A Novel Framework Based on FastICA for High Density Surface EMG Decomposition

This study presents a progressive FastICA peel-off (PFP) framework for high-density surface electromyogram (EMG) decomposition. The novel framework is based on a shift-invariant model for describing surface EMG. The decomposition process can be viewed as progressively expanding the set of motor unit spike trains, which is primarily based on FastICA. To overcome the local convergence of FastICA, a peel-off strategy, i.e., removal of the estimated motor unit action potential trains from the previous step, is used to mitigate the effects of the already identified motor units, so more motor units can be extracted. A constrained FastICA is applied to assess the extracted spike trains and correct possible erroneous or missed spikes. These procedures work together to improve decomposition performance. The proposed framework was validated using simulated surface EMG signals with different motor unit numbers (30, 70, 91) and SNRs (20, 10, and 0 dB). The results demonstrated relatively large numbers of extracted motor units and high accuracies (high F1-scores). The framework was tested with 111 trials of 64-channel electrode array experimental surface EMG signals during the first dorsal interosseous muscle contraction at different intensities. On average 14.1 ±5.0 motor units were identified from each trial of experimental surface EMG signals.

[1]  Dario Farina,et al.  Covariance and Time-Scale Methods for Blind Separation of Delayed Sources , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Ze Wang Fixed-point algorithms for constrained ICA and their applications in fMRI data analysis. , 2011, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[3]  Éric Gaussier,et al.  A Probabilistic Interpretation of Precision, Recall and F-Score, with Implication for Evaluation , 2005, ECIR.

[4]  Damjan Zazula,et al.  Multichannel Blind Source Separation Using Convolution Kernel Compensation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[5]  Ping Zhou,et al.  MUAP Number Estimates in Surface EMG: Template-Matching Methods and Their Performance Boundaries , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  A Holobar,et al.  Non-invasive characterization of motor unit behaviour in pathological tremor , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[7]  R. Merletti,et al.  Accuracy assessment of CKC high-density surface EMG decomposition in biceps femoris muscle , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[8]  C. D. De Luca Decomposition of the EMG signal into constituent motor unit action potentials. , 1995, Muscle & nerve.

[9]  Hideo Nakamura,et al.  The application of independent component analysis to the multi-channel surface electromyographic signals for separation of motor unit action potential trains: part I-measuring techniques. , 2004, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[10]  G. Baumgartner,et al.  Human alpha motoneurone discharge, a statistical analysis. , 1974, Brain Research.

[11]  Erkki Oja,et al.  Independent Component Analysis , 2001 .

[12]  J. Fang,et al.  Decomposition of multiunit electromyographic signals , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Bert U Kleine,et al.  Using two-dimensional spatial information in decomposition of surface EMG signals. , 2007, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[14]  C. D. De Luca,et al.  High-yield decomposition of surface EMG signals , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[15]  Dario Farina,et al.  Influence of anatomical, physical, and detection-system parameters on surface EMG , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[16]  J. Stephens,et al.  Synchronization of motor unit activity during voluntary contraction in man. , 1990, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  D. Farina,et al.  Estimating motor unit discharge patterns from high-density surface electromyogram , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[18]  D. Winter,et al.  Models of recruitment and rate coding organization in motor-unit pools. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  R. Okuno,et al.  A decomposition algorithm for surface electrode-array electromyogram , 2005, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[20]  Xiaoyan Li,et al.  Alterations in the Peak Amplitude Distribution of the Surface Electromyogram Poststroke , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  Joshua C Kline,et al.  Statistically rigorous calculations do not support common input and long-term synchronization of motor-unit firings. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  Jacques Duchêne,et al.  A model of EMG generation , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  Martin Descarreaux,et al.  Influence of contraction strength on single motor unit synchronous activity , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[24]  D.W. Stashuk,et al.  Probabilistic inference-based classification applied to myoelectric signal decomposition , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  J. Wertsch,et al.  Quantitative electromyography. , 2003, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[26]  G Rau,et al.  From cell to movement: to what answers does EMG really contribute? , 2004, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[27]  D. Farina,et al.  Experimental Analysis of Accuracy in the Identification of Motor Unit Spike Trains From High-Density Surface EMG , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[28]  D. Stashuk,et al.  Automatic decomposition of selective needle-detected myoelectric signals , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  Hossein Parsaei,et al.  EMG Signal Decomposition Using Motor Unit Potential Train Validity , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[30]  Kevin C. McGill,et al.  EMGLAB: An interactive EMG decomposition program , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[31]  B Mambrito,et al.  A technique for the detection, decomposition and analysis of the EMG signal. , 1984, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[32]  Hossein Parsaei,et al.  Intramuscular EMG signal decomposition. , 2010, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[33]  T Nishida,et al.  Effects of temperature on motor unit action potentials during isometric contraction , 1995, Muscle & nerve.

[34]  Ronald S. Lefever,et al.  A Procedure for Decomposing the Myoelectric Signal Into Its Constituent Action Potentials - Part I: Technique, Theory, and Implementation , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[35]  Toshio Moritani,et al.  Motor unit firing pattern of vastus lateralis muscle in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients , 2013, Muscle & nerve.

[36]  A. Taylor,et al.  The significance of grouping of motor unit activity , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[37]  Madeleine M. Lowery,et al.  Effect of Extracellular Potassium Accumulation on Muscle Fiber Conduction Velocity: A Simulation Study , 2009, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[38]  Petros Maragos,et al.  On amplitude and frequency demodulation using energy operators , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[39]  K C McGill,et al.  Automatic decomposition of multichannel intramuscular EMG signals. , 2009, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[40]  Roberto Merletti,et al.  Advances in surface EMG: recent progress in detection and processing techniques. , 2010, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[41]  Joshua C Kline,et al.  Decomposition of surface EMG signals from cyclic dynamic contractions. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[42]  George S. Moschytz,et al.  A software package for the decomposition of long-term multichannel EMG signals using wavelet coefficients , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[43]  Kevin C. McGill,et al.  High-Resolution Alignment of Sampled Waveforms , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[44]  Dario Farina,et al.  Decoding the neural drive to muscles from the surface electromyogram , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[45]  George S. Moschytz,et al.  High-precision EMG signal decomposition using communication techniques , 2000, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[46]  D F Stegeman,et al.  A thin, flexible multielectrode grid for high-density surface EMG. , 2004, Journal of applied physiology.

[47]  Damjan Zazula,et al.  An approach to surface EMG decomposition based on higher-order cumulants , 2005, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[48]  Ronald S. Lefever,et al.  A Procedure for Decomposing the Myoelectric Signal Into Its Constituent Action Potentials-Part II: Execution and Test for Accuracy , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[49]  G. H. Loudon,et al.  New signal processing techniques for the decomposition of EMG signals , 1992, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[50]  Fabian J. Theis,et al.  On the use of sparse signal decomposition in the analysis of multi-channel surface electromyograms , 2006, Signal Process..

[51]  Armando Malanda-Trigueros,et al.  Automated decomposition of intramuscular electromyographic signals , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[52]  D Farina,et al.  Blind source identification from the multichannel surface electromyogram , 2014, Physiological measurement.

[53]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  A Model-Based Spike Sorting Algorithm for Removing Correlation Artifacts in Multi-Neuron Recordings , 2013, PloS one.

[54]  Christopher J. James,et al.  Temporally constrained ICA: an application to artifact rejection in electromagnetic brain signal analysis , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[55]  Marco Santello,et al.  Common input to motor units of digit flexors during multi-digit grasping. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[56]  D. Zazula,et al.  Correlation-based decomposition of surface electromyograms at low contraction forces , 2004, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[57]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  A new and fast approach towards sEMG decomposition , 2012, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[58]  R. Merletti,et al.  Modeling of surface myoelectric signals. I. Model implementation , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[59]  Carlo J De Luca,et al.  Decomposition of indwelling EMG signals. , 2008, Journal of applied physiology.

[60]  D. Cj Decomposition of the EMG signal into constituent motor unit action potentials. , 1995 .

[61]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis , 1999, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[62]  D W Stashuk,et al.  Decomposition and quantitative analysis of clinical electromyographic signals. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[63]  Hideo Nakamura,et al.  The application of independent component analysis to the multi-channel surface electromyographic signals for separation of motor unit action potential trains: part II-modelling interpretation. , 2004, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[64]  Yannick Deville,et al.  Differential Fast Fixed-Point Algorithms for Underdetermined Instantaneous and Convolutive Partial Blind Source Separation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[65]  Zeynep Erim,et al.  Decomposition of Intramuscular EMG Signals Using a Heuristic Fuzzy Expert System , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[66]  Damjan Zazula,et al.  Real-Time Motor Unit Identification From High-Density Surface EMG , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[67]  Kevin C. McGill,et al.  Optimal resolution of superimposed action potentials , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.