Optimisation of heating, cooling and lighting energy performance of modular buildings in respect to location’s climatic specifics

Abstract Off-site construction can represent a potential solution for worldwide mass housing demand and has gained a lot of attention during the refugee crisis in Europe. In particular, modular construction is one of the most cost-effective off-site methods for various types of buildings. Its characteristics are cost -effectiveness, quality control and quick on-site assembly. The design challenge is to join the stated advantages with operational sustainability, which is susceptible to climate-determined and energy efficient design. Therefore, the purpose of this paper was to systematically evaluate energy and visual (daylight) efficiency of singular prefabricated modular unit. In order to emphasise the relevance of local climate, modular unit model was analysed at five different locations, monitoring cooling, heating and lighting energy use. Results showed similarities and differences between the analysed locations and implemented design measures. The conducted analysis included variation of orientation, window to wall ratio, window distribution, envelope thermal transmittance and glazing characteristics. Surprisingly, the results indicate substantial impact of artificial lighting on the total energy use. Therefore, emphasising a direct connection to the Spatial Daylight Autonomy (sDA) values of the modular units. With sDA values below 50%, lighting can represent up to half of the total energy use.

[1]  Thomas Froese,et al.  Analysis of Costs and Benefits of Panelized and Modular Prefabricated Homes , 2016 .

[2]  Holly Wasilowski Samuelson,et al.  Parametric Energy Simulation in Early Design: High-Rise Residential Buildings in Urban Contexts , 2016 .

[3]  Giuseppe Desogus,et al.  Bioclimatic lessons from Mediterranean vernacular architecture: The Sardinian case study , 2016 .

[4]  Sri Velamati,et al.  Feasibility, benefits and challenges of modular construction in high rise development in the United States : a developer's perspective , 2012 .

[5]  John Mardaljevic,et al.  Dynamic Daylight Performance Metrics for Sustainable Building Design , 2006 .

[6]  Jan Hensen,et al.  Considerations on design optimization criteria for windows providing low energy consumption and high visual comfort , 2012 .

[7]  B. Rudolf,et al.  World Map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated , 2006 .

[8]  Viktor Generalov,et al.  Modular Buildings in Modern Construction , 2016 .

[9]  Matthias Haase,et al.  Optimizing the configuration of a façade module for office buildings by means of integrated thermal and lighting simulations in a total energy perspective , 2013 .

[10]  Ronita Bardhan,et al.  Towards daylight inclusive bye-law: Daylight as an energy saving route for affordable housing in India , 2016 .

[11]  F. Goia.  Search for the optimal window-to-wall ratio in office buildings in different European climates and the implications on total energy saving potential , 2016 .

[12]  M. Shukuya,et al.  Exergetic issues of thermoregulation physiology in different climates , 2015 .

[13]  Gillian Frances Menzies,et al.  Life-Cycle Assessment and the Environmental Impact of Buildings: A Review , 2009 .

[14]  J. Bell,et al.  The importance of interior daylight distribution in buildings on overall energy performance , 1999 .

[15]  Alesš Krainer.  Passivhaus contra bioclimatic design , 2008 .

[16]  Concettina Marino,et al.  Does window-to-wall ratio have a significant effect on the energy consumption of buildings? A parametric analysis in Italian climate conditions , 2017 .

[17]  Y Saheb,et al.  Modernising Building Energy Codes , 2013 .

[18]  Himanshu Gupta,et al.  Developing a roadmap to overcome barriers to energy efficiency in buildings using best worst method , 2017 .

[19]  Åke Blomsterberg,et al.  Energy saving potential and strategies for electric lighting in future North European, low energy office buildings: A literature review , 2011 .

[20]  X. Zhang,et al.  The trends, promises and challenges of urbanisation in the world , 2016 .

[21]  Roman Kunič,et al.  Carbon footprint of thermal insulation materials in building envelopes , 2017 .

[22]  Kasun Hewage,et al.  Life cycle performance of modular buildings: A critical review , 2016 .

[23]  Yuehong Su,et al.  Daylight availability assessment and its potential energy saving estimation –A literature review , 2015 .

[24]  Mohamed Boubekri.  Daylighting, Architecture and Health: Building Design Strategies , 2008 .

[25]  D H W Li,et al.  Energy performance regression models for office buildings with daylighting controls , 2008 .

[26]  Timothy Oluseun Adekunle,et al.  Thermal comfort summertime temperatures and overheating in prefabricated timber housing , 2016 .

[27]  Janetta Mitchell McCoy,et al.  When buildings don't work: The role of architecture in human health. , 1998 .

[28]  Mateja Dovjak,et al.  Automatically controlled daylighting for visual and non-visual effects , 2011 .

[29]  Giuseppe Peter Vanoli,et al.  Optimization of building envelope design for nZEBs in Mediterranean climate: Performance analysis of residential case study , 2016 .

[30]  M. Košir,et al.  Can building energy performance. be predicted by a bioclimatic potential analysis? Case study of the Alpine-Adriatic region , 2017 .

[31]  Luisa F. Cabeza,et al.  Energy savings due to the use of PCM for relocatable lightweight buildings passive heating and cooling in different weather conditions , 2016 .

[32]  M. Shukuya,et al.  Connective thinking on building envelope – Human body exergy analysis , 2015 .

[33]  Mario Sassone,et al.  The early design stage of a building envelope: Multi-objective search through heating, cooling and lighting energy performance analysis , 2015 .