Bottleneck Flow Control , 1981, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[11]  Yuji Oie,et al.  Fairness-Based Global Optimization of User-Centric Networks , 2009, 2009 Fifth International Joint Conference on INC, IMS and IDC.

[12]  A. Sen,et al.  Collective Choice and Social Welfare , 2017 .

[13]  Wlodzimierz Ogryczak,et al.  Inequality measures and equitable locations , 2009, Ann. Oper. Res..

[14]  Lishan Kang,et al.  A New Evolutionary Algorithm for Solving Many-Objective Optimization Problems , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[15]  Marco Laumanns,et al.  SPEA2: Improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm , 2001 .

[16]  Rachel Wells Hall,et al.  Submajorization and the Geometry of Unordered Collections , 2012, Am. Math. Mon..

[17]  R. Srikant,et al.  Short-term fairness and long-term QoS in the Internet , 2010, Perform. Evaluation.

[18]  Mario Köppen,et al.  Comparison of Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms for the utilization of fairness in network control , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[19]  James F. Kurose,et al.  An information-theoretic characterization of weighted α-proportional fairness in network resource allocation , 2011, Inf. Sci..

[20]  Tobias Harks,et al.  Congestion control in utility fair networks , 2008, Comput. Networks.

[21]  Eytan Modiano,et al.  Wireless channel allocation using an auction algorithm , 2006, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[22]  W. Stromquist How to Cut a Cake Fairly , 1980 .

[23]  Jie Li,et al.  Cooperative proportional fairness scheduling for wireless transmissions , 2009, IWCMC.

[24]  Adam Wierzbicki,et al.  A multi-criteria approach to fair and efficient bandwidth allocation , 2008 .

[25]  Adam Wierzbicki,et al.  Fair resource allocation schemes and network dimensioning problems , 2003 .

[26]  Mario Köppen,et al.  Unsorting the Proportional Fairness Relation , 2011, 2011 Third International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems.

[27]  Mario Marchese,et al.  Integration of pricing models between best-effort and guaranteed performance services in telecommunication networks , 2003 .

[28]  Frank Kelly,et al.  Charging and rate control for elastic traffic , 1997, Eur. Trans. Telecommun..