Cross-decoding reveals shared brain activity patterns between saccadic eye-movements and semantic processing of implicitly spatial words

Processing words with referents that are typically observed up or down in space (up/down words) influences the subsequent identification of visual targets in congruent locations. Eye-tracking studies have shown that up/down word comprehension shortens launch times of subsequent saccades to congruent locations and modulates concurrent saccade trajectories. This can be explained by a task-dependent interaction of semantic processing and oculomotor programs or by a direct recruitment of direction-specific processes in oculomotor and spatial systems as part of semantic processing. To test the latter possibility, we conducted a functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment and used multi-voxel pattern analysis to assess 1) whether the typical location of word referents can be decoded from the fronto-parietal spatial network and 2) whether activity patterns are shared between up/down words and up/down saccadic eye movements. In line with these hypotheses, significant decoding of up vs. down words and cross-decoding between up/down saccades and up/down words were observed in the frontal eye field region in the superior frontal sulcus and the inferior parietal lobule. Beyond these spatial attention areas, typical location of word referents could be decoded from a set of occipital, temporal, and frontal areas, indicating that interactions between high-level regions typically implicated with lexical-semantic processing and spatial/oculomotor regions constitute the neural basis for access to spatial aspects of word meanings.

[1]  Falk Huettig,et al.  Saccade Trajectories Reveal Dynamic Interactions of Semantic and Spatial Information During the Processing of Implicitly Spatial Words , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  T. Rogers,et al.  The neural and computational bases of semantic cognition , 2016, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  Nikola Vukovic,et al.  Primary motor cortex functionally contributes to language comprehension: An online rTMS study , 2017, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  M. Corbetta,et al.  A Common Network of Functional Areas for Attention and Eye Movements , 1998, Neuron.

[5]  Tom Michael Mitchell,et al.  Predicting Human Brain Activity Associated with the Meanings of Nouns , 2008, Science.

[6]  Rutvik H. Desai,et al.  The neurobiology of semantic memory , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  M. Posner,et al.  The attention system of the human brain: 20 years after. , 2012, Annual review of neuroscience.

[8]  Gabriella Vigliocco,et al.  Effects of motion speed in action representations , 2017, Brain and Language.

[9]  J. Pratt,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: General The Cost and Benefit of Implicit Spatial Cues for Visual Attention , 2012 .

[10]  Yi Chen,et al.  Statistical inference and multiple testing correction in classification-based multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA): Random permutations and cluster size control , 2011, NeuroImage.

[11]  D. Tranel,et al.  A Double Dissociation Between the Meanings of Action Verbs and Locative Prepositions , 2003, Neurocase.

[12]  F. Binkofski,et al.  The challenge of abstract concepts. , 2017, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  William W. Graves,et al.  Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  Supplementary Information for Natural Speech Reveals the Semantic Maps That Tile Human Cerebral Cortex , 2022 .

[15]  V. Michel,et al.  Recruitment of an Area Involved in Eye Movements During Mental Arithmetic , 2009, Science.

[16]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Evolution of human cortical circuits for reading and arithmetic : The “ neuronal recycling ” hypothesis , 2004 .

[17]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  SUBTLEX-NL: A new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[18]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Cultural Recycling of Cortical Maps , 2007, Neuron.

[19]  C. Neil Macrae,et al.  Puddles, Parties, and Professors: Linking Word Categorization to Neural Patterns of Visuospatial Coding , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  T. Paus Location and function of the human frontal eye-field: A selective review , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  Tirin Moore,et al.  Attention Governs Action in the Primate Frontal Eye Field , 2007, Neuron.

[22]  Takashi R Sato,et al.  Neuronal Basis of Covert Spatial Attention in the Frontal Eye Field , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  D. Tranel,et al.  Neuroanatomical correlates of locative prepositions , 2004, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[24]  W. K. Simmons,et al.  A common neural substrate for perceiving and knowing about color , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[26]  Falk Huettig,et al.  Spoken Words Can Make the Invisible Visible—Testing the Involvement of Low-Level Visual Representations in Spoken Word Processing , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  T. Schenkenberg,et al.  Line bisection and unilateral visual neglect in patients with neurologic impairment , 1980, Neurology.

[28]  Stefan Pollmann,et al.  PyMVPA: a Python Toolbox for Multivariate Pattern Analysis of fMRI Data , 2009, Neuroinformatics.

[29]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Head Up, Foot Down , 2008, Psychological science.

[30]  K. Priftis,et al.  Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line , 2002, Nature.

[31]  Jin Fan,et al.  The activation of attentional networks , 2005, NeuroImage.

[32]  Barbara Kaup,et al.  From top to bottom: spatial shifts of attention caused by linguistic stimuli , 2012, Cognitive Processing.

[33]  Michaël A. Stevens,et al.  Norms of age of acquisition and concreteness for 30,000 Dutch words. , 2014, Acta psychologica.

[34]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Heteromodal Cortical Areas Encode Sensory-Motor Features of Word Meaning , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  Barbara Kaup,et al.  Reading “Sun” and Looking Up: The Influence of Language on Saccadic Eye Movements in the Vertical Dimension , 2013, PloS one.

[36]  G. Vigliocco,et al.  Reading Sky and Seeing a Cloud: On the Relevance of Events for Perceptual Simulation , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  Giancarlo Valente,et al.  Brain-Based Translation: fMRI Decoding of Spoken Words in Bilinguals Reveals Language-Independent Semantic Representations in Anterior Temporal Lobe , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  J. Adelman,et al.  Words, objects, and locations: Perceptual matching explains spatial interference and facilitation , 2015 .

[39]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Perceptions of perceptual symbols , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[40]  Christine D. Wilson,et al.  Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[41]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Concept Representation Reflects Multimodal Abstraction: A Framework for Embodied Semantics. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[43]  Falk Huettig,et al.  A Task-Dependent Causal Role for Low-Level Visual Processes in Spoken Word Comprehension , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[44]  Bonnie E. Shook-Sa,et al.  . CC-BY-NC-ND 4 . 0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author / funder , who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity , 2021 .

[45]  I. Johnsrude,et al.  Somatotopic Representation of Action Words in Human Motor and Premotor Cortex , 2004, Neuron.

[46]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Predicting brain activation patterns associated with individual lexical concepts based on five sensory-motor attributes , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[47]  Romain Quentin,et al.  Frontal eye field, where art thou? Anatomy, function, and non-invasive manipulation of frontal regions involved in eye movements and associated cognitive operations , 2014, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[48]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Information-based functional brain mapping. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  T. Paus,et al.  Cortical regions involved in eye movements, shifts of attention, and gaze perception , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[50]  S. Thompson-Schill,et al.  Creating Concepts from Converging Features in Human Cortex. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[51]  David Poeppel,et al.  The role of visual representations during the lexical access of spoken words , 2014, Brain and Language.