A pleasure working together? The effects of dissimilarity in team member conscientiousness on team temporal processes and individual satisfaction

In this study of 43 student project teams, we tested a multi-level mediation model of the relationship between dissimilarity in conscientiousness, team temporal processes, and team member satisfaction. We distinguished between individual-level dissimilarity in conscientiousness (i.e., the distance between an individual member and his or her team mates), and team-level dissimilarity in conscientiousness (i.e., the overall dissimilarity within the team). Individual-level dissimilarity in conscientiousness had a direct negative effect on team members' satisfaction with the team, but did not affect their satisfaction with the team's performance. Team-level dissimilarity in conscientiousness indirectly affected both types of satisfaction negatively as it impeded early agreement about the temporal aspects of task execution, which, in turn, hindered coordinated action in later stages of team task execution. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  William R. King,et al.  Project Management Handbook , 1983 .

[2]  Kathleen Otto,et al.  Positive Conceptions of Perfectionism: Approaches, Evidence, Challenges , 2006, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[3]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  Person-Job Fit Applied to Teamwork , 2004 .

[4]  Linda C. Angell,et al.  Surface- and deep-level diversity in workgroups: Examining the moderating effects of team orientation and team process on relationship conflict , 2004 .

[5]  H. F. van Tuijl,et al.  The Big Five Personality Traits and Individual Satisfaction With the Team , 2006 .

[6]  A. Tsui,et al.  Beyond Simple Demographic Effects: The Importance of Relational Demography in Superior-Subordinate Dyads , 1989 .

[7]  John Adams,et al.  Behavioral Implications of the Project Life Cycle , 2008 .

[8]  J. McGrath.  Social Psychology: A Brief Introduction , 1964 .

[9]  J. H. Steiger.  Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach. , 1990, Multivariate behavioral research.

[10]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling With the Simplis Command Language , 1993 .

[11]  Daniel Heller,et al.  Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: a meta-analysis. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  Nokes Kn,et al.  Assessing the work environment. , 1986 .

[13]  B. Lilly,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF CONFLICT, TRUST, AND TASK COMMITMENT ON PROJECT TEAM PERFORMANCE , 1996 .

[14]  B. Tuckman.  DEVELOPMENTAL SEQUENCE IN SMALL GROUPS. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  Jmp Josette Gevers,et al.  How project teams achieve coordinated action : a model of shared cognitions on time , 2004 .

[16]  J. George,et al.  Understanding prosocial behavior, sales performance, and turnover: A group-level analysis in a service context. , 1990 .

[17]  C. Gersick.  MARKING TIME: PREDICTABLE TRANSITIONS IN TASK GROUPS , 1989 .

[18]  J. M. Digman.  PERSONALITY STRUCTURE: EMERGENCE OF THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL , 1990 .

[19]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[20]  Paul E. Spector.  Job satisfaction: application, assessment, cause, and consequences , 1997 .

[21]  Caroline A. Bartel,et al.  Talking about time: Effects of temporal planning and time awareness norms on group coordination and performance. , 2003 .

[22]  K. Smith-Jentsch,et al.  Team dimensional training: A strategy for guided team self-correction. , 1998 .

[23]  Carolyn Prince,et al.  An Overview of Team Performance Measurement , 1997 .

[24]  Tjai M. Nielsen,et al.  Group Personality Composition and Group Effectiveness , 2005 .

[25]  Thamhaim Hj,et al.  Conflict management in project life cycles. , 1975, Sloan management review.

[26]  E. Sundstrom,et al.  Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. , 1990 .

[27]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[28]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. , 1992 .

[29]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[30]  K. Jehn.  A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in , 1997 .

[31]  B. De Raad,et al.  The Five-Factor Personality Inventory (FFPI) , 1999 .

[32]  W. Hacker.  Action Regulation Theory: A practical tool for the design of modern work processes? , 2003 .

[33]  J. Stoker,et al.  Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams , 1997 .

[34]  Robert C. Giambatista,et al.  Watching The Clock: Group Pacing Behavior Under Dynamic Deadlines , 2002 .

[35]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[36]  D. L. Gladstein.  Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. , 1984 .

[37]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  Clarifying conditions and decision points for mediational type inferences in Organizational Behavior , 2006 .

[38]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[39]  D. Chan.  Functional Relations among Constructs in the Same Content Domain at Different Levels of Analysis: A Typology of Composition Models , 1998 .

[40]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  Searching for Common Threads: Understanding the Multiple Effects of Diversity in Organizational Groups , 1996 .

[41]  Leigh Thompson,et al.  Making the Team: A Guide for Managers , 2003 .

[42]  Isabelle M. M. J. Reymen,et al.  Personality and team performance: a meta‐analysis , 2006 .

[43]  Dieter Zapf,et al.  Social stressors at work, irritation, and depressive symptoms: Accounting for unmeasured third variables in a multi‐wave study , 2002 .

[44]  Charles A. O'Reilly,et al.  Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. , 1991 .

[45]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes , 2001 .

[46]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[47]  C. Gibson,et al.  Team Implicit Coordination Processes: A Team Knowledge–Based Approach , 2008 .

[48]  Randall S. Peterson,et al.  A Multi-faceted Approach to Process Conflict , 2002 .

[49]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  A longitudinal study of the relation of vision and vision communication to venture growth in entrepreneurial firms. , 1998 .

[50]  D. Harrison,et al.  Beyond Relational Demography: Time and the Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Work Group Cohesion , 1998 .

[51]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS , 1993 .

[52]  G. Northcraft,et al.  You have printed the following article : Why Differences Make a Difference : A Field Study of Diversity , Conflict , and Performance in Workgroups , 2007 .

[53]  G. Stewart.  A Meta-Analytic Review of Relationships Between Team Design Features and Team Performance , 2006 .

[54]  D. Jackson,et al.  PERSONALITY MEASURES AS PREDICTORS OF JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYTIC REVIEW , 2006 .

[55]  D. Byrne.  The Attraction Paradigm , 1971 .

[56]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity , 1996 .

[57]  J. Richard Hackman,et al.  The interaction of task design and group performance strategies in determining group effectiveness , 1976 .

[58]  J. Bishop,et al.  An examination of organizational and team commitment in a self-directed team environment. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[59]  M. D. Dunnette.  Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2005 .

[60]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[61]  M. Audrey Korsgaard,et al.  The Antecedents and Consequences of Group Potency: A Longitudinal Investigation of Newly Formed Work Groups , 2002 .

[62]  R. Tett,et al.  A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[63]  Wendelien van Eerde,et al.  A meta-analytically derived nomological network of procrastination , 2003 .

[64]  R. Golembiewski.  Handbook of Organizational Behavior , 2001 .

[65]  C. Gersick.  Time and Transition in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group Development , 1988 .

[66]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[67]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Team Performance Assessment and Measurement: Theory, Methods, and Applications. Series in Applied Psychology. , 1997 .

[68]  Cg Christel Rutte,et al.  Meeting deadlines in work groups: Implicit and explicit mechanisms , 2006 .

[69]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams , 2006, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[70]  G. Gelade.  Creative style, personality, and artistic endeavor. , 2002, Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs.

[71]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. , 1998 .

[72]  A. Tellegen,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES An Alternative "Description of Personality": The Big-Five Factor Structure , 2022 .

[73]  Rita Gunther McGrath,et al.  Three facets of satisfaction and their influence on the performance of innovation teams , 1996 .

[74]  F. Tschan,et al.  Getting groups to develop good strategies: Effects of reflexivity interventions on team process, team performance, and shared mental models , 2007 .

[75]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[76]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Data analysis in social psychology. , 1998 .

[77]  H. Tajfel.  Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. , 1978 .

[78]  C. Gersick,et al.  Habitual routines in task-performing groups. , 1990, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[79]  Gregory J. Feist.  A Meta-Analysis of Personality in Scientific and Artistic Creativity , 1998, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[80]  J. Mathieu,et al.  A framework for testing meso‐mediational relationships in Organizational Behavior , 2007 .

[81]  J. Gevers,et al.  Team self-regulation and meeting deadlines in project teams: Antecedents and effects of temporal consensus , 2009 .

[82]  Frank J. Bernieri,et al.  Measuring Person Perception Accuracy: Another Look at Self-Other Agreement , 1994 .

[83]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[84]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[85]  P. Bentler,et al.  Fit indices in covariance structure modeling : Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification , 1998 .

[86]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Team Mental Model: Construct or Metaphor? , 1994 .

[87]  Cristina B. Gibson,et al.  The Effect Of Individual Perceptions of Deadlines on Team Performance , 2001 .

[88]  J. George,et al.  When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: an interactional approach. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[89]  Jennifer M. George,et al.  Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. , 1990 .

[90]  E. Mannix,et al.  The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance. , 2001 .

[91]  H. Tajfel.  Social identity and intergroup relations , 1985 .

[92]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[93]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Organizational Demography: The Differential Effects of Age and Tenure Distributions on Technical Communication , 1989 .

[94]  David C. Funder,et al.  Agreement among judges of personality: interpersonal relations, similarity, and acquaintanceship. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.