Who comes when: personality differences in early and later participation in a university subject pool

This study used a comprehensive measure of personality, the NEO PI-R to assess the broad traits and narrower facets of personality that predict time of participation in a University subject pool across one semester. A variety of additional demographic and academic variables (e.g. grade point average, semesters completed, current number of semester credits being taken, total degree credits earned) were investigated as they related to both time of participation and enjoyment of participation. Significant associations were found that replicated previous research (e.g. extraverts participate later; compliant persons participate earlier) and previously unreported associations were identified (e.g. openness and its facets correlate significantly with time of participation). Suggestions as to how to avoid these potential experimental confounds and increase truer random assignment of subject pool participants to experimental research are made.

[1]  B. Underwood,et al.  Verbal learning as related to point of time in the school term , 1964 .

[2]  L. Eyde,et al.  Psychological testing and psychological assessment. A review of evidence and issues. , 2001, The American psychologist.

[3]  E. Donnerstein,et al.  Some implications for psychological research of early versus late term participation by college subjects , 1974 .

[4]  Changes in subject performance during the semester: An empirical investigation , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  Sandra D. Wilson,et al.  Some differences among students volunteering as research subjects , 1981 .

[6]  R. Holden,et al.  TEMPORAL PERSONALITY VARIATIONS AMONG PARTICIPANTS FROM A UNIVERSITY SUBJECT POOL , 1987 .

[7]  Robert P. Abelson,et al.  A Variance Explanation Paradox: When a Little is a Lot , 1985 .

[8]  G. Moskowitz,et al.  Individual Differences In Experiment Participation: Structure, Autonomy, and the Time of the Semeste , 1995 .

[9]  Point-of-Time Effects Across the Semester: Is There a Sampling Bias? , 1998 .

[10]  R. Larsen,et al.  Person x situation interactions: choice of situations and congruence response models. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  R. Larsen,et al.  Individual differences in entrainment of mood to the weekly calendar. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  H. Cooper,et al.  Do Students with Different Characteristics Take Part in Psychology Experiments at Different Times of the Semester , 1991 .

[13]  Harry L. Hom,et al.  A Methodological Note , 1987, Police Visibility.

[14]  R. O’Neill,et al.  Orality and latency of volunteering to serve as experimental subjects. , 1981, Journal of personality assessment.

[15]  R. Abelson.  Statistics As Principled Argument , 1995 .

[16]  M. Zuckerman,et al.  Sensation seeking and volunteering for sensory deprivation and hypnosis experiments. , 1967, Journal of consulting psychology.

[17]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[18]  Deborah A. Prentice,et al.  When small effects are impressive , 1992 .

[19]  M. Strube.  Time Urgency and Type a Behavior , 1982 .

[20]  H. J. Liberty.  The relationship between extraversion and time of data collection , 1993 .