Implementation of smart pump technology in a paediatric intensive care unit

Patient safety is a matter of major concern that involves every health professional. Nowadays, emerging technologies such as smart pumps can diminish medication errors as well as standardise and improve clinical practice with the subsequent benefits for patients. The aim of this paper was to describe the smart pump implementation process in a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and to present the most relevant infusion-related programming errors that were prevented. This was a comparative study between CareFusion Alaris Guardrails® and Hospira MedNet® systems, as well as a prospective and intervention study with analytical components carried out in the PICU of Gregorio Marañón General and Teaching Hospital. All intravenous infusions programmed with a pump in the eleven beds of the unit were analyzed. A drug library was developed and subsequently loaded into CareFusion and Hospira pumps that were used during a three month period each. The most suitable system for implementation was selected according to their differences in features and users’ acceptance. Data stored in the pumps were analyzed to assess user compliance with the technology, health care setting and type of errors intercepted. The implementation process was carried out with CareFusion systems. Compliance with the technology was 92% and user acceptance was high. Vacation substitution and drug administration periods were significantly associated with a greater number of infusion-related programming errors. High risk drugs were involved in 48% of intercepted errors. Based on these results we can conclude that implementation of smart pumps proved effective in intercepting infusion-related programming errors from reaching patients. User awareness of the importance of programming infusions with the drug library is the key to succeed in the implementation process.

[1]  J. Sullivan,et al.  Medication errors in pediatrics—the octopus evading defeat , 2004, Journal of surgical oncology.

[2]  C. Fernández-Llamazares,et al.  Development of a Compatibility Chart for Intravenous Y-Site Drug Administration in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit , 2012, Journal of infusion nursing : the official publication of the Infusion Nurses Society.

[3]  Lor Siv-Lee,et al.  Implementation of Wireless “Intelligent” Pump IV Infusion Technology in a Not-for-Profit Academic Hospital Setting , 2007 .

[4]  Lawrence A. Trissel,et al.  Handbook on Injectable Drugs , 1983 .

[5]  Ronald D Snodgrass Smart pump technology. , 2005, Biomedical instrumentation & technology.

[6]  María Sanjurjo-Sáez,et al.  Smart pump alerts: All that glitters is not gold , 2012, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[7]  María Sanjurjo-Sáez,et al.  Developing a drug library for smart pumps in a pediatric intensive care unit , 2012, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[8]  Elisabeth Burdick,et al.  A controlled trial of smart infusion pumps to improve medication safety in critically ill patients1 , 2007, Critical care medicine.

[9]  Burnis D Breland,et al.  Continuous quality improvement using intelligent infusion pump data analysis. , 2010, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[10]  Disciplinary Committee,et al.  Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain , 2002 .

[11]  Pascale Carayon,et al.  Nurses' acceptance of Smart IV pump technology , 2010, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[12]  [Smart infusion pumps: lights and shadows of an emerging technology]. , 2011, Medicina clinica.

[13]  Torsten Hoppe-Tichy,et al.  Prevention of intravenous drug incompatibilities in an intensive care unit. , 2008, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[14]  G. Pepper,et al.  Errors in drug administration by nurses. , 1995, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[15]  Impact of smart infusion technology on administration of anticoagulants (unfractionated Heparin, Argatroban, Lepirudin, and Bivalirudin). , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.

[16]  Susan Thurman,et al.  An Intravenous Medication Safety System: Preventing High-Risk Medication Errors at the Point of Care , 2004, The Journal of nursing administration.

[17]  L C Hadaway Managing i.v. therapy: "high-alert" drugs keep nurse managers ever watchful. , 2000, Nursing management.

[18]  D. Rooney,et al.  Insights from the sharp end of intravenous medication errors: implications for infusion pump technology , 2005, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[19]  Jan Mainz,et al.  Errors in the medication process: frequency, type, and potential clinical consequences. , 2005, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[20]  David W. Bates,et al.  Intelligent Intravenous Infusion Pumps to Improve Medication Administration Safety , 2003, AMIA.

[21]  A. I. Miasso,et al.  Medication preparation and administration: analysis of inquiries and information by the nursing team. , 2007, Revista latino-americana de enfermagem.

[22]  P. Ball Intravenous in‐line filters: filtering the evidence , 2003, Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care.

[23]  Silvia Manrique-Rodríguez,et al.  Bombas de infusión inteligentes: luces y sombras de una tecnología en desarrollo , 2011 .

[24]  J. Cafazzo,et al.  The impact of traditional and smart pump infusion technology on nurse medication administration performance in a simulated inpatient unit , 2010, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[25]  Rollin J. Fairbanks,et al.  Programmable Infusion Pumps in ICUs: An Analysis of Corresponding Adverse Drug Events , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.