A New High Performance CA Resist for E-beam Lithography

Three major lithographic applications have emerged for electron beam exposure tools: optical mask fabrication, direct writing for device fabrication, and more recently projection e-beam printing. The traditional mask making process uses poly(butenesulfone) resist. A wet etch process was adopted to generate patterns on chrome. Recently, shrinking dimensions, optical proximity correction features, and the complexity of phase shift masks have forced the industry to a chrome dry etch process. ZEP, a poly(methyl α-chloroacrylate-co-α-methylstyrene) based resist, has been well accepted for most of the >180 nm device mask making. The acceptance of ZEP comes in spite of its low contrast, marginal etch resistance, organic solvent development, and concerns of resist heating associated with its high dose requirements. These issues have spawned interest in using chemically amplified resist (CAR) systems for direct write and mask making applications. We have developed a high contrast resist based on ketal protecting groups, KRS-XE, which is robust against airborne contamination and can be used for all forms of e-beam exposure in both chrome mask and silicon processing. This high contrast resist is processed with aqueous base developer and has a wide bake latitude. The development of KRS-XE has provided the capability of fabricating chrome masks for future generation (

[1]  Naoya Hayashi,et al.  Application of chemically amplified resists to photomask fabrication , 1995, Photomask and Next Generation Lithography Mask Technology.

[2]  W. Waskiewicz,et al.  Critical dimension control at stitched subfield boundaries in a high-throughput SCALPEL® system , 1998 .

[3]  Development of positive electron‐beam resist for 50 kV electron‐beam direct‐writing lithography , 1993 .

[4]  C. Willson,et al.  Chemical amplification in the design of dry developing resist materials , 1983 .

[5]  Masaya Notomi,et al.  Quantum Wire Fabrication by E-Beam Elithography Using High-Resolution and High-Sensitivity E-Beam Resist ZEP-520 , 1992 .

[6]  Sergey V. Babin Comparison of writing strategies subject to resist heating , 1998, Photomask Technology.

[7]  Nobufumi Atoda,et al.  Mechanism of Resist Pattern Collapse during Development Process , 1993 .

[8]  Warren K. Waskiewicz,et al.  Electron-optics method for high-throughput in a SCALPEL system: preliminary analysis , 1998 .

[9]  Hiroshi Ito,et al.  Investigation of Deep UV Resists by NMR: Residual Casting Solvents, Chemistries, and PAG Decomposition in film , 1999 .

[10]  William D. Hinsberg,et al.  Quantitation of airborne chemical contamination of chemically amplified resists using radiochemical analysis , 1992, Advanced Lithography.

[11]  Allen H. Gabor,et al.  193 nm single layer resist strategies, concepts, and recent results , 1998 .

[12]  J. Moon,et al.  Additive oxygen effects in Cl2 plasma etching of chrome films , 1999 .

[13]  Seong-Woon Choi,et al.  Evaluation of the practical use of GHOST technique for various e-beam resists , 1998, Photomask Technology.

[14]  Charles A. Sauer,et al.  180-nm mask fabrication process using ZEP 7000, multipass gray, GHOST, and dry etch for MEBES 5000 , 1998, Photomask Technology.