Clinical Implications and Economic Impact of Accuracy Differences among Commercially Available Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems

Background: Despite accuracy standards, there are performance differences among commercially available blood glucose monitoring (BGM) systems. The objective of this analysis was to assess the potential clinical and economic impact of accuracy differences of various BGM systems using a modeling approach. Methods: We simulated additional risk of hypoglycemia due to blood glucose (BG) measurement errors of five different BGM systems based on results of a real-world accuracy study, while retaining other sources of glycemic variability. Using data from published literature, we estimated an annual additional number of required medical interventions as a result of hypoglycemia. We based our calculations on patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and T2DM requiring multiple daily injections (MDIs) of insulin in a U.S. health care system. We estimated additional costs attributable to treatment of severe hypoglycemic episodes resulting from BG measurement errors. Results: Results from our model predict an annual difference of approximately 296,000 severe hypoglycemic episodes from BG measurement errors for T1DM (105,000 for T2DM MDI) patients for the estimated U.S. population of 958,800 T1DM and 1,353,600 T2DM MDI patients, using the least accurate BGM system versus patients using the most accurate system in a U.S. health care system. This resulted in additional direct costs of approximately $339 million for T1DM and approximately $121 million for T2DM MDI patients per year. Conclusion: Our analysis shows that error patterns over the operating range of BGM meter may lead to relevant clinical and economic outcome differences that may not be reflected in a common accuracy metric or standard. Further research is necessary to validate the findings of this model-based approach.

[1]  V. Basevi Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2011 , 2011, Diabetes Care.

[2]  B. Frier,et al.  Prevalence of impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia and frequency of hypoglycaemia in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes. , 2010, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[3]  Evaluation of a continuous glucose monitoring system for home-use conditions. , 2008, Managed care.

[4]  M. Pollack,et al.  Incidence and Cost of Hypoglycemia Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in the United States: Analysis of a Health Insurance Database , 2011 .

[5]  S. Amiel,et al.  Hypoglycaemia in Type 2 diabetes , 2008, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[6]  E R Carson,et al.  Five-compartment model of insulin kinetics and its use to investigate action of chloroquine in NIDDM. , 1993, The American journal of physiology.

[7]  Bern Harrison,et al.  Accuracy of the CONTOUR® Blood Glucose Monitoring System , 2011, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[8]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .

[9]  B. Ginsberg Factors Affecting Blood Glucose Monitoring: Sources of Errors in Measurement , 2009, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[10]  Andreas Pfützner,et al.  Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems obtained from the pharmacy: a European multicenter study with 453 subjects. , 2012, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[11]  Christina Schmid,et al.  System Accuracy Evaluation of 43 Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose according to DIN EN ISO 15197 , 2012, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[12]  Gunn B B Kristensen,et al.  Standardized evaluation of nine instruments for self-monitoring of blood glucose. , 2008, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[13]  C. Emery,et al.  Frequency of biochemical hypoglycaemia in adults with Type 1 diabetes with and without impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia: no identifiable differences using continuous glucose monitoring , 2010, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[14]  R. Bergman,et al.  Physiologic evaluation of factors controlling glucose tolerance in man: measurement of insulin sensitivity and beta-cell glucose sensitivity from the response to intravenous glucose. , 1981, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[15]  Guido Freckmann,et al.  System accuracy evaluation of 27 blood glucose monitoring systems according to DIN EN ISO 15197. , 2010, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[16]  R. Brazg,et al.  Accuracy of the 5-Day FreeStyle Navigator Continuous Glucose Monitoring System , 2007, Diabetes Care.

[17]  Roman Hovorka,et al.  Interstitial glucose kinetics in subjects with type 1 diabetes under physiologic conditions. , 2004, Metabolism: clinical and experimental.

[18]  Marc D Breton,et al.  Physical Activity—The Major Unaccounted Impediment to Closed Loop Control , 2008, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[19]  R. Parker,et al.  Dynamic Modeling of Exercise Effects on Plasma Glucose and Insulin Levels , 2007, Journal of diabetes science and technology.