Attitudes about the computer-based test of English as a Foreign Language

Abstract The principal aim of this study was to assess test takers’ acceptance of the computer-based version of the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL), and the links between this acceptance, general attitudes about admissions tests, other possible determinants, and test performance. A secondary goal was to evaluate differences in the pattern of results for test takers from different countries. A questionnaire concerning attitudes about the test, familiarity with computers, and other relevant variables was administered to TOEFL test takers at large testing centers in Buenos Aires, Cairo, and Frankfurt. Attitudes about the TOEFL were moderately positive and had similar patterns of relationships in the three countries: slight or moderate with test performance, moderate with general attitudes about admissions tests, slight with computer anxiety and test anxiety, and minimal with other variables.

[1]  Donald E. Powers,et al.  PREPARING FOR THE GRADUATE MANAGEMENT ADMISSION TEST: A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY OF CANDIDATES' USE OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF TEST PREPARATION , 1982 .

[2]  Jeri Benson,et al.  Testing the Factor Structure Invariance of a Computer Attitude Scale Over Two Grouping Conditions , 1990 .

[3]  Joan Jamieson,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A SCALE FOR ASSESSING THE LEVEL OF COMPUTER FAMILIARITY OF TOEFL EXAMINEES , 1998 .

[4]  Jeri Benson,et al.  Further refinement and validation of the revised test anxiety scale , 1994 .

[5]  Geoffry S. Howard,et al.  Computer Anxiety and Computer Attitudes: An Investigation of Construct and Predictive Validity Issues , 1990 .

[6]  Richard D. Arvey,et al.  MOTIVATIONAL COMPONENTS OF TEST TAKING , 1990 .

[7]  M. Burke,et al.  Examinee attitudes toward computer-administered ability testing , 1987 .

[8]  L. Shepard,et al.  Methods for Identifying Biased Test Items , 1994 .

[9]  D W Fiske,et al.  The subject reacts to tests. , 1967, The American psychologist.

[10]  John Mazzeo Comparability of Computer and Paper-and-Pencil Scores for Two CLEP General Examinations. College Board Report No. 91-5. , 1991 .

[11]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  Applicants’ Perceptions of Selection Procedures and Decisions: A Critical Review and Agenda for the Future , 2000 .

[12]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[13]  Donald E. Powers,et al.  Inexperienced and Anxious Computer Users: Coping With a Computer-Administered Test of Academic Skills , 1993 .

[14]  J. Cooper Gender and computers , 2003 .

[15]  James W. Smither,et al.  APPLICANT REACTIONS TO SELECTION PROCEDURES , 2006 .

[16]  Frank L. Schmidt,et al.  Computer Assisted Tailored Testing: Examinee Reactions and Evaluations , 1978 .

[17]  Lawrence J. Stricker,et al.  Identifying Test Items That Perform Differentially in Population Subgroups: A Partial Correlation Index , 1982 .

[18]  Ronald S. Landis,et al.  COMPUTER‐BASED TESTING APPLIED TO SELECTION OF SECRETARIAL APPLICANTS , 2006 .

[19]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Measures Of Personality And Social Psychological Attitudes , 1991 .

[20]  Irwin S. Kirsch,et al.  Examining the Relationship Between Computer Familiarity and Performance on Computer‐Based Language Tasks , 1999 .

[21]  Gita Z. Wilder,et al.  Gender and computers: Two surveys of computer-related attitudes , 1985 .

[22]  Jo Ann Lee The Effects of Past Computer Experience on Computerized Aptitude Test Performance , 1986 .

[23]  Clarice P. Gressard,et al.  Reliability and Factorial Validity of Computer Attitude Scales , 1984 .

[24]  S. Wise,et al.  Effects of Computer Anxiety and Computer Experience on the Computer-Based Achievement Test Performance of College Students , 1989 .

[25]  S. Gilliland,et al.  Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to a selection system. , 1994 .

[26]  H. Wainer,et al.  Differential Item Functioning. , 1994 .

[27]  Gita Z. Wilder,et al.  EXAMINEES' ATTITUDES ABOUT THE TOEFL-CBT, POSSIBLE DETERMINANTS, AND RELATIONSHIPS WITH TEST PERFORMANCE , 2001 .