Deep Learning Based Noise Reduction for Brain MR Imaging: Tests on Phantoms and Healthy Volunteers

Purpose: To test whether our proposed denoising approach with deep learning-based reconstruction (dDLR) can effectively denoise brain MR images. Methods: In an initial experimental study, we obtained brain images from five volunteers and added different artificial noise levels. Denoising was applied to the modified images using a denoising convolutional neural network (DnCNN), a shrinkage convolutional neural network (SCNN), and dDLR. Using these brain MR images, we compared the structural similarity (SSIM) index and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) between the three denoising methods. Two neuroradiologists assessed the image quality of the three types of images. In the clinical study, we evaluated the denoising effect of dDLR in brain images with different levels of actual noise such as thermal noise. Specifically, we obtained 2D-T2-weighted image, 2D-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and 3D-magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition with gradient echo (MPRAGE) from 15 healthy volunteers at two different settings for the number of image acquisitions (NAQ): NAQ2 and NAQ5. We reconstructed dDLR-processed NAQ2 from NAQ2, then compared with SSIM and PSNR. Two neuroradiologists separately assessed the image quality of NAQ5, NAQ2 and dDLR-NAQ2. Statistical analysis was performed in the experimental and clinical study. In the clinical study, the inter-observer agreement was also assessed. Results: In the experimental study, PSNR and SSIM for dDLR were statistically higher than those of DnCNN and SCNN (P < 0.001). The image quality of dDLR was also superior to DnCNN and SCNN. In the clinical study, dDLR-NAQ2 was significantly better than NAQ2 images for SSIM and PSNR in all three sequences (P < 0.05), except for PSNR in FLAIR. For all qualitative items, dDLR-NAQ2 had equivalent or better image quality than NAQ5, and superior quality to that of NAQ2 (P < 0.05), for all criteria except artifact. The inter-observer agreement ranged from substantial to near perfect. Conclusion: dDLR reduces image noise while preserving image quality on brain MR images.

[1]  Daiju Ueda,et al.  Deep Learning for MR Angiography: Automated Detection of Cerebral Aneurysms. , 2019, Radiology.

[2]  L. Sugrue,et al.  Hybrid 3D/2D Convolutional Neural Network for Hemorrhage Evaluation on Head CT , 2018, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[3]  Ganesh Adluru,et al.  Validation of highly accelerated real‐time cardiac cine MRI with radial k‐space sampling and compressed sensing in patients at 1.5T and 3T , 2018, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  Takashi Ida,et al.  Deep Shrinkage Convolutional Neural Network for Adaptive Noise Reduction , 2018, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[5]  E. Kohmura,et al.  Focal hyperintensity in the dorsal brain stem of patients with cerebellopontine angle tumor: A high-resolution 3 T MRI study , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[6]  Tao Tan,et al.  Denoising of 3D magnetic resonance images with multi-channel residual learning of convolutional neural network , 2017, Japanese Journal of Radiology.

[7]  S. Choi,et al.  Improving Arterial Spin Labeling by Using Deep Learning. , 2017, Radiology.

[8]  Tao Liu,et al.  Searching for prostate cancer by fully automated magnetic resonance imaging classification: deep learning versus non-deep learning , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[9]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  3D convolutional neural network for automatic detection of lung nodules in chest CT , 2017, Medical Imaging.

[10]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Beyond a Gaussian Denoiser: Residual Learning of Deep CNN for Image Denoising , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[11]  Bradley J. Erickson,et al.  Automated Segmentation of Hyperintense Regions in FLAIR MRI Using Deep Learning , 2016, Tomography.

[12]  Han Liu,et al.  Identify the Atrophy of Alzheimer’s Disease, Mild Cognitive Impairment and Normal Aging Using Morphometric MRI Analysis , 2016, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[13]  Mohammad Kayvanrad,et al.  Diagnostic quality assessment of compressed sensing accelerated magnetic resonance neuroimaging , 2016, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  Leslie Ying,et al.  Accelerating magnetic resonance imaging via deep learning , 2016, 2016 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[15]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[16]  M. Inglese,et al.  Ultra-High-Field MRI Visualization of Cortical Multiple Sclerosis Lesions with T2 and T2*: A Postmortem MRI and Histopathology Study , 2015, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[17]  Snehashis Roy,et al.  Association of Cortical Lesion Burden on 7-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Cognition and Disability in Multiple Sclerosis. , 2015, JAMA neurology.

[18]  A. Cherubini,et al.  3‐T magnetic resonance imaging simultaneous automated multimodal approach improves detection of ambiguous visual hippocampal sclerosis , 2015, European journal of neurology.

[19]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[20]  M. Thom Review: Hippocampal sclerosis in epilepsy: a neuropathology review , 2014, Neuropathology and applied neurobiology.

[21]  Jeroen van der Grond,et al.  Increased number of microinfarcts in Alzheimer disease at 7-T MR imaging. , 2013, Radiology.

[22]  T. Aso,et al.  Internal structural changes in the hippocampus observed on 3-tesla MRI in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. , 2013, Internal medicine.

[23]  Maria Thom,et al.  Hippocampal sclerosis—Origins and imaging , 2012, Epilepsia.

[24]  M. Kitajima,et al.  Partial loss of hippocampal striation in medial temporal lobe epilepsy: pilot evaluation with high-spatial-resolution T2-weighted MR imaging at 3.0 T. , 2009, Radiology.

[25]  Andrea Bernasconi,et al.  Small focal cortical dysplasia lesions are located at the bottom of a deep sulcus. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[26]  Alessandro Foi,et al.  Image Denoising by Sparse 3-D Transform-Domain Collaborative Filtering , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[27]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  A Review of Image Denoising Algorithms, with a New One , 2005, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[28]  David L. Donoho,et al.  De-noising by soft-thresholding , 1995, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[29]  M. J. McDonnell Box-filtering techniques , 1981 .