Quantification of the effects of VRN1 and Ppd-D1 to predict spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) heading time across diverse environments

Heading time is a major determinant of the adaptation of wheat to different environments, and is critical in minimizing risks of frost, heat, and drought on reproductive development. Given that major developmental genes are known in wheat, a process-based model, APSIM, was modified to incorporate gene effects into estimation of heading time, while minimizing degradation in the predictive capability of the model. Model parameters describing environment responses were replaced with functions of the number of winter and photoperiod (PPD)-sensitive alleles at the three VRN1 loci and the Ppd-D1 locus, respectively. Two years of vernalization and PPD trials of 210 lines (spring wheats) at a single location were used to estimate the effects of the VRN1 and Ppd-D1 alleles, with validation against 190 trials (~4400 observations) across the Australian wheatbelt. Compared with spring genotypes, winter genotypes for Vrn-A1 (i.e. with two winter alleles) had a delay of 76.8 degree days (°Cd) in time to heading, which was double the effect of the Vrn-B1 or Vrn-D1 winter genotypes. Of the three VRN1 loci, winter alleles at Vrn-B1 had the strongest interaction with PPD, delaying heading time by 99.0 °Cd under long days. The gene-based model had root mean square error of 3.2 and 4.3 d for calibration and validation datasets, respectively. Virtual genotypes were created to examine heading time in comparison with frost and heat events and showed that new longer-season varieties could be heading later (with potential increased yield) when sown early in season. This gene-based model allows breeders to consider how to target gene combinations to current and future production environments using parameters determined from a small set of phenotyping treatments.

[1]  James W. Jones,et al.  The DSSAT cropping system model , 2003 .

[2]  Andrew J. Millar,et al.  Prediction of Photoperiodic Regulators from Quantitative Gene Circuit Models , 2009, Cell.

[3]  Xinyou Yin,et al.  The role of ecophysiological models in QTL analysis: the example of specific leaf area in barley , 1999, Heredity.

[4]  K. Chenu,et al.  Breeding for the future: what are the potential impacts of future frost and heat events on sowing and flowering time requirements for Australian bread wheat (Triticum aestivium) varieties? , 2012, Global change biology.

[5]  J. Dubcovsky,et al.  Mapping of a thermo-sensitive earliness per se gene on Triticum monococcum chromosome 1Am , 2002, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[6]  Stephen M. Welch,et al.  A Genetic Neural Network Model of Flowering Time Control in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2003 .

[7]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Evaluating Plant Breeding Strategies by Simulating Gene Action and Dryland Environment Effects , 2003, Agronomy Journal.

[8]  J. Dubcovsky,et al.  Wheat flowering repressor VRN2 and promoter CO2 compete for interactions with NUCLEAR FACTOR-Y complexes. , 2011, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[9]  D. Laurie,et al.  Mutation at the circadian clock gene EARLY MATURITY 8 adapts domesticated barley (Hordeum vulgare) to short growing seasons , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  L. Yan,et al.  Allelic variation at the VRN-1 promoter region in polyploid wheat , 2004, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[11]  Pierre Martre,et al.  Under what circumstances can process-based simulation models link genotype to phenotype for complex traits? Case-study of fruit and grain quality traits. , 2010, Journal of experimental botany.

[12]  Jeffrey W. White,et al.  Improving Physiological Assumptions Of Simulation Models By Using Gene‐Based Approaches , 2003 .

[13]  M. Semenov,et al.  Simulation of environmental and genotypic variations of final leaf number and anthesis date for wheat , 2012 .

[14]  J. Bennetzen,et al.  The Wheat VRN2 Gene Is a Flowering Repressor Down-Regulated by Vernalization , 2004, Science.

[15]  J. Hanan,et al.  Computational analysis of flowering in pea (Pisum sativum). , 2009, The New phytologist.

[16]  J. Dubcovsky,et al.  Regulation of VRN-1 Vernalization Genes in Normal and Transgenic Polyploid Wheat1 , 2005, Plant Physiology.

[17]  Paul D. Shaw,et al.  Natural variation in a homolog of Antirrhinum CENTRORADIALIS contributed to spring growth habit and environmental adaptation in cultivated barley , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[18]  P. Jamieson,et al.  Sirius: a mechanistic model of wheat response to environmental variation , 1998 .

[19]  Senthold Asseng,et al.  An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation , 2003 .

[20]  John R. Porter,et al.  A winter wheat crop simulation model without water or nutrient limitations , 1984, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[21]  J. Snape,et al.  Waiting for fine times: genetics of flowering time in wheat , 2001, Euphytica.

[22]  Jianjun Tang,et al.  Model analysis of flowering phenology in recombinant inbred lines of barley. , 2005, Journal of experimental botany.

[23]  Jeffrey W. White,et al.  Simulating effects of genes for physiological traits in a process-oriented crop model , 1996 .

[24]  Jeffrey W. White,et al.  Simulation-based analysis of effects of Vrn and Ppd loci on flowering in wheat , 2008 .

[25]  K. Cane,et al.  The flow of alleles of important photoperiod and vernalisation genes through Australian wheat. , 2009 .

[26]  K. Cane,et al.  Photoperiod and vernalization gene effects in southern Australian wheat , 2010 .

[27]  Xinyou Yin,et al.  Coupling estimated effects of QTLs for physiological traits to a crop growth model: predicting yield variation among recombinant inbred lines in barley , 2000, Heredity.

[28]  B. Trevaskis,et al.  Veery wheats carry an allele of Vrn‐A1 that has implications for freezing tolerance in winter wheats , 2011 .

[29]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[30]  R. Uptmoor,et al.  Prediction of flowering time in Brassica oleracea using a quantitative trait loci-based phenology model. , 2011, Plant biology.

[31]  J. Veyrieras,et al.  Deciphering the genetics of flowering time by an association study on candidate genes in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) , 2011, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[32]  P. Hayes,et al.  Large deletions within the first intron in VRN-1 are associated with spring growth habit in barley and wheat , 2005, Molecular Genetics and Genomics.

[33]  B. Trevaskis,et al.  MADS box genes control vernalization-induced flowering in cereals , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  R. Richards,et al.  Influence of ‘historic’ photoperiod during stem elongation on the number of fertile florets in wheat , 2003, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[35]  James W. Jones,et al.  A Gene‐Based Model to Simulate Soybean Development and Yield Responses to Environment , 2006 .

[36]  R. L. Bernard,et al.  Modeling Genetic Effects on the Photothermal Response of Soybean Phenological Development , 2003, Agronomy Journal.

[37]  G. Slafer,et al.  Pre-anthesis development and number of fertile florets in wheat as affected by photoperiod sensitivity genes Ppd-D1and Ppd-B1 , 2006, Euphytica.

[38]  D. Brunel,et al.  FT genome A and D polymorphisms are associated with the variation of earliness components in hexaploid wheat , 2008, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[39]  G. Hammer,et al.  Simulating the Yield Impacts of Organ-Level Quantitative Trait Loci Associated With Drought Response in Maize: A “Gene-to-Phenotype” Modeling Approach , 2009, Genetics.

[40]  Sukumar Chakraborty,et al.  Plant adaptation to climate change—opportunities and priorities in breeding , 2012, Crop and Pasture Science.

[41]  A. Graner,et al.  Induced mutations in circadian clock regulator Mat-a facilitated short-season adaptation and range extension in cultivated barley , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  J. Kervella,et al.  Analysing the genetic control of peach fruit quality through an ecophysiological model combined with a QTL approach. , 2005, Journal of experimental botany.

[43]  D. Laurie,et al.  A Pseudo-Response Regulator is misexpressed in the photoperiod insensitive Ppd-D1a mutant of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) , 2007, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[44]  W. Anderson,et al.  Variability of optimum sowing time for wheat yield in Western Australia , 2008 .

[45]  H. Rawson,et al.  Sensitivity of wheat phasic development to major environmental factors: a re-examination of some assumptions made by physiologists and modellers , 1994 .

[46]  Pierre Martre,et al.  The quantitative response of wheat vernalization to environmental variables indicates that vernalization is not a response to cold temperature. , 2012, Journal of experimental botany.

[47]  J. Yamagishi,et al.  Flowering response of rice to photoperiod and temperature: a QTL analysis using a phenological model , 2005, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[48]  B. Timbal,et al.  A review of recent climate variability and climate change in southeastern Australia , 2008 .

[49]  Stephen M. Welch,et al.  A Genetic Neural Network Model of Flowering Time Control in , 2003 .