Crowded Minds : The Implicit Bystander Effect

Five studies merged the priming methodology with the bystander apathy literature and demonstrate how merely priming a social context at Time 1 leads to less helping behavior on a subsequent, completely unrelated task at Time 2. In Study 1, participants who imagined being with a group at Time 1 pledged significantly fewer dollars on a charity-giving measure at Time 2 than did those who imagined being alone with one other person. Studies 2-5 build converging evidence with hypothetical and real helping behavior measures and demonstrate that participants who imagine the presence of others show facilitation to words associated with unaccountable on a lexical decision task. Implications for social group research and the priming methodology are discussed.

[1]  C. Neil Macrae,et al.  HELP, I NEED SOMEBODY: AUTOMATIC ACTION AND INACTION , 1998 .

[2]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  Behavioral Implications of Information Presented Outside of Conscious Awareness: The Effect of Subliminal Presentation of Trait Information on Behavior in the Prisoner's Dilemma Game , 1988 .

[3]  J. Bargh,et al.  Individual construct accessibility, person memory, and the recall-judgment link: The case of information overload. , 1985 .

[4]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Data analysis in social psychology. , 1998 .

[5]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[6]  B. Fehr,et al.  An Exploration of the Relational Schemata Underlying Attachment Styles: Self-Report and Lexical Decision Approaches , 1993 .

[7]  S. Duval,et al.  A theory of objective self awareness , 1972 .

[8]  R. D. Clark,et al.  Where is the apathetic bystander? Situational characteristics of the emergency. , 1974 .

[9]  R. J. Boik.  Contrasts and Effect Sizes in Behavioral Research: A Correlational Approach , 2001 .

[10]  B. Latané,et al.  The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn't He Help? , 1972 .

[11]  Mary E. Losch,et al.  Attributions of Responsibility for Helping and Doing Harm: Evidence for Confusion of Responsibility , 1986 .

[12]  Douglas Austrom,et al.  Diffusion of Responsibility in Charitable Donations , 1983 .

[13]  Mark W. Baldwin,et al.  Relational Schemas and Cognition in Close Relationships , 1995 .

[14]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Automatic Stereotyping: Category, Trait, and Behavioral Activations , 2002 .

[15]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. , 2000 .

[16]  M. R. Laner,et al.  Bystander Attitudes Toward Victims of Violence: Who's Worth Helping? , 2001 .

[17]  C. Carver,et al.  Modeling: An analysis in terms of category accessibility. , 1983 .

[18]  D. Rubin,et al.  Contrasts and Effect Sizes in Behavioral Research , 1999 .

[19]  Bibb Latané,et al.  Field studies of altruistic compliance. , 1970 .

[20]  Mark H. Davis,et al.  Empathy, expectations, and situational preferences: personality influences on the decision to participate in volunteer helping behaviors. , 1999, Journal of personality.

[21]  Thomas Gilovich,et al.  Just Going Along: Nonconscious Priming and Conformity to Social Pressure , 1999 .

[22]  B. Latané,et al.  Bystander intervention in emergencies: diffusion of responsibility. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  C. Korte.  Effects of Individual Responsibility and Group Communication on Help-giving in an Emergency , 1971 .

[24]  Deborah A. Prentice,et al.  Pluralistic Ignorance and the Perpetuation of Social Norms by Unwitting Actors , 1996 .

[25]  Mark W. Baldwin,et al.  Primed Relational Schemas as a Source of Self-Evaluative Reactions , 1994 .

[26]  B. Latané,et al.  Ten years of research on group size and helping Psychological Bulletin Vol 89 , 1981 .

[27]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  A. van Knippenberg,et al.  The relation between perception and behavior, or how to win a game of trivial pursuit. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  J. Bargh,et al.  Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait construct and stereotype-activation on action. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  Ap Dijksterhuis,et al.  Reflecting and Assimilation and contrast in impression formation and automatic behavior. , 2001 .

[31]  W. S. Rholes,et al.  Category accessibility and impression formation , 1977 .

[32]  B. Fehr,et al.  Social-cognitive conceptualization of attachment working models : Availability and accessibility effects , 1996 .

[33]  H. Markus.  Self-schemata and processing information about the self. , 1977 .

[34]  J. Baron,et al.  Limiting the Scope of Moral Obligations to Help , 2000 .

[35]  B. Latané,et al.  Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  L. Bickman.  Social influence and diffusion of responsibility in an emergency , 1972 .

[37]  J. Darley,et al.  Do groups always inhibit individuals responses to potential emergencies? , 1973, Journal of personality and social psychology.