Bacterial display enables efficient and quantitative peptide affinity maturation.

A quantitative screening method was developed to enable isolation and affinity maturation of peptide ligands specific for a given target from peptide libraries displayed on the outer surface of Escherichia coli using multi-parameter flow cytometry. From a large, random 15-mer peptide library, screening identified a core motif of W-E/D-W-E/D that conferred binding to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). One cycle of affinity maturation resulted in the identification of several families of VEGF-binding peptides having distinct consensus sequences, from which a preferred disulfide constraint emerged. In the second affinity maturation cycle, high affinity peptides were favored by the addition of a decoy protein that bound an adjacent epitope on the display scaffold. The decoy apparently reduced rebinding or avidity effects, and the resulting peptides exhibited consensus at 12 of 19 amino acid positions. Peptides identified and affinity matured using bacterial display were remarkably similar to the best affinity matured using phage display and exhibited comparable dissociation constants (within 2-fold; K(D) = 4.7 x 10(-7) M). Screening of bacterial-displayed peptide libraries using cytometry enabled optimization of screening conditions to favor affinity and specificity and rapid clonal characterization. Bacterial display thus provides a new quantitative tool for the discovery and evolutionary optimization of protein-specific peptide ligands.

[1]  Hiroshi Yanagawa,et al.  DNA display for in vitro selection of diverse peptide libraries. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[2]  R. Stevens,et al.  Molecular evolution of antibody cross-reactivity for two subtypes of type A botulinum neurotoxin , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[3]  H. Wernérus,et al.  Evaluation of Staphylococcal Cell Surface Display and Flow Cytometry for Postselectional Characterization of Affinity Proteins in Combinatorial Protein Engineering Applications , 2007, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[4]  V. Roschke,et al.  Discovery of high‐affinity peptide binders to BLyS by phage display , 2005, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[5]  A. Pini,et al.  Bioactive peptides from libraries. , 2005, Chemistry & biology.

[6]  Paul H. Bessette,et al.  Rapid isolation of high-affinity protein binding peptides using bacterial display. , 2004, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[7]  A G Cochran,et al.  Novel peptides selected to bind vascular endothelial growth factor target the receptor-binding site. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[8]  M. Uhlén,et al.  Epitope mapping of antibodies using bacterial surface display , 2008, Nature Methods.

[9]  Paul H. Bessette,et al.  Bacterial display using circularly permuted outer membrane protein OmpX yields high affinity peptide ligands , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[10]  S. Cohen,et al.  Analysis of gene control signals by DNA fusion and cloning in Escherichia coli. , 1980, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  Patrick S Daugherty,et al.  Intracellular protein interaction mapping with FRET hybrids , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  M. Schembri,et al.  Fimbrial surface display systems in bacteria: from vaccines to random libraries. , 2000, Microbiology.

[14]  Fine affinity discrimination by normalized fluorescence activated cell sorting in staphylococcal surface display. , 2005, FEMS microbiology letters.

[15]  D. Belin,et al.  Tight regulation, modulation, and high-level expression by vectors containing the arabinose PBAD promoter , 1995, Journal of bacteriology.

[16]  B. Pan,et al.  Solution structure of a phage-derived peptide antagonist in complex with vascular endothelial growth factor. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  Kit S Lam,et al.  From combinatorial chemistry to cancer-targeting peptides. , 2007, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[18]  P. Daugherty Protein engineering with bacterial display. , 2007, Current opinion in structural biology.

[19]  A. Pini,et al.  Synthetic Peptides in the Form of Dendrimers Become Resistant to Protease Activity* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  Patrick S Daugherty,et al.  Evolutionary optimization of fluorescent proteins for intracellular FRET , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[21]  J. Mccoy,et al.  Using bio-panning of FLITRX peptide libraries displayed on E. coli cell surface to study protein-protein interactions. , 2003, Methods in molecular biology.

[22]  G. Weiss,et al.  Optimizing the affinity and specificity of proteins with molecular display. , 2006, Molecular bioSystems.

[23]  Eric T. Boder,et al.  Yeast surface display for screening combinatorial polypeptide libraries , 1997, Nature Biotechnology.

[24]  Jeffrey J. Rice,et al.  Directed evolution of a biterminal bacterial display scaffold enhances the display of diverse peptides , 2008, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[25]  John Löfblom,et al.  A novel affinity protein selection system based on staphylococcal cell surface display and flow cytometry. , 2008, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[26]  Christos Stathopoulos,et al.  Display of heterologous proteins on the surface of microorganisms: From the screening of combinatorial libraries to live recombinant vaccines , 1997, Nature Biotechnology.

[27]  J. Theriot,et al.  Complex spatial distribution and dynamics of an abundant Escherichia coli outer membrane protein, LamB , 2004, Molecular microbiology.

[28]  S. Sidhu,et al.  Phage display for selection of novel binding peptides. , 2000, Methods in enzymology.

[29]  W. Dower,et al.  An in vitro polysome display system for identifying ligands from very large peptide libraries. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  E. Marinelli,et al.  A distinct strategy to generate high-affinity peptide binders to receptor tyrosine kinases. , 2005, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.