Orientation of the opposition axis in mentally simulated grasping

Abstract. Five normal subjects were tested in a simulated grasping task. A cylindrical container filled with water was placed on the center of a horizontal monitor screen. Subjects used a precision grip formed by the thumb and index finger of their right hand. After a preliminary run during which the container was present, it was replaced by an image of the upper surface of the cylinder appearing on the horizontal computer screen on which the real cylinder was placed during the preliminary run. In each trial the image was marked with two contact points which defined an opposition axis in various orientations with respect to the frontal plane. The subjects' task consisted, once shown a stimulus, of judging as quickly as possible whether the previously experienced action of grasping the container full of water and pouring the water out would be easy, difficult or impossible with the fingers placed according to the opposition axis indicated on the circle. Response times were found to be longer for the grasps judged to be more difficult due to the orientation and position of the opposition axis. In a control experiment, three subjects actually performed the grasps with different orientations and positions of the opposition axis. The effects of these parameters on response time followed the same trends as during simulated movements. This result shows that simulated hand movements take into account the same biomechanical limitations as actually performed movements.

[1]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Influence of object position and size on human prehension movements , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  Peter Ford Dominey,et al.  Motor imagery of a lateralized sequential task is asymmetrically slowed in hemi-Parkinson's patients , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Motor processes in mental rotation , 1998, Cognition.

[4]  J R NAPIER,et al.  The form and function of the carpo-metacarpal joint of the thumb. , 1955, Journal of anatomy.

[5]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Orienting the finger opposition space during prehension movements. , 1994, Journal of motor behavior.

[6]  J. Napier The prehensile movements of the human hand. , 1956, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[7]  A. Milner,et al.  Visuomotor sensitivity for shape and orientation in a patient with visual form agnosia , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  M. Jeannerod Mental imagery in the motor context , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  Ivan Toni,et al.  On orienting the hand to reach and grasp an object , 1996, Neuroreport.

[11]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Mentally simulated movements in virtual reality: does Fitt's law hold in motor imagery? , 1995, Behavioural Brain Research.

[12]  M. Arbib,et al.  Opposition Space as a Structuring Concept for the Analysis of Skilled Hand Movements , 1986 .

[13]  S. H. Johnson,et al.  Thinking ahead: the case for motor imagery in prospective judgements of prehension , 2000, Cognition.

[14]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Mental imaging of motor activity in humans , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[15]  Peter T. Fox,et al.  The neural basis of implicit movements used in recognising hand shape , 1998 .

[16]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Mapping motor representations with positron emission tomography , 1994, Nature.

[17]  L. Parsons Imagined spatial transformations of one's hands and feet , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  L. Parsons Temporal and kinematic properties of motor behavior reflected in mentally simulated action. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  A. Sirigu,et al.  The Mental Representation of Hand Movements After Parietal Cortex Damage , 1996, Science.