Population‐based priors in cardiac model personalisation for consistent parameter estimation in heterogeneous databases

Personalised cardiac models are a virtual representation of the patient heart, with parameter values for which the simulation fits the available clinical measurements. Models usually have a large number of parameters while the available data for a given patient are typically limited to a small set of measurements; thus, the parameters cannot be estimated uniquely. This is a practical obstacle for clinical applications, where accurate parameter values can be important. Here, we explore an original approach based on an algorithm called Iteratively Updated Priors (IUP), in which we perform successive personalisations of a full database through maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimation, where the prior probability at an iteration is set from the distribution of personalised parameters in the database at the previous iteration. At the convergence of the algorithm, estimated parameters of the population lie on a linear subspace of reduced (and possibly sufficient) dimension in which for each case of the database, there is a (possibly unique) parameter value for which the simulation fits the measurements. We first show how this property can help the modeller select a relevant parameter subspace for personalisation. In addition, since the resulting priors in this subspace represent the population statistics in this subspace, they can be used to perform consistent parameter estimation for cases where measurements are possibly different or missing in the database, which we illustrate with the personalisation of a heterogeneous database of 811 cases.

[1]  Hugo A. Katus,et al.  Robust Image-Based Estimation of Cardiac Tissue Parameters and Their Uncertainty from Noisy Data , 2014, MICCAI.

[2]  Helko Lehmann,et al.  euHeart: personalized and integrated cardiac care using patient-specific cardiovascular modelling , 2011, Interface Focus.

[3]  P. Tallec,et al.  An energy-preserving muscle tissue model: formulation and compatible discretizations , 2012 .

[4]  Maxime Sermesant,et al.  Highly reduced model of the cardiac function for fast simulation , 2016, 2016 IEEE 12th Image, Video, and Multidimensional Signal Processing Workshop (IVMSP).

[5]  Gabriel Balaban,et al.  High‐resolution data assimilation of cardiac mechanics applied to a dyssynchronous ventricle , 2017, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[6]  Kevin Burrage,et al.  Unlocking data sets by calibrating populations of models to data density: A study in atrial electrophysiology , 2017, Science Advances.

[7]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  Multifidelity-CMA: a multifidelity approach for efficient personalisation of 3D cardiac electromechanical models , 2017, Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology.

[8]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  Noname manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Fast Parameter Calibration of a Cardiac Electromechanical Model from Medical Images based on the Unscented Transform , 2012 .

[9]  Peter J. Hunter,et al.  An Overview of CellML 1.1, a Biological Model Description Language , 2003, Simul..

[10]  Nikolaus Hansen,et al.  The CMA Evolution Strategy: A Comparing Review , 2006, Towards a New Evolutionary Computation.

[11]  Nicolas Duchateau,et al.  Infarct localization from myocardial deformation: Prediction and uncertainty quantification by regression from a low-dimensional space. , 2016, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[12]  A. Huxley Muscle structure and theories of contraction. , 1957, Progress in biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[13]  Ellen Kuhl,et al.  The Living Heart Project: A robust and integrative simulator for human heart function. , 2014, European journal of mechanics. A, Solids.

[14]  A Noordergraaf,et al.  Analog studies of the human systemic arterial tree. , 1969, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  P. Taggart,et al.  Biophysical Modeling Predicts Ventricular Tachycardia Inducibility and Circuit Morphology: A Combined Clinical Validation and Computer Modeling Approach , 2016, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[16]  P. Roche,et al.  Macropinocytosis in phagocytes: regulation of MHC class-II-restricted antigen presentation in dendritic cells , 2015, Front. Physiol..

[17]  Gabriel Balaban,et al.  Estimating cardiac contraction through high resolution data assimilation of a personalized mechanical model , 2018, J. Comput. Sci..

[18]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  Patient-specific Electromechanical Models of the Heart for the Prediction of Pacing Acute Effects in Crt: a Preliminary Clinical Validation , 2022 .

[19]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  Efficient probabilistic model personalization integrating uncertainty on data and parameters: Application to eikonal-diffusion models in cardiac electrophysiology. , 2011, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[20]  Karen S. Frese,et al.  Towards Personalized Cardiology: Multi-Scale Modeling of the Failing Heart , 2015, PloS one.

[21]  Jack Lee,et al.  Multiphysics and multiscale modelling, data–model fusion and integration of organ physiology in the clinic: ventricular cardiac mechanics , 2016, Interface Focus.

[22]  M Caruel,et al.  Dimensional reductions of a cardiac model for effective validation and calibration , 2014, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.