EVALUATION OF A MULTIPLE‐SPECIES APPROACH TO MONITORING SPECIES AT THE ECOREGIONAL SCALE

Monitoring is required of land managers and conservation practitioners to assess the success of management actions. ''Shortcuts'' are sought to reduce monitoring costs, most often consisting of the selection of a small number of species that are closely monitored to represent the status of many associated species and environmental correlates. Assumptions associated with such shortcuts have been challenged, yet alternative ap- proaches remain scant. We evaluated an approach that departs significantly from the ap- proach of selecting a few representative species. We explored two primary assertions: (1) that a coordinated multiple-species monitoring effort that collects presence-absence data on a broad range of species is a robust alternative to a few intensive single-species efforts, and (2) that the vertebrate species expected to be detected using this approach are numerous and diverse enough to represent all vertebrate species. We simulated monitoring the ver- tebrate species pool on an existing sample grid across the 7 million ha of public lands in the Sierra Nevada (USA) ecoregion. Based on the use of eight standard presence-absence protocols, we estimated the number of vertebrate species (excluding fish) with an adequate number of sample points within their range to detect $20% relative change in the proportion of points with detections between two points in time. We estimated that adequate detections would be obtained for 76% of the 465 vertebrate species, including 83% of all birds, 76% of all mammals, 65% of all reptiles, and 44% of all amphibians. Detection adequacy varied among life-history and ecological groups, but .50% of the species were adequately detected in every group with the exception of three groups: rare species, endemic species, and species of concern (33%, 24%, and 47% of associated species adequately detected, respectively). A multiple-species monitoring approach represents an effective and feasible alternative to the challenges of large-scale monitoring needs by targeting the most basic of population

[1]  George M. Furnival,et al.  History of forest survey sampling designs in the United States , 2000 .

[2]  D. Wilcove,et al.  Getting Ahead of the Extinction Curve. , 1993, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[3]  G. Niemi,et al.  A critical analysis on the use of indicator species in management , 1997 .

[4]  M. O. Hill,et al.  TWINSPAN: a FORTRAN program of arranging multivariate data in an ordered two way table by classification of individual and attributes , 1979 .

[5]  James D. Nichols,et al.  Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Mammals , 1996 .

[6]  W. Heyer,et al.  Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians. , 1995 .

[7]  Colin Ryall,et al.  Principles of conservation biology , 1998 .

[8]  B. Everitt,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[9]  B. Efron,et al.  The Jackknife: The Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans. , 1983 .

[10]  M. Bowers Species as indicators of large-scale environmental change: A computer simulation model of population decline , 1996 .

[11]  Dennis D. Murphy,et al.  Developing an Analytical Context for Multispecies Conservation Planning , 1997 .

[12]  William J. Zielinski,et al.  Using Presence‐Absence Data to Build and Test Spatial Habitat Models for the Fisher in the Klamath Region, U.S.A. , 1999 .

[13]  W. A. Thomas Indicators of Environmental Quality , 1971, Science.

[14]  G. Nachman,et al.  A MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF THE FUNCTIONAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DENSITY AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF A POPULATION , 1981 .

[15]  J. Berger,et al.  Population Constraints Associated with the Use of Black Rhinos as an Umbrella Species for Desert Herbivores , 1997 .

[16]  T. Caro,et al.  On the Use of Surrogate Species in Conservation Biology , 1999 .

[17]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  The Focal‐Species Approach and Landscape Restoration: a Critique , 2002 .

[18]  N. Gotelli Predicting Species Occurrences: Issues of Accuracy and Scale , 2003 .

[19]  Autocorrelated Rates of Change in Animal Populations and their Relationship to Precipitation , 1998 .

[20]  Gary K. Meffe,et al.  Principles of Conservation Biology , 1995 .

[21]  J. Terborgh,et al.  Continental Conservation: scientific foundations of regional reserve networks , 2000 .

[22]  Dennis D. Murphy,et al.  A NEW METHOD FOR SELECTION OF UMBRELLA SPECIES FOR CONSERVATION PLANNING , 2000 .

[23]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Choosing Ecological Indicators: Effects of Taxonomic Aggregation on Sensitivity to Stress and Natural Variability , 1992 .

[24]  Taylor H. Ricketts,et al.  Terrestrial ecoregions of North America : a conservation assessment , 1999 .

[25]  James H. Brown,et al.  The Report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem Management , 1996 .

[26]  C. S. Robbins,et al.  Monitoring bird populations with Breeding Bird Survey and atlas data , 1989 .

[27]  J. Franklin Preserving Biodiversity: Species, Ecosystems, or Landscapes? , 1993, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[28]  Virginia H. Dale,et al.  Sustaining the people’s lands:recommendations for stewardship of the national forests and grasslands into the next century , 1999 .

[29]  G. Polis,et al.  Food webs: integration of patterns and dynamics , 1997 .

[30]  J. Terborgh Preservation of Natural Diversity: The Problem of Extinction Prone Species , 1974 .

[31]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  BIODIVERSITY ASSESSMENT USING STRUCTURED INVENTORY: CAPTURING THE ANT FAUNA OF A TROPICAL RAIN FOREST , 1997 .

[32]  John R. Sauer,et al.  Monitoring Bird Populations by Point Counts , 1997 .

[33]  L. Kline Calcitonin-induced body mass loss in the lizard Sauromalus obesus , 1985 .

[34]  R. G. Wright,et al.  GAP ANALYSIS: A GEOGRAPHIC APPROACH TO PROTECTION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY , 1993 .

[35]  K. M. L. Suxena,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Theory , 1976 .

[36]  J. Sauer,et al.  Survey designs and statistical methods for the estimation of avian population trends , 1990 .

[37]  J. W. Thomas,et al.  Ecological Uses of Vertebrate Indicator Species: A Critique , 1988 .

[38]  Identification and Use of Plant Species as Ecological Indicators of Air Pollution Stress in National Park Units , 1992 .

[39]  D. Western Africa's elephants and rhinos: Flagships in crisis. , 1987, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[40]  Peter Rothery,et al.  A general method for measuring relative change in range size from biological atlas data , 2002 .

[41]  M. Ruggiero,et al.  Status of biotic inventories in US national parks , 1995 .

[42]  H. Synge,et al.  The biological aspects of rare plant conservation , 2004, Vegetatio.

[43]  D. Holland The Western Pond Turtle; Habitat and History, 1993-1994 Final Report. , 1994 .

[44]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[45]  Karl Aubry,et al.  Occurrence and activity of American martens Martens americana in relation to roads and other routes , 2000 .

[46]  P. Licht Effects of Temperature on Heart Rates of Lizards during Rest and Activity , 1965, Physiological Zoology.

[47]  J. Bart,et al.  Use of Presence-Absence to Measure Changes in Avian Density , 1989 .

[48]  R. Lambeck,et al.  Focal Species: a Multi-species Umbrella for Nature Conservation Focal Species for Nature Conservation Lambeck , 2022 .

[49]  R. Parmenter Digestive turnover rates in freshwater turtles: The influence of temperature and body size , 1981 .

[50]  Timothy P. Duane Recreation in the Sierra , 1996 .

[51]  William Feller,et al.  An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications , 1951 .

[52]  M. Feder,et al.  Relationships among Cutaneous Surface Area, Cutaneous Mass, and Body Mass in Frogs: A Reappraisal , 1992, Physiological Zoology.

[53]  Glen E. Woolfenden,et al.  Life and Death in the Fast Lane: Demographic Consequences of Road Mortality in the Florida Scrub‐Jay , 2000 .

[54]  G. Banco,et al.  Principal Component and Correspondence Analyses with Respect to Instrumental Variables : An Overview of Their Role in Studies of Structure - Activity and Species - Environment Relationships , 1991 .

[55]  J. Verner,et al.  The guild concept applied to management of bird populations , 1984 .

[56]  J. Terborgh,et al.  The role of top carnivores in regulating terrestrial ecosystems , 1999 .

[57]  Pacific Southwest Forest,et al.  Wildlife 2000: Modeling Habitat Relationships of Terrestrial Vertebrates , 1987 .

[58]  William J. Zielinski,et al.  Monitoring Ecosystems in the Sierra Nevada: The Conceptual Model Foundation , 2000 .

[59]  D. Simberloff Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: Is single-species management passé in the landscape era? , 1998 .

[60]  Byron J. T. Morgan,et al.  Estimating Numbers of Terrestrial Birds. , 1981 .

[61]  D. Crews,et al.  Body mass and reproduction in female red-sided garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis) , 1990 .

[62]  R. Noss Indicators for Monitoring Biodiversity: A Hierarchical Approach , 1990 .

[63]  A S Whittemore,et al.  Poisson regression with misclassified counts: application to cervical cancer. , 1991, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics.

[64]  George W. Cox,et al.  Alien species in North America and Hawaii : impacts on natural ecosystems , 2000 .

[65]  J. Devillers,et al.  Applied multivariate analysis in SAR and environmental studies , 1991 .

[66]  Sierra Nevada Ecosystem,et al.  Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project final report to Congress , 1997 .

[67]  John Harte,et al.  The Birder's Handbook: A Field Guide to the Natural History of North American Birds , 1989 .

[68]  Gary C. White,et al.  Monitoring Vertebrate Populations , 1998 .

[69]  William J. Zielinski,et al.  American marten, fisher, lynx, and wolverine : survey methods for their detection / [technical editors], William J. Zielinski, Thomas E. Kucera. , 1998 .

[70]  J. Castilla,et al.  Challenges in the Quest for Keystones , 1996 .

[71]  Ian Oliver,et al.  Designing a Cost‐Effective Invertebrate Survey: A Test of Methods for Rapid Assessment of Biodiversity , 1996 .

[72]  D. Bystrak,et al.  The north american breeding bird survey. , 1981 .

[73]  H. Mooney,et al.  Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function , 1994, Praktische Zahnmedizin Odonto-Stomatologie Pratique Practical Dental Medicine.

[74]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  The Multifaceted Aspects of Ecosystem Integrity , 1997 .

[75]  John E. Estes,et al.  Species RichnessA geographic approach to protecting future biological diversity , 1987 .

[76]  J. Copas Binary Regression Models for Contaminated Data , 1988 .

[77]  Michael L. Morrison,et al.  Wildlife-habitat relationships : concepts and applications , 1993 .

[78]  M. Soulé,et al.  The Onslaught of Alien Species, and Other Challenges in the Coming Decades * , 1990 .

[79]  G. Kattan Rarity and Vulnerability: The Birds of the Cordillera Central of Colombia , 1992 .

[80]  M. O. Hill,et al.  A Fortran program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification of the individuals and attributes , 1979 .

[81]  J. Mosher,et al.  Methods of detecting and counting raptors: A review , 1981 .

[82]  A. Bennett,et al.  Species-specific predictions of the impact of habitat fragmentation: Local extinction of birds in the box-ironbark forests of central Victoria, Australia , 1997 .

[83]  Paul C. Paquet,et al.  Conservation Biology and Carnivore Conservation in the Rocky Mountains , 1996 .

[84]  George M. Furnival,et al.  Forest Survey Sampling Designs: A History , 1999, Journal of Forestry.

[85]  K. Nagy,et al.  Food Intake Rate and Body Mass Influence Transit Time and Digestibility in the Desert Tortoise (Xerobates agassizii) , 1993, Physiological Zoology.

[86]  B. Efron The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans , 1987 .

[87]  Francis A. Roesch,et al.  Analytical alternatives for an annual inventory system , 1999 .

[88]  M. R. Fuller,et al.  Estimation of the proportion of an area occupied by an animal species , 1986 .

[89]  P. Legendre,et al.  SPECIES ASSEMBLAGES AND INDICATOR SPECIES:THE NEED FOR A FLEXIBLE ASYMMETRICAL APPROACH , 1997 .

[90]  Linda A. Weir,et al.  North American Amphibian Monitoring Program (NAAMP) , 2005 .

[91]  R. Lewke NECK-BITING AND OTHER ASPECTS OF REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY OF THE YUMA KINGSNAKE (LAMPROPELTIS GETULUS) , 1979 .

[92]  S. Syrjala,et al.  A statistical test for a difference between the spatial distributions of two populations , 1996 .

[93]  G. Fellers,et al.  A Standardized Protocol for Surveying Aquatic Amphibians , 1995 .

[94]  H. Toutenburg Fleiss, J. L.: Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. John Wiley & Sons, New York‐London‐Sydney‐Toronto 1973. XIII, 233 S. , 1974 .

[95]  J. Lawton,et al.  Organisms as ecosystem engineers , 1994 .