Chapter 8 Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods: A Tool for Assessing River Ecosystem Health Using Functional Macroinvertebrate Traits

Publisher Summary Macroinvertebrate communities are widely used for assessing river-ecosystem health, and this has led to the development of a large amount of indices. Functional diversity analysis has already proved useful in the study of aquatic ecosystems. Assessment techniques have been developed using the distribution of macroinvertebrate functional groups across the physical heterogeneity of streams and rivers, instead of taxonomical analysis. Thus, observations focus on spatial and temporal modifications of ecological traits and, eventually, they can be used to determine ecosystem attribute surrogates. The use of invertebrate traits to determine the most common running-water ecosystem attributes has been introduced recently and has been successfully adopted for the assessment of river oxbows in Florida. This chapter applies Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods to river functionality assessment to generate information and to provide further understanding as a basis for river-restoration strategies.

[1]  Sylvain Dolédec,et al.  Species traits for future biomonitoring across ecoregions: patterns along a human-impacted river , 1999 .

[2]  Jean Pierre Brans,et al.  Multicriteria decision making: A case study , 1991 .

[3]  G. Minshall,et al.  Stream Ecosystem Dynamics of the Salmon River, Idaho: An 8th-Order System , 1992, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[4]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Redefinition and Elaboration of River Ecosystem Health: Perspective for River Management , 2006 .

[5]  C. Townsend,et al.  Species traits in relation to a habitat templet for river systems , 1994 .

[6]  J. M. Hellawell Biological indicators of freshwater pollution and environmental management , 1986 .

[7]  J. Karr Biological Integrity: A Long-Neglected Aspect of Water Resource Management. , 1991, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[8]  B. Statzner,et al.  Perspectives for biomonitoring at large spatial scales: a unified measure for the functional composition of invertebrate communities in European running waters , 2001 .

[9]  S. Dolédec,et al.  Comparison of structural and functional approaches to determining landuse effects on grassland stream invertebrate communities , 2006, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[10]  B. Mogensen,et al.  Pesticide leaching assessment method for ranking both single substances and scenarios of multible substance use , 1998 .

[11]  Rainer Brüggemann,et al.  An algebraic/graphical tool to compare ecosystems with respect to their pollution IV: Comparative regional analysis by boolean arithmetics , 1999 .

[12]  A. Huryn,et al.  Length-Mass Relationships for Freshwater Macroinvertebrates in North America with Particular Reference to the Southeastern United States , 1999, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[13]  J. B. Wallace,et al.  Long‐term recovery of a mountain stream from clear‐cut logging: the effects of forest succession on benthic invertebrate community structure , 1998 .

[15]  D. M. Rosenberg,et al.  Freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. , 1994 .

[16]  J. R. Karr,et al.  Restoring life in running waters , 1998 .

[17]  Per Nyström,et al.  Crayfish predation on the common pond snail (Lymnaea stagnalis): the effect of habitat complexity and snail size on foraging efficiency , 1998, Hydrobiologia.

[18]  B. Statzner,et al.  Invertebrate traits for the biomonitoring of large European rivers: an initial assessment of trait patterns in least impacted river reaches , 2005 .

[19]  A. Ghilarov,et al.  Ecosystem functioning and intrinsic value of biodiversity. , 2000 .

[20]  A. Smilde,et al.  Multicriteria decision making , 1992 .

[21]  E. Meyer,et al.  The relationship between body length parameters and dry mass in running water invertebrates , 1989, Archiv für Hydrobiologie.

[22]  P. Reich,et al.  Allometric Equations for Estimation of Ash-free Dry Mass from Length Measurements for Selected European Earthworm Species (Lumbricidae) in the Western Great Lakes Region , 2004 .

[23]  C. Veltman,et al.  Predicting dry weight of New Zealand aquatic macroinvertebrates from linear dimensions , 1994 .

[24]  A Newman,et al.  Ranking pesticides by environmental impact. , 1995, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  K. Cummins,et al.  Development and application of a macroinvertebrate functional-group approach in the bioassessment of remnant river oxbows in southwest Florida , 2002, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[26]  R. Brüggemann,et al.  Ranking of aquatic effect tests using hasse diagrams , 1997 .

[27]  R. Stoffels,et al.  Length‐mass models for some common New Zealand littoral‐benthic macroinvertebrates, with a note on within‐taxon variability in parameter values among published models , 2003 .

[28]  Peter Burgherr,et al.  Regression analysis of linear body dimensions vs. dry mass in stream macroinvertebrates , 1997 .

[29]  S. Pudenz,et al.  An algebraic/graphical tool to compare ecosystems with respect to their pollution by PB/CD III: Comparative regional analysis by applying a similarity index , 1998 .

[30]  K. Cummins,et al.  Structure and Function of Stream Ecosystems , 1974 .

[31]  B. Malmqvist Aquatic invertebrates in riverine landscapes , 2002 .

[32]  C. Ryan,et al.  Stream Restoration and Enhancement Projects: Is Anyone Monitoring? , 2002, Environmental management.