How Many Leads Are Necessary for a Reliable Reconstruction of Surface Potentials During Atrial Fibrillation?

In this study, we aimed at determining how many leads are necessary for accurately reconstructing ECG potentials during atrial fibrillation (AF) on the body surface. Although the standard ECG is appropriate for the detection of this arrhythmia, its accuracy for extracting other diagnostic features or constructing surface potential maps may not be optimal. We evaluated the suitability of the standard ECG in AF and proposed a new lead system for improving the information content of AF signals in limited lead systems. We made use of 64-lead body surface potential mapping recordings of 17 patients during AF and 18 healthy subjects. Lead selection was performed by making use of a lead selection algorithm proposed by Lux, and error curves were calculated for increasing number of selected leads for QRS complexes and P waves from healthy subjects and AF signals. From our results, at least 23 leads are needed in order to have the same degree of accuracy in the derivation of AF waves as the 12-lead ECG for a normal QRS complex (25% error). The 12-lead ECG allows a reconstruction of surface potentials with 53% error. If a limited lead set is to be chosen, a repositioning of only four electrodes from the standard ECG reduces reconstruction error in 11%. This repositioning of electrodes may include more right anterior electrodes and one posterior electrode.

[1]  I. Menown,et al.  Optimizing the initial 12-lead electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. , 2000, European heart journal.

[2]  Chris D. Nugent,et al.  Selection of optimal recording sites for limited lead body surface potential mapping: A sequential selection based approach , 2006, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[3]  J. Cheng,et al.  Body surface Laplacian mapping of atrial depolarization in healthy human subjects , 2002, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[4]  Leif Sörnmo,et al.  Detection and feature extraction of atrial tachyarrhythmias. A three stage method of time-frequency analysis. , 2006, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[5]  I. Menown,et al.  Body surface mapping improves early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with chest pain and left bundle branch block , 2003, Heart.

[6]  K Tungsanga,et al.  New electrocardiographic leads and the procainamide test for the detection of the Brugada sign in sudden unexplained death syndrome survivors and their relatives. , 2002, European heart journal.

[7]  Chris D Nugent,et al.  Optimizing the 12-lead electrocardiogram: a data driven approach to locating alternative recording sites. , 2007, Journal of electrocardiology.

[8]  Jie Cheng,et al.  Potential role of body surface ECG mapping for localization of atrial fibrillation trigger sites. , 2004, Journal of electrocardiology.

[9]  Pablo Laguna,et al.  Chapter 6 – The Electrocardiogram—A Brief Background , 2005 .

[10]  Jan A. Kors,et al.  How many electrodes and where? A [ldquo ]poldermodel[rdquo ] for electrocardiography , 2002 .

[11]  David Moratal,et al.  Estimation of atrial fibrillatory wave from single-lead atrial fibrillation electrocardiograms using principal component analysis concepts , 2005, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[12]  Tohru Ohe,et al.  Usefulness of body surface mapping to differentiate patients with Brugada syndrome from patients with asymptomatic Brugada syndrome. , 2004, Acta medica Okayama.

[13]  F Kornreich,et al.  II. Diagnosis of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Myocardial Infarction from “Total’ Surface Waveform Information , 1973 .

[14]  J. .. Abildskov,et al.  Clinically Practical Lead Systems for Improved Electrocardiography: Comparison with Precordial Grids and Conventional Lead Systems , 1979, Circulation.

[15]  Vincent Jacquemet,et al.  Vectorcardiographic lead systems for the characterization of atrial fibrillation. , 2007, Journal of electrocardiology.

[16]  I. Menown,et al.  Comparison of the 80-lead body surface map to physician and to 12-lead electrocardiogram in detection of acute myocardial infarction. , 2003, The American journal of cardiology.

[17]  A SippensGroenewegen,et al.  Body surface mapping during pacing at multiple sites in the human atrium: P-wave morphology of ectopic right atrial activation. , 1998, Circulation.

[18]  G. van Herpen,et al.  How many electrodes and where? A "poldermodel" for electrocardiography. , 2002, Journal of electrocardiology.

[19]  L. Sornmo,et al.  Detection and feature extraction of atrial tachyarrhythmias , 2006, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[20]  B Drew,et al.  Comparison of 18-lead ECG and selected body surface potential mapping leads in determining maximally deviated ST lead and efficacy in detecting acute myocardial ischemia during coronary occlusion. , 1999, Journal of electrocardiology.

[21]  P M Rautaharju,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative analysis of characteristic body surface potential map features in anterior and inferior myocardial infarction. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.

[22]  J. A. Abildskov,et al.  Limited Lead Selection for Estimation of Body Surface Potential Maps in Electrocardiography , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  R. Lux,et al.  Derivation of an optimal lead set for measuring ectopic atrial activation from the pulmonary veins by using body surface mapping. , 2000, Journal of electrocardiology.

[24]  Martin Borggrefe,et al.  Body surface potential mapping in patients with Brugada syndrome: right precordial ST segment variations and reverse changes in left precordial leads. , 2002, Cardiovascular research.

[25]  R. Macleod,et al.  Useful Lessons from Body Surface Mapping , 1998, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[26]  Kazuhide Takeuchi,et al.  Utility of Right Precordial Leads at Higher Intercostal Space Positions to Diagnose Brugada Syndrome , 2002, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[27]  Francisco Castells,et al.  Noninvasive Mapping of Human Atrial Fibrillation , 2009, Cardiovascular Electrophysiology.

[28]  Francisco Castells,et al.  Evaluation of lead selection methods for optimal reconstruction of body surface potentials. , 2008, Journal of electrocardiology.

[29]  Francisco Castells,et al.  Lead selection methods from multilead electrocardiographic recordings , 2007 .

[30]  P M Rautaharju,et al.  Identification of First Acute Q Wave and Non‐Q Wave Myocardial Infarction by Multivariate Analysis of Body Surface Potential Maps , 1991, Circulation.

[31]  J. A. Abildskov,et al.  Use of Orthogonal Expansions for Representing Body Surface Potential Maps , 1986 .

[32]  J. Millet,et al.  Q wave myocardial intarction analysed by body surface potential mapping , 2004, Computers in Cardiology, 2004.

[33]  Vincent Jacquemet,et al.  Adaptation of the standard 12-lead electrocardiogram system dedicated to the analysis of atrial fibrillation. , 2007, Journal of electrocardiology.

[34]  Willis J. Tompkins,et al.  A Real-Time QRS Detection Algorithm , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[35]  R L Lux,et al.  Electrocardiographic body surface potential mapping. , 1982, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[36]  David Moratal,et al.  Analysis of the extension of Q-waves after infarction with body surface map: relationship with infarct size. , 2006, International journal of cardiology.

[37]  Chris D. Nugent,et al.  Optimal Electrocardiographic Lead Systems: Practical Scenarios in Smart Clothing and Wearable Health Systems , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[38]  Leif Sörnmo,et al.  Electroatriography - time-frequency analysis of atrial fibrillation from modified 12-lead ECG configurations for improved diagnosis and therapy. , 2007, Medical hypotheses.

[39]  R Hoekema,et al.  The Number of Independent Signals in Body Surface Maps , 1999, Methods of Information in Medicine.