Discrete event command and control for networked teams with multiple missions

During mission execution in military applications, the TRADOC Pamphlet 525-66 Battle Command and Battle Space Awareness capabilities prescribe expectations that networked teams will perform in a reliable manner under changing mission requirements, varying resource availability and reliability, and resource faults. In this paper, a Command and Control (C2) structure is presented that allows for computer-aided execution of the networked team decision-making process, control of force resources, shared resource dispatching, and adaptability to change based on battlefield conditions. A mathematically justified networked computing environment is provided called the Discrete Event Control (DEC) Framework. DEC has the ability to provide the logical connectivity among all team participants including mission planners, field commanders, war-fighters, and robotic platforms. The proposed data management tools are developed and demonstrated on a simulation study and an implementation on a distributed wireless sensor network. The results show that the tasks of multiple missions are correctly sequenced in real-time, and that shared resources are suitably assigned to competing tasks under dynamically changing conditions without conflicts and bottlenecks.

[1]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Manufacturing Systems Control Design: A Matrix-based Approach (Advances in Industrial Control) , 2006 .

[2]  Richard A. Wysk,et al.  Detection of deadlocks in flexible manufacturing cells , 1991, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[3]  S. Kanungo,et al.  Rule-base content verification using a digraph-based modelling approach , 1999, Artif. Intell. Eng..

[4]  D. V. Steward,et al.  The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[5]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  A new matrix model for discrete event systems: application to simulation , 1997 .

[6]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Machine planning for manufacturing: dynamic resource allocation and on-line supervisory control , 1998, J. Intell. Manuf..

[7]  James S. Albus Intelligent Systems Design , 2008 .

[8]  Billy Harris,,et al.  Automatically Generating Plans for Manufacturing , 2000 .

[9]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  Intelligent scheduling of automated machining systems , 1992 .

[10]  Stuart H. Young,et al.  System design for robot agent team , 2002, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[11]  Kevin L. Moore,et al.  Autonomy and manual operation in a small robotic system for under-vehicle inspections at security checkpoints , 2002, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[12]  Kevin L. Moore,et al.  Intelligent behavior generator for autonomous mobile robots using planning-based AI decision making and supervisory control logic , 2002, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[13]  Giancarlo Mauri,et al.  Evaluating Performance and Quality of Knowledge-Based Systems: Foundation and Methodology , 1993, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[14]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Analysis of Deadlock and Circular Waits Using a Matrix Model for Flexible Manufacturing Systems , 1998, Autom..

[15]  John N. Warfield,et al.  Binary Matrices in System Modeling , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[16]  Steven A. Thibadoux Robotic acquisition programs: technical and performance challenges , 2002, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[17]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Matrix approach to deadlock-free dispatching in multi-class finite buffer flowlines , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[18]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Combining Representations from Manufacturing, Machine Planning, and Manufacturing Resource Planning (MRP) , 2000 .

[19]  B. Turchiano,et al.  Supervisory control of mobile sensor networks: math formulation, simulation, and implementation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[20]  Jonathan A. Bornstein Army ground robotics research program , 2002, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.