WEBnm@ v2.0: Web server and services for comparing protein flexibility

BackgroundNormal mode analysis (NMA) using elastic network models is a reliable and cost-effective computational method to characterise protein flexibility and by extension, their dynamics. Further insight into the dynamics–function relationship can be gained by comparing protein motions between protein homologs and functional classifications. This can be achieved by comparing normal modes obtained from sets of evolutionary related proteins.ResultsWe have developed an automated tool for comparative NMA of a set of pre-aligned protein structures. The user can submit a sequence alignment in the FASTA format and the corresponding coordinate files in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) format. The computed normalised squared atomic fluctuations and atomic deformation energies of the submitted structures can be easily compared on graphs provided by the web user interface. The web server provides pairwise comparison of the dynamics of all proteins included in the submitted set using two measures: the Root Mean Squared Inner Product and the Bhattacharyya Coefficient. The Comparative Analysis has been implemented on our web server for NMA, WEBnm@, which also provides recently upgraded functionality for NMA of single protein structures. This includes new visualisations of protein motion, visualisation of inter-residue correlations and the analysis of conformational change using the overlap analysis. In addition, programmatic access to WEBnm@ is now available through a SOAP-based web service. Webnm@ is available at http://apps.cbu.uib.no/webnma.ConclusionWEBnm@ v2.0 is an online tool offering unique capability for comparative NMA on multiple protein structures. Along with a convenient web interface, powerful computing resources, and several methods for mode analyses, WEBnm@ facilitates the assessment of protein flexibility within protein families and superfamilies. These analyses can give a good view of how the structures move and how the flexibility is conserved over the different structures.

[1]  Gennady M Verkhivker,et al.  Allosteric Regulation of the Hsp90 Dynamics and Stability by Client Recruiter Cochaperones: Protein Structure Network Modeling , 2014, PloS one.

[2]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Nonlinear elasticity, proteinquakes, and the energy landscapes of functional transitions in proteins , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  B. Brooks,et al.  Probing the local dynamics of nucleotide-binding pocket coupled to the global dynamics: myosin versus kinesin. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[4]  Ataur R. Katebi,et al.  The critical role of the loops of triosephosphate isomerase for its oligomerization, dynamics, and functionality , 2014, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[5]  Nathalie Reuter,et al.  Comparing the intrinsic dynamics of multiple protein structures using elastic network models. , 2015, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[6]  G. Schulz,et al.  Induced-fit movements in adenylate kinases. , 1990, Faraday discussions.

[7]  I. Bahar,et al.  Coarse-grained normal mode analysis in structural biology. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[8]  Thomas L. Rodgers,et al.  Modulation of Global Low-Frequency Motions Underlies Allosteric Regulation: Demonstration in CRP/FNR Family Transcription Factors , 2013, PLoS biology.

[9]  I. Stoica.  Characterization of protein matrix motions in the Rb. sphaeroides photosynthetic reaction center , 2006, Journal of molecular modeling.

[10]  Jhih-Wei Chu,et al.  On the roles of substrate binding and hinge unfolding in conformational changes of adenylate kinase. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[11]  M. Karplus,et al.  A hierarchy of timescales in protein dynamics is linked to enzyme catalysis , 2007, Nature.

[12]  K. Hinsen.  Analysis of domain motions by approximate normal mode calculations , 1998, Proteins.

[13]  V. Pande,et al.  Can conformational change be described by only a few normal modes? , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[14]  Ivet Bahar,et al.  Anisotropic network model: systematic evaluation and a new web interface , 2006, Bioinform..

[15]  C. Micheletti.  Comparing proteins by their internal dynamics: exploring structure-function relationships beyond static structural alignments. , 2012, Physics of life reviews.

[16]  Nathalie Reuter,et al.  Principal component and normal mode analysis of proteins; a quantitative comparison using the GroEL subunit , 2011, Proteins.

[17]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Allosteric transitions in the chaperonin GroEL are captured by a dominant normal mode that is most robust to sequence variations. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[18]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Insights into protein flexibility: The relationship between normal modes and conformational change upon protein–protein docking , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  A. Carriquiry,et al.  Close correspondence between the motions from principal component analysis of multiple HIV-1 protease structures and elastic network modes. , 2008, Structure.

[20]  A. Samson,et al.  Elastic network normal mode dynamics reveal the GPCR activation mechanism , 2014, Proteins.

[21]  James O. Wrabl,et al.  Conformational heterogeneity within the LID domain mediates substrate binding to Escherichia coli adenylate kinase: function follows fluctuations. , 2013, Topics in current chemistry.

[22]  K. Hinsen,et al.  Transconformations of the SERCA1 Ca-ATPase: a normal mode study. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[23]  Hongyu Miao,et al.  The interplay of structure and dynamics: Insights from a survey of HIV‐1 reverse transcriptase crystal structures , 2013, Proteins.

[24]  Peter Lackner,et al.  Accuracy analysis of multiple structure alignments , 2009, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[25]  M. Karplus,et al.  Collective motions in proteins: A covariance analysis of atomic fluctuations in molecular dynamics and normal mode simulations , 1991, Proteins.

[26]  Moon Ki Kim,et al.  KOSMOS: a universal morph server for nucleic acids, proteins and their complexes , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[27]  Julián Echave,et al.  Why are the low-energy protein normal modes evolutionarily conserved? , 2012 .

[28]  Mark Gerstein,et al.  Normal mode analysis of macromolecular motions in a database framework: Developing mode concentration as a useful classifying statistic , 2002, Proteins.

[29]  Julian Echave,et al.  Exploring the common dynamics of homologous proteins. Application to the globin family. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[30]  A. Amadei,et al.  On the convergence of the conformational coordinates basis set obtained by the essential dynamics analysis of proteins' molecular dynamics simulations , 1999, Proteins.

[31]  Bharat V. Adkar,et al.  Dynamic coupling between the LID and NMP domain motions in the catalytic conversion of ATP and AMP to ADP by adenylate kinase. , 2010, The Journal of chemical physics.

[32]  George N Phillips,et al.  Evaluating elastic network models of crystalline biological molecules with temperature factors, correlated motions, and diffuse x-ray scattering. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[33]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  Structural and Biochemical Characterization of the Cop9 Signalosome CSN5/CSN6 Heterodimer , 2014, PloS one.

[34]  D. Kern,et al.  Dynamic personalities of proteins , 2007, Nature.

[35]  Adam W Van Wynsberghe,et al.  Conservation and variation of structural flexibility in protein families. , 2010, Structure.

[36]  Hiroshi Wako,et al.  Ligand-induced conformational change of a protein reproduced by a linear combination of displacement vectors obtained from normal mode analysis. , 2011, Biophysical chemistry.

[37]  D. Zerbino,et al.  An analysis of core deformations in protein superfamilies. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[38]  Patrice Koehl,et al.  NOMAD-Ref: visualization, deformation and refinement of macromolecular structures based on all-atom normal mode analysis , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[39]  H. Gohlke,et al.  Large‐scale comparison of protein essential dynamics from molecular dynamics simulations and coarse‐grained normal mode analyses , 2010, Proteins.

[40]  D. Zerbino,et al.  Core deformations in protein families: a physical perspective. , 2005, Biophysical chemistry.

[41]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[42]  Nathalie Reuter,et al.  Measuring and comparing structural fluctuation patterns in large protein datasets , 2012, Bioinform..

[43]  Gennady Verkhivker,et al.  Experimentally Guided Structural Modeling and Dynamics Analysis of Hsp90-p53 Interactions: Allosteric Regulation of the Hsp90 Chaperone by a Client Protein , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[44]  Michael D. Daily,et al.  Many local motions cooperate to produce the adenylate kinase conformational transition. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.

[45]  Mohammad R. K. Mofrad,et al.  Localized Lipid Packing of Transmembrane Domains Impedes Integrin Clustering , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[46]  Francesca Fanelli,et al.  Deciphering the deformation modes associated with function retention and specialization in members of the Ras superfamily. , 2010, Structure.

[47]  Modesto Orozco,et al.  Comparison of molecular dynamics and superfamily spaces of protein domain deformation , 2009, BMC Structural Biology.

[48]  Osamu Miyashita,et al.  Conformational transitions of adenylate kinase: switching by cracking. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[49]  I. Bahar,et al.  Normal mode analysis of biomolecular structures: functional mechanisms of membrane proteins. , 2010, Chemical reviews.

[50]  Jianpeng Ma,et al.  Usefulness and limitations of normal mode analysis in modeling dynamics of biomolecular complexes. , 2005, Structure.

[51]  Cristian Micheletti,et al.  Small- and large-scale conformational changes of adenylate kinase: a molecular dynamics study of the subdomain motion and mechanics. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[52]  P. Chacón,et al.  Thorough validation of protein normal mode analysis: a comparative study with essential dynamics. , 2007, Structure.

[53]  A. Konagurthu,et al.  MUSTANG: A multiple structural alignment algorithm , 2006, Proteins.

[54]  J. Echave,et al.  A perturbative view of protein structural variation , 2010, Proteins.

[55]  W. Taylor,et al.  Exploring the factors determining the dynamics of different protein folds , 2011, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[56]  F. Tama.  Normal mode analysis with simplified models to investigate the global dynamics of biological systems. , 2003, Protein and peptide letters.

[57]  Steven Hayward,et al.  Essential dynamics sampling study of adenylate kinase: Comparison to citrate synthase and implication for the hinge and shear mechanisms of domain motions , 2007, Proteins.

[58]  A. Terzic,et al.  Adenylate Kinase Isoform Network: A Major Hub in Cell Energetics and Metabolic Signaling , 2014 .

[59]  K. Hinsen,et al.  Evaluation of Protein Elastic Network Models Based on an Analysis of Collective Motions. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[60]  B. Brenner,et al.  Targeted optimization of a protein nanomachine for operation in biohybrid devices. , 2010, Angewandte Chemie.

[61]  Ivet Bahar,et al.  Changes in Dynamics upon Oligomerization Regulate Substrate Binding and Allostery in Amino Acid Kinase Family Members , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[62]  Konrad Hinsen,et al.  Structural flexibility in proteins: impact of the crystal environment , 2008, Bioinform..

[63]  S. Bhattacharyya,et al.  Comparison of the Intrinsic Dynamics of Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases , 2014, The Protein Journal.

[64]  M Gerstein,et al.  Domain closure in adenylate kinase. Joints on either side of two helices close like neighboring fingers. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[65]  Mark A. Wilson,et al.  Intrinsic motions along an enzymatic reaction trajectory , 2007, Nature.

[66]  Konrad Hinsen,et al.  The molecular modeling toolkit: A new approach to molecular simulations , 2000, J. Comput. Chem..

[67]  W. Delano.  The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System (2002) , 2002 .

[68]  Javad Golji,et al.  Molecular Mechanics of the α-Actinin Rod Domain: Bending, Torsional, and Extensional Behavior , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[69]  Karsten Suhre,et al.  ElNémo: a normal mode web server for protein movement analysis and the generation of templates for molecular replacement , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[70]  A. Lesk,et al.  Correspondences between low‐energy modes in enzymes: Dynamics‐based alignment of enzymatic functional families , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[71]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Essential dynamics of proteins , 1993, Proteins.

[72]  Nathalie Reuter,et al.  WEBnm@: a web application for normal mode analyses of proteins , 2005, BMC Bioinformatics.

[73]  Holger Gohlke,et al.  NMSim Web Server: integrated approach for normal mode-based geometric simulations of biologically relevant conformational transitions in proteins , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[74]  Javad Golji,et al.  A molecular dynamics investigation of vinculin activation. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[75]  D. Rodionov,et al.  Crystal structures of the first condensation domain of CDA synthetase suggest conformational changes during the synthetic cycle of nonribosomal peptide synthetases. , 2013, Journal of molecular biology.

[76]  Tod D Romo,et al.  Validating and improving elastic network models with molecular dynamics simulations , 2011, Proteins.

[77]  Suryani Lukman,et al.  A network of dynamically conserved residues deciphers the motions of maltose transporter , 2009, Proteins.

[78]  Dmitrii E Makarov,et al.  Critical evaluation of simple network models of protein dynamics and their comparison with crystallographic B-factors , 2008, Physical biology.

[79]  A G Murzin,et al.  SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[80]  Andrea Zen,et al.  Using dynamics-based comparisons to predict nucleic acid binding sites in proteins: an application to OB-fold domains , 2009, Bioinform..

[81]  K. Hinsen,et al.  Harmonicity in slow protein dynamics , 2000 .

[82]  Sebastian Doniach,et al.  A comparative study of motor-protein motions by using a simple elastic-network model , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.