English L1 and L2 Speakers' Knowledge of Lexical Bundles.

The purpose of the present study is to contribute to the ongoing debate about the use of lexical bundles by first (L1 ) and second language (L2) speakers of English. The study consists of two experiments that examined whether L1 and L2 English speakers displayed any knowledge of lexical bundles as holistic units and whether their knowledge was affected by the discourse function of the lexical bundles (discourse-organizing or referential). The participants in Experiment 1 (N = 61) completed a gap-filling activity, whereas the participants in Experiment 2 (N = 61) carried out a dictation task. Results showed that the participants' knowledge differed for specific lexical bundles and that, overall, they knew more discourse-organizing bundles than referential bundles. The implications of the study are discussed in terms of current research about the role of frequency-based language chunks in L1 and L2 speech processing in English.

[1]  Anna Mauranen,et al.  "It`s just real messy": the occurrence and function of just in a corpus of academic speech , 2001 .

[2]  D. Lancker,et al.  Comprehension of familiar phrases by left- but not by right-hemisphere damaged patients , 1987, Brain and Language.

[3]  Viviana Cortes.  Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology , 2004 .

[4]  Diana Van Lancker-Sidtis,et al.  Tracking the incidence of formulaic expressions in everyday speech: methods for classification and verification , 2004 .

[5]  J. House.  Developing Pragmatic Fluency in English as a Foreign Language: Routines and Metapragmatic Awareness , 1996, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[6]  D. Biber,et al.  If you look at …: Lexical Bundles in University Teaching and Textbooks , 2004 .

[7]  F. Coulmas.  On the sociolinguistic relevance of routine formulae , 1979 .

[8]  Britt Erman,et al.  Cognitive processes as evidence of the idiom principle , 2007 .

[9]  Viviana Cortes,et al.  Teaching lexical bundles in the disciplines: An example from a writing intensive history class , 2006 .

[10]  S. Fotos.  The Cloze Test as an Integrative Measure of EFL Proficiency: A Substitute for Essays on College Entrance Examinations?* , 1991 .

[11]  K. Hakuta.  PREFABRICATED PATTERNS AND THE EMERGENCE OF STRUCTURE IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION1 , 1974 .

[12]  Z. Dörnyei,et al.  Knowledge and acquisition of formulaic sequences: A longitudinal study , 2004 .

[13]  David A. Wood.  Uses and Functions of Formulaic Sequences in Second-Language Speech: An Exploration of the Foundations of Fluency , 2006 .

[14]  James Dean Brown,et al.  Relative Merits of Four Methods for Scoring Cloze Tests , 1980 .

[15]  A. Wray.  Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: principle and practice , 2000 .

[16]  C. A. Ferguson.  The structure and use of politeness formulas , 1976 .

[17]  Martha A. Jones,et al.  Facilitating the acquisition of formulaic sequences: An exploratory study in an EAP context , 2004 .

[18]  Muriel Warga,et al.  “Je serais très merciable”: Formulaic vs. Creatively Produced Speech in Learners’ Request-Closings , 2005 .

[19]  Susan Conrad,et al.  Will Corpus Linguistics Revolutionize Grammar Teaching in the 21st Century , 2000 .

[20]  Alison Wray,et al.  The functions of formulaic language: an integrated model , 2000 .

[21]  Shinichi Izumi.  OUTPUT, INPUT ENHANCEMENT, AND THE NOTICING HYPOTHESIS , 2002, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[22]  Merrill Swain,et al.  Immersion Education: From semantic to syntactic processing: How can we promote it in the immersion classroom? , 1997 .

[23]  Raymond W. Gibbs,et al.  How to kick the bucket and not decompose: Analyzability and idiom processing , 1989 .

[24]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The access and processing of idiomatic expressions , 1979 .

[25]  R. Gibbs,et al.  Syntactic frozenness in processing and remembering idioms , 1985, Cognition.

[26]  M. Sasaki.  Effects of cultural schemata on students' test-taking processes for cloze tests: a multiple data source approach , 2000 .

[27]  D. Rubin,et al.  Comparing Effect Sizes of Independent Studies , 1982 .