Computational protein design promises to revolutionize protein engineering.

Natural evolution has produced an astounding array of proteins that perform the physical and chemical functions required for life on Earth. Although proteins can be reengineered to provide altered or novel functions, the utility of this approach is limited by the difficulty of identifying protein sequences that display the desired properties. Recently, advances in the field of computational protein design (CPD) have shown that molecular simulation can help to predict sequences with new and improved functions. In the past few years, CPD has been used to design protein variants with optimized specificity of binding to DNA, small molecules, peptides, and other proteins. Initial successes in enzyme design highlight CPD's unique ability to design function de novo. The use of CPD for the engineering of potential therapeutic agents has demonstrated its strength in real-life applications.

[1]  F. Richards,et al.  Construction of new ligand binding sites in proteins of known structure. I. Computer-aided modeling of sites with pre-defined geometry. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  J. Marvin,et al.  Conversion of a maltose receptor into a zinc biosensor by computational design , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Loren L Looger,et al.  Computational Design of a Biologically Active Enzyme , 2004, Science.

[4]  S L Mayo,et al.  Pairwise calculation of protein solvent-accessible surface areas. , 1998, Folding & design.

[5]  Drexler Ke,et al.  Molecular engineering: An approach to the development of general capabilities for molecular manipulation. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[7]  David Baker,et al.  PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 58:893–904 (2005) A “Solvated Rotamer ” Approach to Modeling Water- Mediated Hydrogen Bonds at Protein–Protein Interfaces , 2022 .

[8]  H. Hellinga,et al.  Periplasmic binding proteins: a versatile superfamily for protein engineering. , 2004, Current opinion in structural biology.

[9]  Homme W Hellinga,et al.  An empirical model for electrostatic interactions in proteins incorporating multiple geometry‐dependent dielectric constants , 2003, Proteins.

[10]  L. Looger,et al.  Computational design of receptor and sensor proteins with novel functions , 2003, Nature.

[11]  D. Baker,et al.  An orientation-dependent hydrogen bonding potential improves prediction of specificity and structure for proteins and protein-protein complexes. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.

[13]  Eugene A Zhukovsky,et al.  Inactivation of TNF Signaling by Rationally Designed Dominant-Negative TNF Variants , 2003, Science.

[14]  C Sander,et al.  Excluded volume approximation to protein-solvent interaction. The solvent contact model. , 1990, Biophysical journal.

[15]  P. Harbury,et al.  Automated design of specificity in molecular recognition , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[16]  D. Benjamin Gordon,et al.  Exact rotamer optimization for protein design , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[17]  M. Karplus,et al.  Effective energy function for proteins in solution , 1999, Proteins.

[18]  D. Baker,et al.  Computational redesign of endonuclease DNA binding and cleavage specificity , 2006, Nature.

[19]  Marc De Maeyer,et al.  The Dead-End Elimination Theorem: , 2000 .

[20]  Loren L Looger,et al.  Computational design of receptors for an organophosphate surrogate of the nerve agent soman. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Roland L. Dunbrack,et al.  Bayesian statistical analysis of protein side‐chain rotamer preferences , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[22]  D. Baker,et al.  Design of a Novel Globular Protein Fold with Atomic-Level Accuracy , 2003, Science.

[23]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Trading accuracy for speed: A quantitative comparison of search algorithms in protein sequence design. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  V. Rybin,et al.  Computer-aided design of a PDZ domain to recognize new target sequences , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.

[25]  Stephen L Mayo,et al.  Simple electrostatic model improves designed protein sequences , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[26]  S. L. Mayo,et al.  Probing the role of packing specificity in protein design. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  B. Lee,et al.  The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. , 1971, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  K E Drexler,et al.  Molecular engineering: An approach to the development of general capabilities for molecular manipulation. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Julia M. Shifman,et al.  Exploring the origins of binding specificity through the computational redesign of calmodulin , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  J R Desjarlais,et al.  De novo design of the hydrophobic cores of proteins , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[31]  C. Pabo.  Molecular technology: Designing proteins and peptides , 1983, Nature.

[32]  S. L. Mayo,et al.  Enzyme-like proteins by computational design , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  I. Lasters,et al.  Fast and accurate side‐chain topology and energy refinement (FASTER) as a new method for protein structure optimization , 2002, Proteins.

[34]  Benjamin D Allen,et al.  Combinatorial methods for small-molecule placement in computational enzyme design , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Julia M. Shifman,et al.  Modulating calmodulin binding specificity through computational protein design. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[36]  S. L. Mayo,et al.  Automated design of the surface positions of protein helices , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[37]  D. Baker,et al.  Computational design of a new hydrogen bond network and at least a 300-fold specificity switch at a protein-protein interface. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[38]  N. Pokala,et al.  Energy functions for protein design: adjustment with protein-protein complex affinities, models for the unfolded state, and negative design of solubility and specificity. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[39]  Stephen L. Mayo,et al.  Dramatic performance enhancements for the FASTER optimization algorithm , 2006, J. Comput. Chem..

[40]  M. Levitt,et al.  Conformation of amino acid side-chains in proteins. , 1978, Journal of molecular biology.