Using Gis Tools to Support E_Participation - A Systematic Evaluation

In this paper a systematic evaluation is presented of an e-participation platform based on GIS tools. The evaluation methodology is founded on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), which has been elaborated and adapted to this particular type of IS, taking into account the particular objectives and capabilities of this platform. Our main evaluation dimensions were usage, ease of use, functional usefulness, political usefulness and importance of discussion topic; each of them has been analyzed into a number of sub-dimensions. Using this methodology five pilot applications of this platform in 'real-life' situations and problems have been evaluated with both quantitative and qualitative techniques. Finally it has been concluded that the use of GIS tools can provide significant value in the area of e-participation, which however depends on a number of context factors, such as citizens' computer literacy and familiarization, trust to the political system, interest of the sponsoring public authorities, appropriate promotion, importance of the topic under discussion and quantity and quality of reference information appended on the digital maps by public authorities.

[1]  David Targett,et al.  A taxonomy of information systems applications: the benefits' evaluation ladder , 1995 .

[2]  William R. King,et al.  A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[3]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[4]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  ENHANCING DELIBERATION FOR THE FORMULATION AND APPLICATION OF PUBLIC POLICY ON THE ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY USING FEDERATED CONTENT, ONTOLOGIES AND MAPS , 2012 .

[5]  Judith E. Innes,et al.  Implementing GIS for Planning Lessons from the History of Technological Innovation , 1993 .

[6]  Frank F. Land,et al.  Evaluation of Systems Goals in Determining a Design Strategy for a Computer Based Information System , 1976, Comput. J..

[7]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Researching the investment of information technology in construction: An examination of evaluation practices , 2005 .

[8]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[9]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Analysing information systems evaluation: another look at an old problem , 1998 .

[10]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  USING E-MAPS AND SEMANTIC ANNOTATION FOR IMPROVING CITIZENS' AND ADMINISTRATIONS' INTERACTION , 2009 .

[11]  S. Carver.  Participation and Geographical Information : a position paper , 2001 .

[12]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Quantitative and qualitative approaches to information systems evaluation , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Daniel Weiner,et al.  Community participation and geographic information systems. , 2002 .

[14]  Richard J. Holden,et al.  The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care , 2010, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[15]  Piotr Jankowski,et al.  Map-centred exploratory approach to multiple criteria spatial decision making , 2001, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[16]  Fred D. Davis.  A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems : theory and results , 1985 .

[17]  David Targett,et al.  IS evaluation: a process for bringing together benefits, costs and risks , 1999 .

[18]  Martin Wetzels,et al.  A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects , 2007, Inf. Manag..