Sex differences in geometry of the femoral neck with aging: A structural analysis of bone mineral data

SummaryThe greater hip fracture rate among elderly women is generally ascribed to differences in femoral neck strength between the sexes. Strength of a given bone is a function of both its material properties and the magnitudes of mechanical stresses within it. This study examined the hypothesis that these apparent strength differences between the sexes are due to dissimilarities in the restructuring of the femoral neck with age, which result in higher stresses in elderly women. Using Hip Strength Analysis, a computer program developed by the authors, femoral neck cross-sectional geometric properties for stress analyses were derived from bone mineral image data of 409 community living, white subjects ranging from 19 to 93 years of age. Though both sexes show declines in femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) and cross-sectional area with age, only females show a decline in the cross-sectional moment of inertia (CSMI, a geometric index of bone rigidity). The lack of decline in male CSMI appears to be a result of a small but significant increase in femoral neck girth. Similar age-related changes have been observed in the femoral shaft by others. The net effect of these observed changes is that mechanical stresses in the femoral neck of females appear to increase at three times the rate per decade of those of males. These results lend support to the hypothesis that the higher fracture rate in elderly women is due, at least in part, to elevated levels of mechanical stress, resulting from a combination of greater bone loss and less compensatory geometric restructuring with age.

[1]  G U Rao,et al.  Predicting femoral neck strength from bone mineral data. A structural approach. , 1990, Investigative radiology.

[2]  R. Martin,et al.  Age and sex-related changes in the structure and strength of the human femoral shaft. , 1977, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  Friedrich Pauwels,et al.  Biomechanics of the Normal and Diseased Hip , 1976 .

[4]  M Martens,et al.  Aging of bone tissue: mechanical properties. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  B. Riggs,et al.  Epidemiology of fractures of the proximal femur in Rochester, Minnesota. , 1980, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  H W Wahner,et al.  Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal femur and spine with aging. Differences between the postmenopausal and senile osteoporosis syndromes. , 1982, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[7]  R. Mazess,et al.  Influence of age and body weight on spine and femur bone mineral density in U.S. white men , 1990, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[8]  W C Hayes,et al.  Subperiosteal expansion and cortical remodeling of the human femur and tibia with aging. , 1982, Science.

[9]  Johnson,et al.  Changes in Bone Mineral Density of the Proximal Femur and Spine with Aging DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE POSTMENOPAUSAL ANDSENILE OSTEOPOROSIS , 2022 .

[10]  Martin Rb,et al.  Senile osteoporosis. The effects of exercise. , 1984 .

[11]  Yeater Ra,et al.  Senile osteoporosis. The effects of exercise. , 1984, Postgraduate medicine.

[12]  W. Hayes,et al.  Sex differences in age‐related remodeling of the femur and tibia , 1988, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[13]  J. F. Williams,et al.  Prediction of the strength of the neck of femur from its radiological appearance. , 1975, Biomedical engineering.

[14]  H. Bohr,et al.  Bone mineral content of femoral bone and the lumbar spine measured in women with fracture of the femoral neck by dual photon absorptiometry. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  Richmond W. Smith,et al.  Femoral Expansion in Aging Women: Implications for Osteoporosis and Fractures , 1964, Science.