Comparison of implicit solvent models for the simulation of protein–surface interactions

Empirical force field‐based molecular simulations can provide valuable atomistic‐level insights into protein–surface interactions in aqueous solution. While the implicit treatment of solvation effects is desired as a means of improving simulation efficiency, existing implicit solvent models were primarily developed for the simulation of peptide or protein behavior in solution alone, and thus may not be appropriate for protein interactions with synthetic material surfaces. The objective of this research was to calculate the change in free energy as a function of surface–separation distance for peptide–surface interactions using different empirical force field‐based implicit solvation models (ACE, ASP, EEF1, and RDIE with the CHARMM 19 force field), and to compare these results with the same calculations conducted using density functional theory (DFT) combined with the self‐consistent reaction field (SCRF) implicit solvation model. These comparisons show that distinctly different types of behavior are predicted with each implicit solvation method, with ACE providing the best overall agreement with DFT/SCRF calculations. These results also identify areas where ACE is in need of improvement for this application and provide a basis for subsequent parameter refinement. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem, 2006

[1]  J. R. Long,et al.  Structure and dynamics of hydrated statherin on hydroxyapatite as determined by solid-state NMR. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[2]  C. Brooks,et al.  Recent advances in the development and application of implicit solvent models in biomolecule simulations. , 2004, Current opinion in structural biology.

[3]  Shaoyi Jiang,et al.  Molecular simulation study of water interactions with oligo (ethylene glycol)-terminated alkanethiol self-assembled monolayers. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[4]  A. Vermeer,et al.  Structural changes of IgG induced by heat treatment and by adsorption onto a hydrophobic Teflon surface studied by circular dichroism spectroscopy. , 1998, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[5]  G. Somorjai,et al.  Molecular packing of lysozyme, fibrinogen, and bovine serum albumin on hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces studied by infrared-visible sum frequency generation and fluorescence microscopy. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[6]  Stephen E. Creager,et al.  Contact-Angle Titrations of Mixed .omega.-Mercaptoalkanoic Acid/Alkanethiol Monolayers on Gold. Reactive vs Nonreactive Spreading, and Chain Length Effects on Surface pKa Values , 1994 .

[7]  Clayton J. Radke,et al.  Direct Imaging of Lysozyme Adsorption onto Mica by Atomic Force Microscopy , 2002 .

[8]  K. Dill,et al.  A View of the Hydrophobic Effect , 2002 .

[9]  B Honig,et al.  Reconciling the magnitude of the microscopic and macroscopic hydrophobic effects. , 1991, Science.

[10]  Robert A Latour,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of peptide-surface interactions. , 2005, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[11]  Shaoyi Jiang,et al.  Strong resistance of phosphorylcholine self-assembled monolayers to protein adsorption: insights into nonfouling properties of zwitterionic materials. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[12]  Abraham Ulman,et al.  Packing and Molecular Orientation of Alkanethiol Monolayers on Gold Surfaces , 1989 .

[13]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. , 1998, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[14]  Bernard Sebille,et al.  Modeling of Protein Adsorption on Polymer Surfaces. Computation of Adsorption Potential , 1995 .

[15]  Christian Bartels,et al.  Solution conformations of structured peptides: continuum electrostatics versus distance-dependent dielectric functions , 1999 .

[16]  T. Lazaridis,et al.  Potentials of mean force between ionizable amino acid side chains in water. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[17]  F. Young Biochemistry , 1955, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[18]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  The interaction of proteins with solid surfaces. , 2004, Current opinion in structural biology.

[19]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  An Improved Empirical Potential Energy Function for Molecular Simulations of Phospholipids , 2000 .

[20]  Sylvie Le Borgne,et al.  Biotechnological processes for the refining of petroleum , 2003 .

[21]  Robert A. Latour,et al.  Theoretical analysis of adsorption thermodynamics for hydrophobic peptide residues on SAM surfaces of varying functionality , 2002 .

[22]  Fabio Ganazzoli,et al.  Simulation study of the interaction of some albumin subdomains with a flat graphite surface , 2003 .

[23]  Sergey A. Piletsky,et al.  Application of natural receptors in sensors and assays. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.

[24]  M. Karplus,et al.  Effective energy function for proteins in solution , 1999, Proteins.

[25]  A. D. McLachlan,et al.  Solvation energy in protein folding and binding , 1986, Nature.

[26]  Daniel Forciniti,et al.  Monte Carlo simulations of peptide adsorption on solid surfaces (Monte Carlo simulations of peptide adsorption) , 2001 .

[27]  Robert A. Latour,et al.  Molecular modeling of biomaterial surfaces , 1999 .

[28]  W. Norde,et al.  Influence of hydrophobic Teflon particles on the structure of amyloid beta-peptide. , 2003, Biomacromolecules.

[29]  W. C. Still,et al.  Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamics , 1990 .

[30]  J S Sharp,et al.  Surface denaturation and amyloid fibril formation of insulin at model lipid-water interfaces. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[31]  T. Simonson,et al.  Protein molecular dynamics with the generalized born/ACE solvent model , 2001, Proteins.

[32]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Atomic solvation parameters applied to molecular dynamics of proteins in solution , 1992, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[33]  J. Valverde Molecular Modelling: Principles and Applications , 2001 .

[34]  A. Goldstein,et al.  Effect of adsorbed fibronectin concentration on cell adhesion and deformation under shear on hydrophobic surfaces. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[35]  Robert A. Latour,et al.  Adsorption Thermodynamics Of A Mid-Chain Peptide Residue On Functionalized SAM Surfaces Using SPR , 2005 .

[36]  Abraham M. Lenhoff,et al.  Influence of Structural Details in Modeling Electrostatically Driven Protein Adsorption , 1997 .

[37]  P. Privalov,et al.  Contribution of hydration to protein folding thermodynamics. II. The entropy and Gibbs energy of hydration. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[38]  A. Leach Molecular Modelling: Principles and Applications , 1996 .

[39]  Fabio Ganazzoli,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulation of the adsorption of a fibronectin module on a graphite surface. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[40]  R. Misra,et al.  Biomaterials , 2008 .

[41]  Charles A Haynes,et al.  Mesoscopic dynamic Monte Carlo simulations of the adsorption of proteinlike HP chains within laterally constricted spaces. , 2005, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[42]  Larry L Hench,et al.  A theoretical analysis of the thermodynamic contributions for the adsorption of individual protein residues on functionalized surfaces. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[43]  M. Karplus,et al.  A Comprehensive Analytical Treatment of Continuum Electrostatics , 1996 .

[44]  Johnson,et al.  Adsorbed Layers of Ferritin at Solid and Fluid Interfaces Studied by Atomic Force Microscopy. , 2000, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[45]  K. Park,et al.  Calculation of solvation interaction energies for protein adsorption on polymer surfaces. , 1991, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[46]  B. Honig,et al.  New Model for Calculation of Solvation Free Energies: Correction of Self-Consistent Reaction Field Continuum Dielectric Theory for Short-Range Hydrogen-Bonding Effects , 1996 .

[47]  Stephen R. Euston,et al.  Computer simulation of proteins: adsorption, gelation and self-association , 2004 .

[48]  M. Klein,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of a protein on hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[49]  Joel J. P. C. Rodrigues,et al.  Fuel Process. Technol. , 2005 .

[50]  Shaoyi Jiang,et al.  Monte Carlo simulations of antibody adsorption and orientation on charged surfaces. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[51]  A. Lenhoff,et al.  Analysis of ordered arrays of adsorbed lysozyme by scanning tunneling microscopy. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[52]  Kinam Park,et al.  Protein interaction with surfaces: Separation distance‐dependent interaction energies , 1994 .

[53]  Elazer R Edelman,et al.  Effect of pre‐adsorbed proteins on attachment, proliferation, and function of endothelial cells , 2002, Journal of cellular physiology.

[54]  R. Tilton,et al.  Spontaneous Reconfiguration of Adsorbed Lysozyme Layers Observed by Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence with a pH-Sensitive Fluorophore , 1996 .

[55]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[56]  P. Sridhar,et al.  Design of affinity membrane bioseparations , 1996 .

[57]  Fredrik Carlsson,et al.  Lysozyme adsorption to charged surfaces : A Monte Carlo Study , 2004 .

[58]  B. Honig,et al.  Accurate First Principles Calculation of Molecular Charge Distributions and Solvation Energies from Ab Initio Quantum Mechanics and Continuum Dielectric Theory , 1994 .

[59]  Paul R Van Tassel,et al.  Surface-induced conformational changes in lattice model proteins by Monte Carlo simulation. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[60]  Xin Xu,et al.  From The Cover: The X3LYP extended density functional for accurate descriptions of nonbond interactions, spin states, and thermochemical properties. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[61]  W. Pitt,et al.  Water structure around enkephalin near a GeO2 surface: a molecular dynamics study. , 2002, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[62]  Jeffry D. Madura,et al.  A Brownian Dynamics Study of the Initial Stages of Hen Egg-White Lysozyme Adsorption at a Solid Interface , 2001 .

[63]  Brian J. Teppen,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of the adsorption of proteins on clay mineral surfaces , 2000 .

[64]  Frank Caruso,et al.  Preparation of enzyme multilayers on colloids for biocatalysis , 2000 .

[65]  Robert A Latour,et al.  Molecular simulation to characterize the adsorption behavior of a fibrinogen gamma-chain fragment. , 2005, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[66]  Shaoyi Jiang,et al.  Molecular Simulation Studies of the Orientation and Conformation of Cytochrome c Adsorbed on Self-Assembled Monolayers , 2004 .

[67]  George M. Whitesides,et al.  Adsorption of Proteins to Hydrophobic Sites on Mixed Self-Assembled Monolayers† , 2003 .

[68]  K. Park,et al.  Protein adsorption on polymer surfaces: calculation of adsorption energies. , 1990, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[69]  M. Karplus,et al.  Solution conformations and thermodynamics of structured peptides: molecular dynamics simulation with an implicit solvation model. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.