Technological innovation capability creation potential of open innovation: a cross-level analysis in the biotechnology industry

The primary objective of this study is to investigate the ability of open innovation and intra-organisational learning mechanisms to spur technological innovation capability. Accordingly, this study devises a multi-level model for examining the links between contextual variables and collects data via a multi-informant questionnaire. This study applies hierarchical linear modelling (HLM) to examine three hypotheses. Using a matched dyadic data set from a study of 328 R&D employees and 33 supervisors sampled from 33 biotechnology firms, the HLM results clearly demonstrate how open innovation moderates the relationship between internal learning and technological innovation capability. These results suggest that internal learning strengthens the technological innovation capabilities of an R&D team. Specifically, the relationship between internal learning and technological innovation capability is stronger when R&D teams adopt open innovation. Moreover, this paper offers a contribution to understanding the cross-level and external–internal aspects of open innovation by adding multi-level analysis of biotechnology firms.

[1]  D. Dillman Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method , 1979 .

[2]  J. Gill Hierarchical Linear Models , 2005 .

[3]  Patricia Ordóñez de Pablos,et al.  Knowledge management and organizational learning: typologies of knowledge strategies in the Spanish manufacturing industry from 1995 to 1999 , 2002, J. Knowl. Manag..

[4]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[5]  B. Clarysse,et al.  Building absorptive capacity to organise inbound open innovation in traditional industries , 2010 .

[6]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[7]  Lars Bo Jeppesen,et al.  Consumers as Co-developers: Learning and Innovation Outside the Firm , 2003, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[8]  Francisco Javier Lloréns Montes,et al.  Effects of Technology Absorptive Capacity and Technology Proactivity on Organizational Learning, Innovation and Performance: An Empirical Examination , 2007, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[9]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[10]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[11]  Fariborz Damanpour,et al.  The Application of External Knowledge: Organizational Conditions for Exploration and Exploitation , 2009 .

[12]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[13]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes , 2003 .

[14]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[15]  Wenpin Tsai Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance , 2001 .

[16]  Bou-Wen Lin,et al.  Technology transfer as technological learning: a source of competitive advantage for firms with limited R&D resources , 2003 .

[17]  Joshua Lajčiak,et al.  Managing Open Innovation , 2012 .

[18]  U. Lichtenthaler,et al.  A Capability-Based Framework for Open Innovation: Complementing Absorptive Capacity , 2009 .

[19]  Javier González-Benito,et al.  The intervening effect of business innovation capability on the relationship between Total Quality Management and technological innovation , 2009 .

[20]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[21]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  Outbound Open Innovation and its Effect on Firm Performance: Examining Environmental Influences , 2009 .

[22]  Paulo N. Figueiredo,et al.  Learning, capability accumulation and firms differences: evidence from latecomer steel , 2003 .

[23]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[24]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Multilevel Analysis , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[25]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[26]  O. Gassmann,et al.  Open R&D and Open Innovation: Exploring the Phenomenon , 2009 .

[27]  Jing Zhou,et al.  A CROSS-LEVEL PERSPECTIVE ON EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY: GOAL ORIENTATION, TEAM LEARNING BEHAVIOR, AND INDIVIDUAL CREATIVITY , 2009 .

[28]  Marcus M. Keupp,et al.  Determinants and Archetype Users of Open Innovation , 2009 .

[29]  Henrik Bresman,et al.  External Learning Activities and Team Performance: A Multimethod Field Study , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[30]  Jiann-Chyuan Wang,et al.  External technology sourcing and innovation performance in LMT sectors: An analysis based on the Taiwanese Technological Innovation Survey , 2009 .

[31]  Cora J. M. Maas,et al.  Robustness issues in multilevel regression analysis , 2004 .

[32]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[33]  K. Sutcliffe,et al.  Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[34]  Mikko A. Junttila,et al.  A resource-based view of manufacturing strategy and the relationship to manufacturing performance , 2002 .

[35]  C. E. Hull,et al.  Learning Capability, Technological Parity, and Innovation Mode Use , 2010 .

[36]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[37]  Anna Nosella,et al.  Characteristics of the Italian biotechnology industry and new business models: the initial results of an empirical study , 2005 .

[38]  Pervaiz K. Ahmed,et al.  Knowledge management orientation: construct development and empirical validation , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[39]  P. Berthon,et al.  Market Orientation, Generative Learning, Innovation Strategy and Business Performance Inter-Relationships in Bioscience Firms , 2008 .

[40]  W. Vanhaverbeke,et al.  Choosing Governance Modes for External Technology Sourcing , 2006 .

[41]  Joseph Z. Shyu,et al.  Policy tools on the formation of new biotechnology firms in Taiwan , 2005 .

[42]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[43]  D. Hofmann An Overview of the Logic and Rationale of Hierarchical Linear Models , 1997 .

[44]  J. Barney Types of Competition and the Theory of Strategy: Toward an Integrative Framework , 1986 .

[45]  William Q. Judge,et al.  The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, by Edith T. Penrose. Oxford: Blackwell, 1959 (Book Review) , 2008 .

[46]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[47]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Beyond High Tech: Early Adopters of Open Innovation in Other Industries , 2006 .

[48]  Chie-Bein Chen,et al.  Evaluating firm technological innovation capability under uncertainty , 2008 .

[49]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks : Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance , 2007 .

[50]  H. Chesbrough The Era of Open Innovation , 2003 .

[51]  Sabina Nielsen,et al.  Learning and Innovation in International Strategic Alliances: An Empirical Test of the Role of Trust and Tacitness , 2009 .