Central representation of dynamics when manipulating handheld objects.

To explore the neural mechanisms related to representation of the manipulation dynamics of objects, we performed whole-brain fMRI while subjects balanced an object in stable and highly unstable states and while they balanced a rigid object and a flexible object in the same unstable state, in all cases without vision. In this way, we varied the extent to which an internal model of the manipulation dynamics was required in the moment-to-moment control of the object's orientation. We hypothesized that activity in primary motor cortex would reflect the amount of muscle activation under each condition. In contrast, we hypothesized that cerebellar activity would be more strongly related to the stability and complexity of the manipulation dynamics because the cerebellum has been implicated in internal model-based control. As hypothesized, the dynamics-related activation of the cerebellum was quite different from that of the primary motor cortex. Changes in cerebellar activity were much greater than would have been predicted from differences in muscle activation when the stability and complexity of the manipulation dynamics were contrasted. On the other hand, the activity of the primary motor cortex more closely resembled the mean motor output necessary to execute the task. We also discovered a small region near the anterior edge of the ipsilateral (right) inferior parietal lobule where activity was modulated with the complexity of the manipulation dynamics. We suggest that this is related to imagining the location and motion of an object with complex manipulation dynamics.

[1]  R Kawashima,et al.  Activity in the human primary motor cortex related to arm and finger movements. , 1995, Neuroreport.

[2]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[3]  M. Kawato,et al.  Internal forward models in the cerebellum: fMRI study on grip force and load force coupling. , 2003, Progress in brain research.

[4]  J. Murphy,et al.  Cerebellar modulation of reflex gain , 1979, Progress in Neurobiology.

[5]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Quantitative Comparison of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Positron Emission Tomography Using a Force-Related Paradigm , 1996, NeuroImage.

[6]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[7]  H. Forssberg,et al.  Differential fronto-parietal activation depending on force used in a precision grip task: an fMRI study. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[9]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Feedback-Error-Learning Neural Network for Supervised Motor Learning , 1990 .

[10]  James V. Stone,et al.  Recurrent cerebellar architecture solves the motor-error problem , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  Joseph A Maldjian,et al.  Precentral gyrus discrepancy in electronic versions of the Talairach atlas , 2004, NeuroImage.

[12]  P. Strick,et al.  Basal ganglia and cerebellar loops: motor and cognitive circuits , 2000, Brain Research Reviews.

[13]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Neuronal Correlates of Motor Performance and Motor Learning in the Primary Motor Cortex of Monkeys Adapting to an External Force Field , 2001, Neuron.

[14]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Intact ability to learn internal models of arm dynamics in Huntington's disease but not cerebellar degeneration. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Neuronal activity in the supplementary motor area of monkeys adapting to a new dynamic environment. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Jing Z. Liu,et al.  Relationship between muscle output and functional MRI-measured brain activation , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  Paul J. Laurienti,et al.  An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets , 2003, NeuroImage.

[18]  H. Freund,et al.  The role of the inferior parietal cortex in linking the tactile perception and manual construction of object shapes. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  M. Kawato,et al.  Modular organization of internal models of tools in the human cerebellum , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Hiroshi Imamizu,et al.  Human cerebellar activity reflecting an acquired internal model of a new tool , 2000, Nature.

[21]  T. Ebner,et al.  Hereditary cerebellar ataxia progressively impairs force adaptation during goal-directed arm movements. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  R. J. Seitz,et al.  A fronto‐parietal circuit for object manipulation in man: evidence from an fMRI‐study , 1999, The European journal of neuroscience.

[23]  R. Johansson,et al.  Evidence for the involvement of the posterior parietal cortex in coordination of fingertip forces for grasp stability in manipulation. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  Hans Forssberg,et al.  Human brain activity in the control of fine static precision grip forces: an fMRI study , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[25]  J. Houk,et al.  Functional connectivity between cerebellum and primary motor cortex in the awake monkey. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  W. Penny,et al.  Random-Effects Analysis , 2002 .

[27]  M. Erb,et al.  Sensorimotor mapping of the human cerebellum: fMRI evidence of somatotopic organization , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[28]  G. Thickbroom,et al.  Isometric force-related activity in sensorimotor cortex measured with functional MRI , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Long-term adaptation to dynamics of reaching movements: a PET study , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  Hans Forssberg,et al.  Brain activity during predictable and unpredictable weight changes when lifting objects. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  Jun Tanji,et al.  The relationship between MI and SMA afferents and cerebellar and pallidal efferents in the macaque monkey , 2002, Somatosensory & motor research.