Survival analysis of breast cancer patients using Cox and frailty models.

BACKGROUND Cox proportional hazard (CPH) model is the most widely used model for survival analysis. When there are unobserved/unmeasured individuals factor, then the results of the Cox proportional hazard model may not be reliable. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of CPH and frailty models in breast cancer (BC) patients. METHODS A historical cohort study was carried out using medical records gathered from the Fars Province Cancer Registry. The dataset consisted of 769 women having BC referred to Shiraz Namazi Hospital, south of Iran. These patients had been followed for 6 years. After selecting the most important prognostic risk factors on survival, CPH and gamma-frailty Cox models were used to estimate the effects of the risk factors. RESULTS The results of CPH model showed that, tumor characteristics and number of involved lymph nodes increase the mortality hazard of BC(P<0.05). In addition, the frailty model showed that there is at least a latent factor in the model (P=0.005). CONCLUSION Both of the frailty and CPH model emphasis that the early detection of BC improves survival in BC patients.

[1]  Aris Perperoglou,et al.  Approaches in modelling long‐term survival: an application to breast cancer , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[2]  W. D. Ray.  4. Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research , 1995 .

[3]  Gaëtan MacGrogan,et al.  Variables with time-varying effects and the Cox model: Some statistical concepts illustrated with a prognostic factor study in breast cancer , 2010, BMC medical research methodology.

[4]  M. Cowles.  Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research (2nd ed.) (Book) , 2004 .

[5]  A Tsodikov.  Semi-parametric models of long- and short-term survival: an application to the analysis of breast cancer survival in Utah by age and stage. , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[6]  T. Aghamolaei,et al.  IUD Survival and Its Determinants; a Historical Cohort Study. , 2007, Journal of research in health sciences.

[7]  P. Grambsch,et al.  A Package for Survival Analysis in S , 1994 .

[8]  Hongzhe Li,et al.  Multivariate survival models induced by genetic frailties, with application to linkage analysis. , 2002, Biostatistics.

[9]  D. Reidpath,et al.  Survival analysis of 1148 women diagnosed with breast cancer in Southern Iran , 2009, BMC Cancer.

[10]  Zhanshan Ma,et al.  Multivariate Survival Analysis (I): Shared Frailty Approaches to Reliability and Dependence Modeling , 2008, 2008 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[11]  H. Mahjub,et al.  Birth distance influential factors: a multilevel recurrent events approach. , 2010, Journal of research in health sciences.

[12]  N. Harbeck,et al.  Time-varying prognostic impact of tumour biological factors urokinase (uPA), PAI-1 and steroid hormone receptor status in primary breast cancer. , 1997, British Journal of Cancer.

[13]  Javad Faradmal,et al.  Comparison of three adjuvant chemotherapy regimes using an extended log-logistic model in women with operable breast cancer. , 2010, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[14]  A. Soltanian,et al.  A non-parametric method for hazard rate estimation in acute myocardial infarction patients: kernel smoothing approach. , 2012, Journal of research in health sciences.

[15]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[16]  D. Kleinbaum,et al.  Survival Analysis: A Self-Learning Text. , 1996 .

[17]  A. Mitnitski,et al.  Frailty in relation to the accumulation of deficits. , 2007, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[18]  S. Haghpanah,et al.  Knowledge and Practice of Patients with Breast Cancer about Complication of Chemotherapy , 2006 .

[19]  D. Boomsma,et al.  Gamma frailty model for linkage analysis with application to interval-censored migraine data. , 2008, Biostatistics.