Cohesion and performance in groups: a meta-analytic clarification of construct relations.

Previous meta-analytic examinations of group cohesion and performance have focused primarily on contextual factors. This study examined issues relevant to applied researchers by providing a more detailed analysis of the criterion domain. In addition, the authors reinvestigated the role of components of cohesion using more modern meta-analytic methods and in light of different types of performance criteria. The results of the authors' meta-analyses revealed stronger correlations between cohesion and performance when performance was defined as behavior (as opposed to outcome), when it was assessed with efficiency measures (as opposed to effectiveness measures), and as patterns of team workflow became more intensive. In addition, and in contrast to B. Mullen and C. Copper's (1994) meta-analysis, the 3 main components of cohesion were independently related to the various performance domains. Implications for organizations and future research on cohesion and performance are discussed.

[1]  L. Festinger.  Social pressures in informal groups : a study of human factors in housing / by Leon Festinger, Stanley Schachter and Kurt Back , 1950 .

[2]  L. Festinger.  Informal social communication. , 1950, Psychological review.

[3]  Daniel M. Goodacre,et al.  The Use of a Sociometric Test as a Predictor of Combat Unit Effectiveness , 1951 .

[4]  Donald W. Fiske,et al.  Criterion Problem , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[5]  Norman Gekoski.  Predicting group productivity. , 1952 .

[6]  John K. Hemphill,et al.  A comparison of three criteria of aircrew effectiveness in combat over Korea. , 1952 .

[7]  N. Gross,et al.  Studies of group behavior: Factors associated with the productivity of groups. , 1952 .

[8]  A. Zander,et al.  Group dynamics, research and theory , 1955 .

[9]  F E FIEDLER,et al.  Assumed similarity measures as predictors of team effectiveness. , 1953, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[10]  S. Seashore.  Group cohesiveness in the industrial work group , 1955 .

[11]  J. C. Flanagan.  The evaluation of methods in applied psychology and the problem of criteria. , 1956 .

[12]  T. M. Lodahl,et al.  Psychometric score patterns, social characteristics, and productivity of small industrial work groups. , 1961 .

[13]  David Cohen,et al.  Effect of group cohesiveness and training upon creative thinking , 1961 .

[14]  A. Lott,et al.  Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: a review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  B. Bass,et al.  Some effects on business gaming of previous quasi-T group affiliations. , 1967, The Journal of applied psychology.

[16]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[17]  J. Hackman.  Effects of task characteristics on group products , 1968 .

[18]  S. Marcia,et al.  Simulation and Games. , 1969 .

[19]  J. A. Peterson,et al.  Group Cohesiveness as a Determinant of Success and Member Satisfaction in Team Performance , 1971 .

[20]  E. T. Hellebrandt,et al.  Group cohesiveness, productivity, and strength of formal leadership. , 1972, The Journal of social psychology.

[21]  R. Stogdill.  Group productivity, drive, and cohesiveness , 1972 .

[22]  M. M. Chemers,et al.  Effects of group social structure on the success of basketball teams. , 1974, Research quarterly.

[23]  J. Hackman,et al.  Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration , 1975 .

[24]  Roger Bakeman,et al.  Cohesiveness and performance: Covariation and causality in an undersea environment , 1975 .

[25]  James H. Campbell,et al.  Information behavior: Groups with varying levels of interpersonal acquaintance , 1975 .

[26]  T. Mitchell,et al.  Leadership style, subordinate personality, and task type as predictors of performance and satisfaction with supervision. , 1976, The Journal of applied psychology.

[27]  C. H. Castore,et al.  A Longitudinal Field Investigation of the Impact of Group Composition on Group Performance and Cohesion. , 1976 .

[28]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization. , 1977 .

[29]  A. Bird.  Team Structure and Success as Related to Cohesiveness and Leadership , 1977 .

[30]  A. Carrón,et al.  An Analysis of the Cause-Effect Characteristics of Cohesiveness and Participation Motivation in Intercollegiate Hockey , 1977 .

[31]  Andrew J. DuBrin,et al.  6 – Small Group Behavior , 1977 .

[32]  Linda Louise Cotter,et al.  Group cohesiveness and team success among women's intercollegiate basketball teams , 1979 .

[33]  Boris Kabanoff,et al.  The effects of task type and cooperation upon group products and performance. , 1979 .

[34]  R. Niebuhr,et al.  Group Variables and Gaming Success , 1980 .

[35]  Aharon Tziner,et al.  Differential Effects of Group Cohesiveness Types: A Clarifying Overview. , 1982 .

[36]  A. Carrón,et al.  Cohesiveness in Sport Groups: Interpretations ani Considerations , 1982 .

[37]  E. Fodor,et al.  The power motive as an influence on group decision making. , 1982 .

[38]  B. Hatfield,et al.  Causality and the Cohesion-performance Relationship , 1982 .

[39]  Jean M. Williams,et al.  Causal Relationships Among Cohesion, Satisfaction, and Performance in Women's Intercollegiate Field Hockey Teams , 1982 .

[40]  A. Bedeian,et al.  Group Interactional Processes: Individual and Group Level Effects , 1983 .

[41]  Aharon Tziner,et al.  Ability as a moderator between cohesiveness and tank crews performance , 1983 .

[42]  A. Carrón,et al.  The Development of an Instrument to Assess Cohesion in Sport Teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire , 1985 .

[43]  Eva Constance Fox,et al.  Team cohesion, ability and coaches' leadership effectiveness as predictors of success in women's intercollegiate softball , 1985 .

[44]  J. F. Preble,et al.  Group Processes and Performance in A Complex Business Simulation , 1985 .

[45]  Erich Kirchler,et al.  The influence of member status differences and task type on group consensus and member position change , 1986 .

[46]  Carol E. Lorenz.  The influence of expectations and cohesiveness on the performance of small groups : a study of quality circles , 1986 .

[47]  Paul R. Sackett,et al.  On seeking moderator variables in the meta-analysis of correlational data: A Monte Carlo investigation of statistical power and resistance to Type I error. , 1986 .

[48]  R. Keller,et al.  Predictors of the Performance of Project Groups in R & D Organizations , 1986 .

[49]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  Meta-analysis for integrating study outcomes: A Monte Carlo study of its susceptibility to Type I and Type II errors. , 1987 .

[50]  D. Gill.  Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology , 1987 .

[51]  C. Hendrick,et al.  Group Processes and Intergroup Relations , 1987 .

[52]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Team Cohesion Effects on Business Game Performance , 1987 .

[53]  S. Zaccaro,et al.  The Effects of Task and Interpersonal Cohesiveness on Performance of a Disjunctive Group Task1 , 1988 .

[54]  Stephen J. Zaccaro,et al.  Cohesiveness and Performance on an Additive Task: Evidence for Multidimensionality. , 1988 .

[55]  R. G. Gowda.  Influence of individual characteristics and group cohesiveness on programmer productivity , 1988 .

[56]  Paul W. Paese,et al.  Validity generalization and hypothetical reliability distributions: A test of the Schmidt-Hunter procedure. , 1988 .

[57]  P. E. Mudrack,et al.  Group Cohesiveness and Productivity: A Closer Look , 1989 .

[58]  Charles N. Greene,et al.  Cohesion and Productivity in Work Groups , 1989 .

[59]  J. Gosenpud,et al.  The Prediction of Simulation Performance as It Is Affected By Time , 1989 .

[60]  N. Raju,et al.  An empirical Monte Carlo test of the accuracy of the correlation, covariance, and regression slope models for assessing validity generalization. , 1989 .

[61]  John P. Wanous,et al.  The role of judgment calls in meta-analysis. , 1989 .

[62]  Israel D. Nebenzahl,et al.  Group Interaction and Business Game Performance , 1990 .

[63]  J. George,et al.  Understanding prosocial behavior, sales performance, and turnover: A group-level analysis in a service context. , 1990 .

[64]  Joann Keyton,et al.  Redefining Cohesiveness in Groups , 1990 .

[65]  Ellen M. Whitener,et al.  Confusion of confidence intervals and credibility intervals in meta-analysis. , 1990 .

[66]  John P. Campbell,et al.  Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. , 1990 .

[67]  D. Wegner,et al.  Transactive memory in close relationships. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[68]  C. R. Evans,et al.  Group Cohesion and Performance , 1991 .

[69]  A new meta-analytic approach. , 1991 .

[70]  Leonard Wong.  The effects of cohesion on organizational performance: a test of two models , 1992 .

[71]  K. Murphy.  Personnel Selection in Organizations , 1992 .

[72]  Peter Villanova,et al.  The criterion problem: 1917–1992. , 1992 .

[73]  Stephen M. Colarelli,et al.  Sociometric and ability-based assignment to work groups: Some implications for personnel selection , 1992 .

[74]  J. Cornwell,et al.  Monte Carlo Comparisons of Three Tests for Homogeneity of Independent Correlations , 1993 .

[75]  W. Borman,et al.  Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance , 1993 .

[76]  Cheri Ostroff,et al.  Comparing Correlations Based on Individual-Level and Aggregated Data , 1993 .

[77]  Meni Koslowsky,et al.  On the efficacy of credibility intervals as indicators of moderator effects in meta-analytic research , 1993 .

[78]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Top Management Team Demography and Process: The Role of Social Integration and Communication , 1994 .

[79]  Ingram Olkin,et al.  Stochastically dependent effect sizes. , 1994 .

[80]  K. Klein,et al.  Levels Issues in Theory Development, Data Collection, and Analysis , 1994 .

[81]  B. Mullen,et al.  The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. , 1994 .

[82]  K. Jehn.  ENHANCING EFFECTIVENESS: AN INVESTIGATION OF ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF VALUE‐BASED INTRAGROUP CONFLICT , 1994 .

[83]  S. Zaccaro,et al.  Task Cohesion as a Facilitator of Team Decision Making Under Temporal Urgency , 1995 .

[84]  C. R. Evans,et al.  The Structure of Group Cohesion , 1995 .

[85]  L. Hedges,et al.  The Handbook of Research Synthesis , 1995 .

[86]  H. Klein,et al.  Two Investigations of the Relationships among Group Goals, Goal Commitment, Cohesion, and Performance , 1995 .

[87]  Michael J. Burke,et al.  Age discrimination in simulated employment contexts: An integrative analysis. , 1995 .

[88]  M. Petty,et al.  Team-Member Exchange Under Team and Traditional Management , 1995 .

[89]  B. Lilly,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF CONFLICT, TRUST, AND TASK COMMITMENT ON PROJECT TEAM PERFORMANCE , 1996 .

[90]  Daryl Gerald Arroyo.  Cohesion, performance, and satisfaction in the co-acting sport of collegiate wrestling , 1996 .

[91]  Kevin R. Murphy,et al.  Individual differences and behavior in organizations , 1996 .

[92]  H. Matheson,et al.  Group cohesion of female intercollegiate coacting and interacting teams across a competitive season. , 1996 .

[93]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  Task and aggregation issues in the analysis and assessment of team performance. , 1997 .

[94]  Derrick J. Neal,et al.  Group Competitiveness and Cohesion in a Business Simulation , 1997 .

[95]  Michael Ahearne,et al.  Moderating Effects of Goal Acceptance on the Relationship between Group Cohesiveness and Productivity , 1997 .

[96]  S. Scullen.  When ratings from one source have been averaged, but ratings from another source have not : Problems and solutions , 1997 .

[97]  V. Wekselberg,et al.  A Multifaceted Concept of Group Maturity and Its Measurement and Relationship to Group Performance , 1997 .

[98]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  Interpersonal relationships and task performance: An examination of mediation processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. , 1997 .

[99]  Nathan Bennett,et al.  Does Work Group Cohesiveness Affect Individuals' Performance and Organizational Commitment? , 1998 .

[100]  Claus W. Langfred.  Is Group Cohesiveness a Double-Edged Sword? , 1998 .

[101]  S. Karau,et al.  Group cohesiveness and social loafing: Effects of a social interaction manipulation on individual motivation within groups. , 1998 .

[102]  Steve H. Barr,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes the Impact of Perceived Loafing and Collective Efficacy on Group Goal Processes and Group Performance , 2022 .

[103]  D. Harrison,et al.  Beyond Relational Demography: Time and the Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Work Group Cohesion , 1998 .

[104]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  THE SUBSTANTIVE NATURE OF PERFORMANCE VARIABILITY: PREDICTING INTERINDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN INTRAINDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE , 1998 .

[105]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. , 1998 .

[106]  A. Hollingshead.  Communication, Learning, and Retrieval in Transactive Memory Systems☆☆☆ , 1998 .

[107]  H. Cooper.  Synthesizing Research: A Guide for Literature Reviews , 1998 .

[108]  Paul E. Tesluk,et al.  Overcoming roadblocks to effectiveness: Incorporating management of performance barriers into models of work group effectiveness. , 1999 .

[109]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  Beyond Self-Management: Antecedents and Consequences of Team Empowerment , 1999 .

[110]  Joan Harman,et al.  A Quantitative Integration of the Military Cohesion Literature , 1999 .

[111]  Traci Y. Craig,et al.  Group cohesiveness and creative performance. , 1999 .

[112]  Michael J. Burke,et al.  An examination of service-related antecedents to retail store performance , 1999 .

[113]  Claus W. Langfred.  The paradox of self‐management: individual and group autonomy in work groups , 2000 .

[114]  J. Mathieu,et al.  The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[115]  S. Carless,et al.  The Measurement of Cohesion in Work Teams , 2000 .

[116]  C. Wilderom,et al.  Organizational Culture as a Predictor of organizational Performance. , 2000 .

[117]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Team Structure and Performance: Assessing the Mediating Role of Intrateam Process and the Moderating Role of Task Type , 2000 .

[118]  N. Ashkanasy,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate , 2000 .

[119]  W. Borman,et al.  Contextual performance and teamwork: Implications for staffing , 2000 .

[120]  A. Hollingshead.  Perceptions of Expertise and Transactive Memory in Work Relationships , 2000 .

[121]  E.,et al.  GROUPS : INTERACTION AND PERFORMANCE , 2001 .

[122]  M. Hoegl,et al.  Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects , 2001 .

[123]  A. Carrón,et al.  Cohesion and performance in sport: a meta analysis. , 2002 .

[124]  P. Radhakrishnan,et al.  The Relation between Allocentrism and Perceptions of Ingroups , 2002 .

[125]  Piers Steel,et al.  Comparing meta-analytic moderator estimation techniques under realistic conditions. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[126]  Michael J. Burke,et al.  The impact of group process variables on the effectiveness of distance collaboration groups , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[127]  R. Landis,et al.  Methodological and conceptual challenges in conducting and interpreting meta-analyses. , 2003 .

[128]  Michael J. Strube,et al.  Validity Generalization: A Critical Review , 2004 .

[129]  R. Cheloha,et al.  The of a Development , 2004 .

[130]  Jon W. Blades.  Rules for Leadership: Improving Unit Performance , 2005 .

[131]  M. D. Dunnette.  Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2005 .