Flexibility performance: Taguchi's method study of physical system and operating control parameters of FMS

In present manufacturing environment, the manufacturing flexibility has become one of the strategic competitive tools. Flexibility refers to the availability of alternative resources. These resources may have varied parameters, particularly related to physical and operating system. These physical and operating parameters of alternative resources may influence the system's performance with the changing levels of flexibility and operational control parameters such as scheduling rules. Is increase in a flexibility level provides desired improved performance output? If yes, than under what conditions of physical and operating parameters and under which control strategy (CS)? Is improved performance is present at all increasing levels of flexibility? Flexible manufacturing system (FMS) being consist of numerous physical and operating parameters and complex in nature, the solution to these questions can provide an understanding of the productive levels of flexibility for a given physical and operating parameters of an FMS. This paper establishes the need of modelling of the physical and operating parameters of flexible manufacturing system along with flexibility and presents a simulation study under Taguchi's method analysis of these parameters. The paper contributes an approach to study the impact of variations in physical and operating parameters of an FMS and to identify the level of these variations that do not restrict the advantages of flexibility. The results show that the expected benefits from increasing the levels of flexibility and a superior CS may not be achieved if the physical and operating parameters of alternative machines have variations. Taguchi's method analysis indicates that relative percentage contribution of variations in physical and operating parameters of alternative resources should be negligible or minimum in the performance of FMS. Their increasing relative contribution may restrict the advantages of flexibility. If these variations are higher than increase in flexibility level may be counter productive.

[1]  Vidyaranya B. Gargeya,et al.  Scheduling in the dynamic job shop under auxiliary resource constraints: A simulation study , 1999 .

[2]  Bhaba R. Sarker,et al.  A survey and critical review of flexibility measures in manufacturing systems , 1994 .

[3]  H.J.J. Kals,et al.  THE INTEGRATION OF PROCESS PLANNING AND MACHINE LOADING IN SMALL BATCH PART MANUFACTURING , 1993 .

[4]  Manfredi Bruccoleri,et al.  An Object-Oriented Approach for Flexible Manufacturing Control Systems Analysis and Design Using the Unified Modeling Language , 2003 .

[5]  Miryam Barad,et al.  Flexibility in manufacturing systems: definitions and Petri net modelling , 1988 .

[6]  Diwakar Gupta,et al.  A framework for understanding flexibility of manufacturing systems , 1989 .

[7]  Felix T. S. Chan,et al.  The effects of routing flexibility on a flexible manufacturing system , 2001, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[8]  Masayuki Matsui,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Flexible Manufacturing Systems with Finite Local Buffers: Fixed and Dynamic Routings , 2001 .

[9]  Jaejin Jang,et al.  Vehicle Travel Time Models for AGV Systems under Various Dispatching Rules , 2002 .

[10]  B. Shnits,et al.  Multicriteria dynamic scheduling methodology for controlling a flexible manufacturing system , 2004 .

[11]  Henrique Luiz Corrêa,et al.  Framework to analyse flexibility and unplanned change in manufacturing systems , 1996 .

[12]  Jimmie Browne,et al.  Production management systems - a CIM perspective , 1988 .

[13]  Ihsan Sabuncuoglu,et al.  Routing-based reactive scheduling policies for machine failures in dynamic job shops , 2001 .

[14]  R. C. Leachman,et al.  Reduced simulation models of wafer fabrication facilities , 1999 .

[15]  Tapan P. Bagchi,et al.  Taguchi methods explained : practical steps to robust design , 1993 .

[16]  Sanchoy K. Das,et al.  The measurement of flexibility in manufacturing systems , 1996 .

[17]  Bruno Baynat,et al.  Production Capacity of Flexible Manufacturing Systems with Fixed Production Ratios , 2002 .

[18]  Jong Gye Shin,et al.  Evolutionary Simulation-Based-Design (ESBD) methodology for large computer integrated manufacturing systems , 2001, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[19]  Byoung Kyu Choi,et al.  QUANTIFYING THE FLEXIBILITY VALUE IN AUTOMATED MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS , 1994 .

[20]  Madhan Shridhar Phadke,et al.  Quality Engineering Using Robust Design , 1989 .

[21]  Fu-Kwun Wang,et al.  Simulation analysis of dispatching rules for an automated interbay material handling system in wafer fab , 2001 .

[22]  J. N. D. Gupta.  Part dispatching and machine loading in flexible manufacturing systems using central queues , 1999 .

[23]  Ram Rachamadugu,et al.  Classification and review of FMS scheduling procedures , 1994 .

[24]  David Bennett,et al.  Modular system design and control for flexible assembly , 1989 .

[25]  Marilyn Hwan,et al.  Quality through design , 1989 .

[26]  Subhash Wadhwa,et al.  Flexibility: an emerging meta-competence for managing high technology , 2000, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[27]  Manoj Kumar Tiwari,et al.  Solving the machine-loading problem in a flexible manufacturing system using a combinatorial auction-based approach , 2004 .

[28]  Manoj Kumar Tiwari,et al.  Scheduling of flexible manufacturing systems: An ant colony optimization approach , 2003 .

[29]  Paul Forrester,et al.  Market‐driven Strategies and the Design of Flexible Production Systems: Evidence from the Electronics Industry , 1992 .

[30]  Jalal Ashayeri,et al.  Manufacturing cell performance improvement: a simulation study , 2001 .

[31]  Felix T.S. Chan,et al.  Evaluations of operational control rules in scheduling a flexible manufacturing system , 1999 .