Eye care utilization by older Americans: the SEE Project. Salisbury Eye Evaluation.

OBJECTIVE To determine eye care utilization patterns among older Americans, particularly characterizing those who sought different types of providers, and the predictive factors for seeking eye care services in general and among those with diabetes and those with visual loss. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS The SEE Project, a population-based survey of 2520 persons aged 65 to 84 in Salisbury, Maryland, provided cross-sectional data on eye care use. Questions on eye care use, demographics, medical history, and other factors were asked on the home interview. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Use of an eye care provider in the previous year, with additional outcomes of use of different types of eye care providers. RESULTS Blacks were significantly less likely to see any type of eye care provider over 1 year: 50% versus 69% among whites. Those who reported having a vision problem, those with more education, and those in the older age groups were significantly more likely to see either an ophthalmologist or an optometrist. Diabetes and driving a car were predictive factors for seeing an ophthalmologist but not for seeing an optometrist. Self-report of diabetes and eye care problems, and being a current driver, were predictive of seeing an eye care professional among those with visual impairment. CONCLUSIONS Although blacks are known to be at greater risk for several age-related eye diseases, they are much less likely to see an eye care provider. Interventions that remove barriers to eye care services should be considered.

[1]  R. Klein,et al.  Factors associated with having eye examinations in persons with diabetes. , 1995, Archives of family medicine.

[2]  J. Javitt,et al.  Office visits to ophthalmologists and other physicians for eye care among the U.S. population, 1990. , 1995, Public health reports.

[3]  J. Javitt,et al.  Geographic Variation in Utilization of Cataract Surgery , 1995, Medical care.

[4]  Patterns of diabetic eye care by primary care physicians in the state of Indiana. , 1995, Ophthalmic epidemiology.

[5]  P. Whelton,et al.  Undetected eye disease in a primary care clinic population. , 1994, Archives of internal medicine.

[6]  J. Glanville,et al.  The efficacy of a multimedia educational campaign to increase the use of eye care services. , 1994, Ophthalmology.

[7]  J. Javitt,et al.  Eye care for elderly Americans with diabetes mellitus. Failure to meet current guidelines. , 1996, Ophthalmology.

[8]  J Katz,et al.  Racial differences in the cause-specific prevalence of blindness in east Baltimore. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  N. Dorward,et al.  'Correctable undetected visual acuity deficit' in patients aged 65 and over attending an accident and emergency department. , 1993, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  H. Taylor,et al.  Knowledge of glaucoma, and its relationship to self-care practices, in a population sample. , 1995, Australian and New Zealand journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  L B Ellwein,et al.  Use of eye care services among the 1991 Medicare population. , 1996, Ophthalmology.

[12]  G S Rubin,et al.  A comprehensive assessment of visual impairment in a population of older Americans. The SEE Study. Salisbury Eye Evaluation Project. , 1997, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[13]  L. Bourque,et al.  Does the public understand the differences between ophthalmologists and optometrists? , 1994, Ophthalmic epidemiology.

[14]  R. Glynn,et al.  Association of Visual Impairment with Mobility and Physical Function , 1994, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[15]  J. Javitt,et al.  Practice patterns of the office-based ophthalmologist. , 1994, Ophthalmic surgery.

[16]  K Bandeen-Roche,et al.  Function and visual impairment in a population-based study of older adults. The SEE project. Salisbury Eye Evaluation. , 1997, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.