Will technology advances alleviate climate change? Dual effects of technology change on aggregate carbon dioxide emissions

Abstract The relationship between technology change and carbon dioxide emissions is complex. Existing research has emphasized technology progress in reducing carbon emission intensity but has ignored the impact of technology progress on economic growth, which leads to changes in carbon dioxide emissions. We argue that technology has relatively independent economic and environmental attributes. To provide evidence for this, we developed a method to distinguish the scale effect of technology change and its influence on economic scale from the intensity effect of technology change and its influence on carbon emission intensity. We applied this method to study the impact of technology change on carbon dioxide emissions in 95 countries between 1996 and 2007. We found that technology change indeed reduced aggregate carbon dioxide emissions, but the scale and intensity effects of technology change separately expressed positive and negative values. As a consequence, previous studies that only consider the intensity effect overestimate the impact of technology change on carbon dioxide emissions. Our findings yield important considerations for carbon dioxide emissions control in policy making.

[1]  P. Romer Endogenous Technological Change , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[2]  E. Voet,et al.  How to deal with the rebound effect? A policy-oriented approach , 2016 .

[3]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Productivity and Undesirable Outputs: A Directional Distance Function Approach , 1995 .

[4]  Jari Kaivo-oja,et al.  ASEAN tigers and sustainability of energy use--decomposition analysis of energy and CO2 efficiency dynamics , 2002 .

[5]  R. Färe,et al.  Accounting for Air Pollution Emissions in Measures of State Manufacturing Productivity Growth , 2001 .

[6]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  Decomposition of useful work intensity: The EU (European Union)-15 countries from 1960 to 2009 , 2014 .

[7]  A. Sagar,et al.  Making sense of policy for climate technology development and transfer , 2015 .

[8]  Xian Zhang,et al.  A large national survey of public perceptions of CCS technology in China , 2015 .

[9]  Elhanan Helpman,et al.  Trade, Knowledge Spillovers, and Growth , 1990 .

[10]  E. Wang R&D efficiency and economic performance: A cross-country analysis using the stochastic frontier approach , 2007 .

[11]  Masahiro Nishio,et al.  Role of innovative technologies under the global zero emissions scenarios , 2016 .

[12]  G. Bush Economic Report of the President , 2001 .

[13]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 1997, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  D. Ockwell,et al.  Collaborative research and development (R&D) for climate technology transfer and uptake in developing countries: towards a needs driven approach , 2015, Climatic Change.

[15]  G. Leduc,et al.  Bottom-up estimation of industrial and public R&D investment by technology in support of policy-making: the case of selected low-carbon energy technologies , 2012 .

[16]  B. W. Ang,et al.  A survey of index decomposition analysis in energy and environmental studies , 2000 .

[17]  Yongchen Song,et al.  Decomposition of energy-related CO2 emission over 1991-2006 in China , 2009 .

[18]  S. Grosskopf,et al.  PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH IN APEC COUNTRIES , 1996 .

[19]  Elizabeth L. Malone,et al.  Global Energy Technology Strategy: Addressing Climate Change Phase 2 Findings from an international Public-Private Sponsored Research Program , 2007 .

[20]  Truong P. Truong,et al.  Impact assessment of emissions stabilization scenarios with and without induced technological change , 2007 .

[21]  Shinji Kaneko,et al.  Driving forces behind the stagnancy of China's energy-related CO2 emissions from 1996 to 1999: The relative importance of structural change, intensity change and scale change , 2005 .

[22]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  G. Jefferson,et al.  R&D and Technology Transfer: Firm-Level Evidence from Chinese Industry , 2003, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[24]  Man Li,et al.  Decomposing the change of CO2 emissions in China: A distance function approach , 2010 .

[25]  Jenny Arnell,et al.  Potential impact on air pollution from ambitious national CO2 emission abatement strategies in the Nordic countries – environmental links between the UNFCCC and the UNECE – CLRTAP , 2013 .

[26]  Vivian Scott,et al.  What can we expect from Europe's carbon capture and storage demonstrations? , 2013 .

[27]  D. Stern Explaining changes in global sulfur emissions: an econometric decomposition approach , 2002 .

[28]  S. Sorrell The rebound effect: an assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency , 2007 .

[29]  Robert G. Chambers,et al.  A New Look at Exact Input, Output, Productivity, and Technical Change Measurement , 1996 .

[30]  H. Herring,et al.  Technological innovation, energy efficient design and the rebound effect , 2007 .

[31]  John P. Weyant,et al.  On the sources of technological change: What do the models assume , 2008 .

[32]  S. Rubio Sharing R&D Investments in Breakthrough Technologies to Control Climate Change , 2016 .

[33]  Elmar Kriegler,et al.  Role of technologies in energy-related CO2 mitigation in China within a climate-protection world: A scenarios analysis using REMIND , 2014 .

[34]  Chun-Chu Liu,et al.  An extended method for key factors in reducing CO2 emissions , 2007, Appl. Math. Comput..

[35]  Lukas Kranzl,et al.  Assessing the economic efficiency of bioenergy technologies in climate mitigation and fossil fuel replacement in Austria using a techno-economic approach , 2011 .

[36]  T. Panayotou Economic Growth and the Environment , 2000 .

[37]  Björn Nykvist,et al.  Ten times more difficult: Quantifying the carbon capture and storage challenge , 2013 .

[38]  M. Grubb Technology Innovation and Climate Change Policy: an overview of issues and options , 2004 .

[39]  Carl A. Pasurka,et al.  Decomposing electric power plant emissions within a joint production framework , 2006 .

[40]  Tiffany Hui-Kuang Yu,et al.  Heterogeneous effect of high-tech industrial R&D spending on economic growth , 2013 .

[41]  Jan Christoph Steckel,et al.  From carbonization to decarbonization?—Past trends and future scenarios for China's CO2 emissions , 2011 .

[42]  Igor Kuzle,et al.  Low carbon technologies as providers of operational flexibility in future power systems , 2016, Applied Energy.

[43]  M. Tavoni,et al.  The Role of R&D and Technology Diffusion in Climate Change Mitigation: New Perspectives Using the Witch Model , 2009 .

[44]  S. Rubio,et al.  Sharing R&D Investments in Cleaner Technologies to Mitigate Climate Change , 2014 .

[45]  S. Sorrell,et al.  Empirical estimates of the direct rebound effect: A review , 2009 .

[46]  Richard G. Newell,et al.  Environmental and Technology Policies for Climate Mitigation , 2008 .

[47]  Scott Barrett,et al.  Climate Treaties and "Breakthrough" Technologies , 2006 .

[48]  G. Grossman,et al.  Economic Growth and the Environment , 1994 .

[49]  Jinyue Yan,et al.  CDM’s influence on technology transfers: A study of the implemented clean development mechanism projects in China , 2015 .

[50]  Wesley Longhofer,et al.  How organizational and global factors condition the effects of energy efficiency on CO2 emission rebounds among the world's power plants , 2016 .

[51]  Madhumita Bhattacharya,et al.  The role of technology on the dynamics of coal consumption–economic growth: New evidence from China , 2015 .

[52]  Yung-Hsiang Lu,et al.  R&D, productivity, and market value: An empirical study from high-technology firms , 2013 .

[53]  Boqiang Lin,et al.  Technological progress and energy rebound effect in China׳s textile industry: Evidence and policy implications , 2016 .

[54]  S. Sorrell,et al.  The rebound effect: Microeconomic definitions, limitations and extensions , 2008 .

[55]  A. Petruzzelli,et al.  Understanding the development trends of low-carbon energy technologies: A patent analysis , 2014 .

[56]  Mingquan Li,et al.  International environmental efficiency differences and their determinants , 2014 .

[57]  Paul A. Webley,et al.  Adsorption technology for CO2 separation and capture: a perspective , 2014, Adsorption.

[58]  R. Allen Technology and the great divergence: Global economic development since 1820 , 2012 .

[59]  Yang Liu,et al.  Estimation of global rebound effect caused by energy efficiency improvement , 2017 .

[60]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Effects on relative efficiency in electric power generation due to environmental controls , 1986 .

[61]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Decomposition of aggregate CO2 emissions: A production-theoretical approach , 2008 .

[62]  C. Lovell,et al.  The Decomposition of Malmquist Productivity Indexes , 2003 .

[63]  E. Hertwich Consumption and the Rebound Effect: An Industrial Ecology Perspective , 2005 .

[64]  Jining Chen,et al.  Decomposition of energy-related CO2 emission in China: 1957–2000 , 2005 .

[65]  David R. Luebke,et al.  Advances in CO2 capture technology: A patent review , 2013 .