Effect of altered sensory conditions on multivariate descriptors of human postural sway

Abstract Multivariate descriptors of sway were used to test whether altered sensory conditions result not only in changes in amount of sway but also in postural coordination. Eigenvalues and directions of eigenvectors of the covariance of shnk and hip angles were used as a set of multivariate descriptors. These quantities were measured in 14 healthy adult subjects performing the Sensory Organization test, which disrupts visual and somatosensory information used for spatial orientation. Multivariate analysis of variance and discriminant analysis showed that resulting sway changes were at least bivariate in character, with visual and somatosensory conditions producing distinct changes in postural coordination. The most significant changes were found when somatosensory information was disrupted by sway-referencing of the support surface (P=3.2·10−10). The resulting covariance measurements showed that subjects not only swayed more but also used increased hip motion analogous to the hip strategy. Disruption of vision, by either closing the eyes or sway-referencing the visual surround, also resulted in altered sway (P=1.7·10−10), with proportionately more motion of the center of mass than with platform sway-referencing. As shown by discriminant analysis, an optimal univariate measure could explain at most 90% of the behavior due to altered sensory conditions. The remaining 10%, while smaller, are highly significant changes in posture control that depend on sensory conditions. The results imply that normal postural coordination of the trunk and legs requires both somatosensory and visual information and that each sensory modality makes a unique contribution to posture control. Descending postural commands are multivariate in nature, and the motion at each joint is affected uniquely by input from multiple sensors.

[1]  C. Assaiante,et al.  A statistical approach to sensorimotor strategies: conjugate cross-correlations. , 1994, Journal of motor behavior.

[2]  K. Barin Dynamic posturography: analysis of error in force plate measurement of postural sway , 1992, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[3]  H E Rockette,et al.  Normal subject postural sway during the Romberg test. , 1982, American journal of otolaryngology.

[4]  A. Kuo A least-squares estimation approach to improving the precision of inverse dynamics computations. , 1998, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[5]  T Mergner,et al.  Vestibular-neck interaction and transformation of sensory coordinates. , 1997, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[6]  J Dichgans,et al.  The contribution of vestibulo-spinal mechanisms to the maintenance of human upright posture. , 1989, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[7]  F O Black,et al.  Clinical application of dynamic posturography for evaluating sensory integration and vestibular dysfunction. , 1990, Neurologic clinics.

[8]  F B Horak,et al.  Effect of galvanic vestibular stimulation on human postural responses during support surface translations. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  A. C. Rencher,et al.  Assessing the contribution of individual variables following rejection of a multivariate hypothesis , 1990 .

[10]  Richard B. Stein Control of Movement , 1980 .

[11]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1983 .

[12]  F Honegger,et al.  Differential control of leg and trunk muscle activity by vestibulo-spinal and proprioceptive signals during human balance corrections. , 1995, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[13]  L R Young,et al.  Optimal estimator model for human spatial orientation. , 1988, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[14]  J. D. Mollon,et al.  Control of eye movements , 1977, Nature.

[15]  S. P. Evseev,et al.  The Control of Movement , 1996 .

[16]  Marjorie H. Woollacott,et al.  Aging and Posture Control: Changes in Sensory Organization and Muscular Coordination , 1986, International journal of aging & human development.

[17]  F O Black,et al.  Age-related changes in human posture control: sensory organization tests. , 1990, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[18]  Audra E. Kosh,et al.  Linear Algebra and its Applications , 1992 .

[19]  L. Young,et al.  A multidimensional model of the effect of gravity on the spatial orientation of the monkey. , 1993, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[20]  H C Diener,et al.  On the role of vestibular, visual and somatosensory information for dynamic postural control in humans. , 1988, Progress in brain research.

[21]  F E Zajac,et al.  Human standing posture: multi-joint movement strategies based on biomechanical constraints. , 1993, Progress in brain research.

[22]  L. Rowell,et al.  Exercise : regulation and integration of multiple systems , 1996 .

[23]  D. Robinson Control of eye movements , 1981 .

[24]  F. O. Black,et al.  Adaptation to altered support and visual conditions during stance: patients with vestibular deficits , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[25]  A. C. Rencher Methods of multivariate analysis , 1995 .

[26]  F. Horak,et al.  Central programming of postural movements: adaptation to altered support-surface configurations. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Laurence R. Young,et al.  Optimal Estimator Model for Human Spatial Orientation a , 1988 .

[28]  J. Furman,et al.  Posturography: uses and limitations. , 1994, Bailliere's clinical neurology.

[29]  N Accornero,et al.  Clinical multisegmental posturography: age-related changes in stance control. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[30]  B. E. Maki,et al.  Fear of falling and postural performance in the elderly. , 1991, Journal of gerontology.