The Seven Deadly Sins of Measuring Brain Structural Connectivity Using Diffusion MRI Streamlines Fibre-Tracking

There is great interest in the study of brain structural connectivity, as white matter abnormalities have been implicated in many disease states. Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides a powerful means to characterise structural connectivity non-invasively, by using a fibre-tracking algorithm. The most widely used fibre-tracking strategy is based on the step-wise generation of streamlines. Despite their popularity and widespread use, there are a number of practical considerations that must be taken into account in order to increase the robustness of streamlines tracking results, particularly when these methods are used to study brain structural connectivity, and the connectome. This review article describes what we consider the ‘seven deadly sins’ of mapping structural connections using diffusion MRI streamlines fibre-tracking, with particular emphasis on ‘sins’ that can be practically avoided and they can have an important impact in the results. It is shown that there are important ‘deadly sins’ to be avoided at every step of the pipeline, such as during data acquisition, during data modelling to estimate local fibre architecture, during the fibre-tracking process itself, and during quantification of the tracking results. The recommendations here are intended to inform users on potential important shortcomings of their current tracking protocols, as well as to guide future users on some of the key issues and decisions that must be faced when designing their processing pipelines.

[1]  P. Basser,et al.  MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[2]  P. Basser.  Inferring microstructural features and the physiological state of tissues from diffusion‐weighted images , 1995, NMR in biomedicine.

[3]  S. Warach,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Acute Stroke , 1998, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[4]  S C Williams,et al.  Non‐invasive assessment of axonal fiber connectivity in the human brain via diffusion tensor MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  P. V. van Zijl,et al.  Three‐dimensional tracking of axonal projections in the brain by magnetic resonance imaging , 1999, Annals of neurology.

[6]  M. Raichle,et al.  Tracking neuronal fiber pathways in the living human brain. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  P. Basser,et al.  In vivo fiber tractography using DT‐MRI data , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  N. Makris,et al.  High angular resolution diffusion imaging reveals intravoxel white matter fiber heterogeneity , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  Daniel C. Alexander,et al.  Persistent Angular Structure: New Insights from Diffusion MRI Data. Dummy Version , 2003, IPMI.

[10]  Stefan Skare,et al.  How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imaging , 2003, NeuroImage.

[11]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion‐weighted MR imaging , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  Geoffrey J M Parker,et al.  A framework for a streamline‐based probabilistic index of connectivity (PICo) using a structural interpretation of MRI diffusion measurements , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  Alan Connelly,et al.  Direct estimation of the fiber orientation density function from diffusion-weighted MRI data using spherical deconvolution , 2004, NeuroImage.

[14]  D. Tuch.  Q‐ball imaging , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  Andrew L. Alexander,et al.  Bootstrap white matter tractography (BOOT-TRAC) , 2005, NeuroImage.

[16]  P. Hagmann,et al.  Mapping complex tissue architecture with diffusion spectrum magnetic resonance imaging , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  Alan Connelly,et al.  Robust determination of the fibre orientation distribution in diffusion MRI: Non-negativity constrained super-resolved spherical deconvolution , 2007, NeuroImage.

[18]  C. Nimsky,et al.  Implementation of Fiber Tract Navigation , 2006, Neurosurgery.

[19]  Li-Wei Kuo,et al.  Optimization of diffusion spectrum imaging and q-ball imaging on clinical MRI system , 2008, NeuroImage.

[20]  Derek K. Jones.  Tractography Gone Wild: Probabilistic Fibre Tracking Using the Wild Bootstrap With Diffusion Tensor MRI , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  Roland G. Henry,et al.  Probabilistic streamline q-ball tractography using the residual bootstrap , 2008, NeuroImage.

[22]  V. Kiselev,et al.  Gibbs tracking: A novel approach for the reconstruction of neuronal pathways , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  O. Sporns,et al.  Mapping the Structural Core of Human Cerebral Cortex , 2008, PLoS biology.

[24]  Rachid Deriche,et al.  Deterministic and Probabilistic Tractography Based on Complex Fibre Orientation Distributions , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  Daniel C. Alexander,et al.  MicroTrack: An Algorithm for Concurrent Projectome and Microstructure Estimation , 2010, MICCAI.

[26]  Mara Cercignani,et al.  Twenty‐five pitfalls in the analysis of diffusion MRI data , 2010, NMR in biomedicine.

[27]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  A Hough transform global probabilistic approach to multiple-subject diffusion MRI tractography , 2011, Medical Image Anal..

[28]  Jacques-Donald Tournier,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging and beyond , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  D. Long.  Networks of the Brain , 2011 .

[30]  Jan Sijbers,et al.  Probabilistic fiber tracking using the residual bootstrap with constrained spherical deconvolution , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[31]  Alan Connelly,et al.  Anatomically-constrained tractography: Improved diffusion MRI streamlines tractography through effective use of anatomical information , 2012, NeuroImage.

[32]  Carlo Pierpaoli,et al.  Effects of image distortions originating from susceptibility variations and concomitant fields on diffusion MRI tractography results , 2012, NeuroImage.

[33]  Simon K. Warfield,et al.  Parametric Representation of Multiple White Matter Fascicles from Cube and Sphere Diffusion MRI , 2012, PloS one.

[34]  Alan Connelly,et al.  MRtrix: Diffusion tractography in crossing fiber regions , 2012, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[35]  Stuart Crozier,et al.  Apparent Fibre Density: A novel measure for the analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images , 2012, NeuroImage.

[36]  Thomas R. Knösche,et al.  White matter integrity, fiber count, and other fallacies: The do's and don'ts of diffusion MRI , 2013, NeuroImage.

[37]  M. Berger,et al.  Quantifying diffusion MRI tractography of the corticospinal tract in brain tumors with deterministic and probabilistic methods☆ , 2013, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[38]  A. Connelly,et al.  White matter fiber tractography: why we need to move beyond DTI. , 2013, Journal of neurosurgery.

[39]  Alan Connelly,et al.  SIFT: Spherical-deconvolution informed filtering of tractograms , 2013, NeuroImage.

[40]  A. Connelly,et al.  Determination of the appropriate b value and number of gradient directions for high‐angular‐resolution diffusion‐weighted imaging , 2013, NMR in biomedicine.

[41]  Derek K. Jones,et al.  Investigating the prevalence of complex fiber configurations in white matter tissue with diffusion magnetic resonance imaging , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[42]  F. Pestilli,et al.  Evaluation and statistical inference for living connectomes , 2014, Nature Methods.

[43]  Jean-Philippe Thiran,et al.  Global Tractography with Embedded Anatomical Priors for Quantitative Connectivity Analysis , 2014, Front. Neurol..

[44]  J. Fernandez-Miranda,et al.  Advanced diffusion MRI fiber tracking in neurosurgical and neurodegenerative disorders and neuroanatomical studies: A review. , 2014, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[45]  Jan Sijbers,et al.  Multi-tissue constrained spherical deconvolution for improved analysis of multi-shell diffusion MRI data , 2014, NeuroImage.

[46]  M. Berger,et al.  Quantifying accuracy and precision of diffusion MR tractography of the corticospinal tract in brain tumors. , 2014, Journal of neurosurgery.

[47]  Rachid Deriche,et al.  Towards quantitative connectivity analysis: reducing tractography biases , 2014, NeuroImage.

[48]  Alan Connelly,et al.  The effects of SIFT on the reproducibility and biological accuracy of the structural connectome , 2015, NeuroImage.

[49]  Alan Connelly,et al.  Quantification of voxel-wise total fibre density: Investigating the problems associated with track-count mapping , 2015, NeuroImage.

[50]  Alan Connelly,et al.  SIFT2: Enabling dense quantitative assessment of brain white matter connectivity using streamlines tractography , 2015, NeuroImage.

[51]  Jean-Philippe Thiran,et al.  COMMIT: Convex Optimization Modeling for Microstructure Informed Tractography , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[52]  Leonardo L. Gollo,et al.  Connectome sensitivity or specificity: which is more important? , 2016, NeuroImage.

[53]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Fundamentals of Brain Network Analysis , 2016 .

[54]  Alessandro Daducci,et al.  Microstructure Informed Tractography: Pitfalls and Open Challenges , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[55]  Chun-Hung Yeh,et al.  Correction for diffusion MRI fibre tracking biases: The consequences for structural connectomic metrics , 2016, NeuroImage.

[56]  Stamatios N. Sotiropoulos,et al.  An integrated approach to correction for off-resonance effects and subject movement in diffusion MR imaging , 2016, NeuroImage.

[57]  Rachid Deriche,et al.  AxTract: Toward microstructure informed tractography , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[58]  Fernando Calamante,et al.  Track-weighted imaging methods: extracting information from a streamlines tractogram , 2017, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[59]  Peter F. Neher,et al.  The challenge of mapping the human connectome based on diffusion tractography , 2017, Nature Communications.

[60]  Maxime Descoteaux,et al.  Surface-enhanced tractography (SET) , 2017, NeuroImage.

[61]  Chun-Hung Yeh,et al.  Connectomes from streamlines tractography: Assigning streamlines to brain parcellations is not trivial but highly consequential , 2019, NeuroImage.

[62]  Flavio Dell'Acqua,et al.  Modelling white matter with spherical deconvolution: How and why? , 2018, NMR in biomedicine.

[63]  Chun-Hung Yeh,et al.  Is removal of weak connections necessary for graph-theoretical analysis of dense weighted structural connectomes from diffusion MRI? , 2019, NeuroImage.

[64]  Andrew Zalesky,et al.  Building connectomes using diffusion MRI: why, how and but , 2017, NMR in biomedicine.

[65]  Jean-Philippe Thiran,et al.  Tractography reproducibility challenge with empirical data (TraCED): The 2017 ISMRM diffusion study group challenge , 2019, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[66]  Bennett A Landman,et al.  Challenges in diffusion MRI tractography - Lessons learned from international benchmark competitions. , 2019, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[67]  Ben Jeurissen,et al.  Diffusion MRI fiber tractography of the brain , 2019, NMR in biomedicine.

[68]  Kotagiri Ramamohanarao,et al.  Mapping connectomes with diffusion MRI: deterministic or probabilistic tractography? , 2018, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[69]  C. Sexton,et al.  Diffusion MRI , 2020, The Wiley Encyclopedia of Health Psychology.