Numerical Estimation in Adults with and without Developmental Dyscalculia.

It has been hypothesized that developmental dyscalculia (DD) is either due to a defect of the approximate number system (ANS) or to an impaired access between that system and symbolic numbers. Several studies have tested these two hypotheses in children with DD but none has dealt with adults who had experienced DD as children. This study aimed to compare these two hypotheses in an adult population in order to investigate which deficits still persist at that age. To that aim, numerical estimation tasks were given to adults who had or had not experienced DD as a child. Three of the estimation tasks required a mapping between the ANS and symbolic numbers: participants had to estimate the number of same or different-sized dots presented by producing the corresponding Arabic number or, conversely, to produce the number of dots corresponding to a presented Arabic number. A fourth task did not require any processing of symbolic numbers; participants had to produce a collection of dots of the same numerosity as another one previously presented. Consistently, in all the four numerical tasks and irrespective of whether the tasks used symbolic numbers or not, the estimates of DD participants were less accurate than those of the control participants. These results indicate that adults who had experienced DD as children continue to demonstrate a less precise magnitude representation.

[1]  A. Henik,et al.  Attention, automaticity, and developmental dyscalculia. , 2009, Neuropsychology.

[2]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Understanding dissociations in dyscalculia: a brain imaging study of the impact of number size on the cerebral networks for exact and approximate calculation. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  Andrea Facoetti,et al.  Developmental trajectory of number acuity reveals a severe impairment in developmental dyscalculia , 2010, Cognition.

[4]  Donna Coch,et al.  Human Behavior, Learning, and the Developing Brain: Typical Development. , 2010 .

[5]  Bert De Smedt,et al.  Defective number module or impaired access? Numerical magnitude processing in first graders with mathematical difficulties. , 2011, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[6]  Orly Manor,et al.  Developmental dyscalculia: a prospective six‐year follow‐up , 2005, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[7]  Jamie I. D. Campbell Handbook of mathematical cognition , 2004 .

[8]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Calibrating the mental number line , 2008, Cognition.

[9]  O Manor,et al.  DEVELOPMENTAL DYSCALCULIA: PREVALENCE AND DEMOGRAPHIC FEATURES , 1996 .

[10]  C. Gilmore,et al.  Children's mapping between symbolic and nonsymbolic representations of number. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[11]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement , 2008, Nature.

[12]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Cerebral Pathways for Calculation: Double Dissociation between Rote Verbal and Quantitative Knowledge of Arithmetic , 1997, Cortex.

[13]  E. Spelke,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Core systems of number , 2004 .

[14]  M. von Aster,et al.  Number development and developmental dyscalculia , 2007, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[15]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis, 4th ed. , 2005 .

[16]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[17]  O Manor,et al.  Developmental Dyscalculia Is a Familial Learning Disability , 2001, Journal of learning disabilities.

[18]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Core information processing deficits in developmental dyscalculia and low numeracy. , 2008, Developmental science.

[19]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Two mental calculation systems: A case study of severe acalculia with preserved approximation , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  Daniel B. Berch,et al.  Making Sense of Number Sense , 2005, Journal of learning disabilities.

[21]  M. Noël,et al.  Basic numerical skills in children with mathematics learning disabilities: A comparison of symbolic vs non-symbolic number magnitude processing , 2007, Cognition.

[22]  Rochel Gelman,et al.  Variability signatures distinguish verbal from nonverbal counting for both large and small numbers , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[23]  Gavin R. Price,et al.  Impaired parietal magnitude processing in developmental dyscalculia , 2007, Current Biology.

[24]  J. Wilson,et al.  Developmental differences in the span of visual memory for pattern , 1987 .

[25]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Mapping numerical magnitudes onto symbols: the numerical distance effect and individual differences in children's mathematics achievement. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[26]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Automatic activation of internal magnitudes: a study of developmental dyscalculia. , 2005, Neuropsychology.

[27]  Marie-Pascale Noël,et al.  Symbolic and nonsymbolic number comparison in children with and without dyscalculia , 2010, Cognition.

[28]  Marie-Pascale Noël,et al.  Magnitude comparison in preschoolers: what counts? Influence of perceptual variables. , 2004, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[29]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Handbook of Neuropsychology , 1991 .