Lean Management Model for Construction of High-Rise Apartment Buildings

Execution of the finishing works in high-rise apartment buildings is made complex by the need to customize apartments to the varying requirements and designs of individual clients. The conventional construction planning practice of progressing upward from floor to floor breaks down in the face of the arbitrary sequence in which clients finalize their decisions. The results are long cycle times for delivery of completed apartments and corollary high levels of work in progress, budget and schedule overruns, and general dissatisfaction with the process on the part of the developer, contractor, subcontractors, and the clients. Application of lean construction principles to this problem has led to development of a management model that adopts pull scheduling, reduced batch sizes, and a degree of multiskilling. The main benefits expected are an enhanced ability to provide customized apartments, improved cash flow, and reduced apartment delivery cycle times. The model was first formulated in theory, then tested using a management simulation game and computer simulation, and subsequently, developed for practical application. This paper presents an analysis of conventional practice, the theoretical background to the lean approach, and the specific management changes proposed.

[1]  N. Kartam,et al.  Delays and cost increases in the construction of private residential projects in Kuwait , 2005 .

[2]  Khaled El-Rayes,et al.  Change Orders Impact on Labor Productivity , 2005 .

[3]  David Gann,et al.  Construction as a manufacturing process? Similarities and differences between industrialized housing and car production in Japan , 1996 .

[4]  M. Naim,et al.  An innovative supply chain strategy for customized housing , 2003 .

[5]  大野 耐一,et al.  Toyota production system : beyond large-scale production , 1988 .

[6]  Iris D. Tommelein,et al.  Improving Labor Flow Reliability for Better Productivity as Lean Construction Principle , 2003 .

[7]  Russell Kenley,et al.  Aa Lean Approach to Construction: an Historical Case Study , 1997 .

[8]  Rafael Sacks,et al.  LEAPCON: Simulation of Lean Construction of High-Rise Apartment Buildings , 2007 .

[9]  Shlomo Peer.  Network Analysis and Construction Planning , 1974 .

[10]  Glenn Ballard,et al.  Cycle Time Reduction in Home Building , 2001 .

[11]  Glenn Ballard,et al.  Learning to see work flow: an application of lean concepts to precast concrete fabrication , 2003 .

[12]  James P. Womack,et al.  Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation , 1996 .

[13]  Olli Seppänen,et al.  A Case Study of Line-of-Balance based Schedule Planning and Control System , 2005 .

[14]  Jens Ove Riis,et al.  Lean Project Management , 1993 .

[15]  Masanobu Sakamoto,et al.  A STUDY OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEENBUFFERS AND PERFORMANCE IN CONSTRUCTION , 2002 .

[16]  Photios G. Ioannou,et al.  General-purpose systems for effective construction simulation , 1999 .

[17]  P.-E Josephson,et al.  The causes and costs of defects in construction. A study of seven building projects , 1999 .

[18]  Jeffrey S. Russell,et al.  Impact of change orders on labor efficiency for electrical construction , 1999 .

[19]  R. Sacks,et al.  An economic game theory model of subcontractor resource allocation behaviour , 2006 .

[20]  Ivica Završki,et al.  Reducing Variability to Improve Performance as a Lean Construction Principle , 2002 .

[21]  Norman Bodek,et al.  Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production , 1988 .

[22]  Rafael Sacks,et al.  Towards a Lean Understanding of Resource Allocation in a Multi-Project Sub-Contracting Environment , 2004 .

[23]  Anil Sawhney,et al.  Implications of Even Flow Production Methodology for U.S. Housing Industry , 2003 .