Multidimensional scaling of painful and innocuous electrocutaneous stimuli: Reliability and individual differences

Multidimensional scaling was used to explore whether a single intensity dimension underlies the perception of both nonpainful and painful electrical stimuli, or whether separate dimensions are required. For the scaling (INDSCAL) procedure, 41 healthy volunteers judged the similarity between all pairs of 16 intensities, which ranged from imperceptible levels to pain tolerance. For the property mapping (PREFMAP) analysis, they rated each intensity on each of 16 property scales. INDSCAL revealed four dimensions that showed high levels of both test-retest and splithalf reliability. The first dimension scaled stimuli from the lowest intensity to the pais threshold. This dimension was related to property scales of sensation, affect, and arousal, butnot pain, suggesting a sensory magnitude dimension. The second dimension ordered the stimuli from mildly to severely painful and was related to the painful property scale, suggesting a pain intensity dimension. Third and fourth dimensions, which refined the scaling of nonpainful stimuli, were also found. Variability in the subjects’ use of the painful and nonpainful dimensions was related to their choice of stimulus descriptors. Like clinical pain, laboratory pain requires multidimensional assessment

[1]  S. Schiffman.  Introduction to Multidimensional Scaling , 1981 .

[2]  A. Higashiyama,et al.  Magnitude estimates for electrical pulses: Evidence for two neural mechanisms , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  J. Carroll,et al.  The dimensions of pain: a multidimensional scaling comparison of cancer patients and healthy volunteers , 1989, Pain.

[4]  The structure of pain descriptors , 1981, PAIN.

[5]  Multidimensional scaling of pain experiences , 1984 .

[6]  B. Tursky.  Presidential address, 1973. Physical, physiological, and psychological factors that affect pain reaction to electric shock. , 1974, Psychophysiology.

[7]  B. Tursky,et al.  The pain perception profile: A psychophysical approach to the assessment of pain report , 1982 .

[8]  B. Rosner,et al.  Electrical responses of the nervous system and subjective scales of intensity. , 1967, Contributions to sensory physiology.

[9]  C. Coombs.  A theory of data. , 1965, Psychology Review.

[10]  W. Clark,et al.  Pain sensitivity and the report of pain: an introduction to sensory decision theory. , 1974 .

[11]  D. Turk,et al.  Latent structure of strategies used to cope with nociceptive stimulation. , 1984 .

[12]  J. Carroll,et al.  Multidimensional scaling reveals two dimensions of thermal pain. , 1986 .

[13]  D. Algom,et al.  Integration of noxious stimulation across separate somatosensory communications systems: a functional theory of pain. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Joseph L. Zinnes,et al.  Theory and Methods of Scaling. , 1958 .

[15]  S. Morley.  The dimensionality of verbal descriptors in Tursky's pain perception profile , 1989, Pain.

[16]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  A scale of apparent intensity of electric shock. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  Phipps Arabie,et al.  Three-way scaling and clustering. , 1987 .

[18]  R. Melzack.  The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods , 1975, PAIN.

[19]  R N Shepard,et al.  Multidimensional Scaling, Tree-Fitting, and Clustering , 1980, Science.

[20]  R. Shepard.  Representation of structure in similarity data: Problems and prospects , 1974 .

[21]  Ronald Dubner,et al.  Ratio scales of sensory and affective verbal pain descriptors , 1978, Pain.

[22]  J. Chang,et al.  Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition , 1970 .