Seat strength in rear body block tests

ABSTRACT Purpose: This study collected and analyzed available testing of motor vehicle seat strength in rearward loading by a body block simulating the torso of an occupant. The data were grouped by single recliner, dual recliner, and all belts to seat (ABTS) seats. Methods: The strength of seats to rearward loading has been evaluated with body block testing from 1964 to 2008. The database of available tests includes 217 single recliner, 65 dual recliner, and 18 ABTS seats. The trends in seat strength were determined by linear regression and differences between seat types were evaluated by Student's t-test. The average peak moment and force supported by the seat was determined by decade of vehicle model year (MY). Results: Single recliner seats were used in motor vehicles in the 1960s to 1970s. The average strength was 918 ± 224 Nm (n = 26) in the 1960s and 1,069 ± 293 Nm (n = 65) in the 1980s. There has been a gradual increase in strength over time. Dual recliner seats started to phase into vehicles in the late 1980s. By the 2000s, the average strength of single recliner seats increased to 1,501 ± 335 Nm (n = 14) and dual recliner seats to 2,302 ± 699 Nm (n = 26). Dual recliner seats are significantly stronger than single recliner seats for each decade of comparison (P < .001). The average strength of ABTS seats was 4,395 ± 1,185 in-lb for 1989–2004 MY seats (n = 18). ABTS seats are significantly stronger than single or dual recliner seats (P < .001). The trend in ABTS strength is decreasing with time and converging toward that of dual recliner seats. Conclusions: Body block testing is an quantitative means of evaluating the strength of seats for occupant loading in rear impacts. There has been an increase in conventional seat strength over the past 50 years. By the 2000s, most seats are 1,700–3,400 Nm moment strength. However, the safety of a seat is more complex than its strength and depends on many other factors.

[1]  D C Viano,et al.  The debate between stiff and yielding seats - a new generation of yielding seats with high retention in rear crashes , 2003 .

[2]  J. Kihlberg.  Flexion-torsion neck injury in rear impacts , 1969 .

[3]  Derwyn M. Severy,et al.  Vehicle design for passenger protection from high-speed rear-end collisions , 1968 .

[4]  David C. Viano,et al.  Severe Injury to Near- and Far-Seated Occupants in Side Impacts by Crash Severity and Belt Use , 2010, Traffic injury prevention.

[5]  Derwyn M. Severy,et al.  Safer Seat Designs , 1969 .

[6]  James H. Hedlund,et al.  A Search for Priorities in Crash Protection , 1982 .

[7]  D. Viano,et al.  Influence of Seating Position on Dummy Responses with ABTS Seats in Severe Rear Impacts , 2009 .

[8]  Louis N. Molino,et al.  PERFORMANCE OF SEATING SYSTEMS IN A FMVSS NO. 301 REAR IMPACT CRASH TEST , 2003 .

[9]  S Partyka,et al.  COMPARISONS OF BELT EFFECTIVENESS IN PREVENTING CHEST, HEAD, AND FACE INJURY IN FRONT AND REAR IMPACTS , 1990 .

[10]  Derwyn M. Severy,et al.  Collision Performance, LM Safety Car , 1967 .

[11]  David C Viano,et al.  Update on the Effectiveness of High Retention Seats in Preventing Fatal Injury in Rear Impacts , 2015, Traffic injury prevention.

[12]  J. H. Mathewson,et al.  Controlled automobile rearend collisions, an investigation of related engineering and medical phenomena. , 1955, Canadian services medical journal.

[13]  J. H. Morris,et al.  Safety Performance of Motor Vehicle Seats , 1993 .

[14]  D. M. Severy,et al.  AUTOMOBILE BARRIER AND REAR-END COLLISION PERFORMANCE , 1958 .

[15]  Michael B. James,et al.  Occupant Protection in Rear-end Collisions: I. Safety Priorities and Seat Belt Effectiveness , 1991 .

[16]  David C Viano,et al.  NASS-CDS Analysis of High Retention Seat Performance in Rear Impacts , 2015, Traffic injury prevention.

[17]  David C Viano,et al.  Seat Design Principles to Reduce Neck Injuries in Rear Impacts , 2008, Traffic injury prevention.

[18]  David C Viano,et al.  BioRID Dummy Responses in Matched ABTS and Conventional Seat Tests on the IIHS Rear Sled , 2011, Traffic injury prevention.

[19]  Derwyn M. Severy,et al.  BACKREST AND HEAD RESTRAINT DESIGN FOR REAR-END COLLISION PROTECTION , 1968 .

[20]  Derwyn M. Severy,et al.  AUTOMOTIVE SEAT DESIGN AND COLLISION PERFORMANCE , 1976 .

[21]  Michael S. Varat,et al.  Automotive Seat Design Concepts for Occupant Protection , 1993 .

[22]  A. C. Malliaris,et al.  Harm Causation and Ranking in Car Crashes , 1985 .

[23]  R. M. Zimmerman,et al.  Response of Belted Dummy and Cadaver to Rear Impact , 1977 .

[24]  David C. Viano,et al.  Role of the Seat in Rear Crash Safety , 2002 .

[25]  James H. McElhaney,et al.  OCCUPANT PROTECTION IN REAR END COLLISIONS , 1972 .

[26]  David C. Viano,et al.  Serious Injury in Very-Low and Very-High Speed Rear Impacts , 2008 .

[27]  David C. Viano,et al.  Energy Transfer to an Occupant in Rear Crashes: Effect of Stiff and Yielding Seats , 2003 .