Barbarians Inside the Gates: Partisan New Media and the Polarization of American Political Discourse

Scholars of political communication have long examined newsworthiness by focusing on the news choices of media organizations (Lewin, 1947; White, 1950; Sigal, 1973; Gans, 1979). However, in recent years these traditional arbiters of the news have increasingly been joined or even supplanted in affecting the public agenda by “new media” competitors, including cable news, talk radio, and even amateur bloggers. The standards by which this new class of decision makers evaluates news are at best only partially explained by prior studies focused on professional journalists and organizations. In this study, we seek to correct this oversight by content analyzing five online news sources—including wire services, cable news, and political blog sites—in order to compare their news judgments in the months prior to, and immediately following, the 2006 midterm election. We collected all stories from Reuters' and AP's “top political news” sections. We then investigated whether a given story was also chosen to appear on each wire's top news page (indicating greater perceived newsworthiness than those that were not chosen) and compared the wires' editorial choices to those of more partisan blogs (from the left: DailyKos.com; from the right: FreeRepublic.com) and cable outlets (FoxNews.com). We find evidence of greater partisan filtering for the latter three Web sources, and relatively greater reliance on traditional newsworthiness criteria for the news wires.

[1]  M. Baum,et al.  Crossing the Water's Edge: Elite Rhetoric, Media Coverage and the Rally-Round-the-Flag Phenomenon, 1979-2003 , 2007 .

[2]  Richard Herrera.  The Talk of the Party: Political Labels, Symbolic Capital, and American Life , 2006, Perspectives on Politics.

[3]  Glenn H. Reynolds,et al.  An Army of Davids: How Markets and Technology Empower Ordinary People to Beat Big Media, Big Government, and Other Goliaths , 2006 .

[4]  Jerome Armstrong,et al.  Crashing the Gate: Netroots, Grassroots, and the Rise of People-Powered Politics , 2006 .

[5]  Tim Groseclose,et al.  A Measure of Media Bias , 2005 .

[6]  David Tewksbury.  The Seeds of Audience Fragmentation: Specialization in the Use of Online News Sites , 2005 .

[7]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog , 2005, LinkKDD '05.

[8]  Sharon E. Jarvis.  The Talk of the Party: Political Labels, Symbolic Capital, and American Life , 2005 .

[9]  John Mcmanus.  All the News That's Fit to Sell: How the Market Transforms Information into News/Audience Economics: Media Institutions and the Audience Marketplace/Toward a Political Economy of Culture: Capitalism and Communication in the Twenty-First Century , 2005 .

[10]  Lee Wilkins.  Deciding What's News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time , 2005 .

[11]  C. Allen.  Foreign news coverage in selected U.S. newspapers 1927-1997: a content analysis , 2005 .

[12]  Maxwell McCombs,et al.  Agenda-Setting Research: Issues, Attributes, and Influences , 2004 .

[13]  D. Murphey,et al.  Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism , 2004 .

[14]  A. Anttiroiko.  Introduction to democratic e-governance , 2004 .

[15]  Al Franken,et al.  Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right , 2004 .

[16]  J. Hamilton.  All the News That's Fit to Sell: How the Market Transforms Information into News , 2003 .

[17]  A. Chadwick.  Bringing E-Democracy Back In , 2003 .

[18]  Michael Ryan,et al.  What Liberal Media? the Truth about Bias and the News , 2003 .

[19]  James S. Fishkin,et al.  Debating Deliberative Democracy , 2003 .

[20]  E. Alterman,et al.  What Liberal Media?: The Truth about Bias and the News , 2003 .

[21]  David Niven.  Tilt?: The Search for Media Bias , 2002 .

[22]  SCOTT L. ALTHAUS,et al.  Agenda Setting and the “New” News , 2002, Commun. Res..

[23]  Bias: A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News , 2001 .

[24]  C. Sunstein.  Republic.com , 2001 .

[25]  Daniel Sutter,et al.  CAN THE MEDIA BE SO LIBERAL ?T HE ECONOMICS OF MEDIA BIAS , 2001 .

[26]  Jason Wittenberg,et al.  Making the Most Of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation , 2000 .

[27]  Roderick P. Hart.  Campaign Talk: Why Elections Are Good for Us , 2000 .

[28]  J. Blumler,et al.  The Third Age of Political Communication: Influences and Features , 1999 .

[29]  S. Kernell,et al.  Is Network News Coverage of the President Biased? , 1998, The Journal of Politics.

[30]  Andrea Dworkin,et al.  Life and death , 1854 .

[31]  E. Katz.  And Deliver Us from Segmentation , 1996 .

[32]  T. E. Patterson.  Out Of Order , 1993 .

[33]  Michael Pfau.  The Mass Media and American Politics , 1989 .

[34]  Seymour Sudman,et al.  THE PEOPLE AND THE PRESS , 1987 .

[35]  Lynda Lee Kaid,et al.  Handbook of Political Communication Research , 1985 .

[36]  D. Graber,et al.  Mass media and American politics , 1980 .

[37]  Michael J. Robinson,et al.  Network News Coverage of Congress , 1979 .

[38]  M. Schudson.  Discovering The News: A Social History Of American Newspapers , 1980 .

[39]  Gaye Tuchman.  Making News: A Study in the Construction of Reality , 1978 .

[40]  R. Mcclure.  Bias in the News: Network Television News Coverage of the 1972 Election Campaign . By C. Richard Hofstetter. (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1976. Pp. xv + 213. $13.75.) , 1978 .

[41]  C. Hofstetter.  Bias in the news: Network television coverage of the 1972 election campaign , 1976 .

[42]  David R. Mayhew.  Congress: The Electoral Connection , 1975 .

[43]  Leon V. Sigal,et al.  Reporters and Officials: The Organization and Politics of Newsmaking , 1973 .

[44]  D. Shaw,et al.  Agenda setting function of mass media , 1972 .

[45]  E. Efron,et al.  The news twisters , 1971 .

[46]  Paul B. Snider.  “Mr. Gates” Revisited: A 1966 Version of the 1949 Case Study , 1967 .

[47]  D. White.  The “Gate Keeper”: A Case Study in the Selection of News , 1950 .

[48]  K. Lewin.  Frontiers in Group Dynamics , 1947 .