Suppression of visual perception by transcranial magnetic stimulation--experimental findings in healthy subjects and patients with optic neuritis.

The influence of noninvasive magnetic brain stimulation by a magnetic coil (MC) placed over the occiput on perception and correct reporting of a briefly presented set of 3 letters of the alphabet was examined in 15 patients with prolonged VEP latencies due to neuritis of the optic nerve. The results derived from observing these patients were compared to the results obtained from an age-matched control group of 20 healthy voluntary subjects examined under the same experimental conditions. In both groups it was possible to demonstrate that transcranial magnetic stimulation is able to suppress recognition of the letters if applied with a certain delay time after a brief presentation of the visual stimulus. The groups were compared to each other with regard to the delay with which it was possible to demonstrate the most effective suppression. In the healthy subjects, this delay was found between 60 and 100 msec. In the patients, it was prolonged to 80-140 msec. This prolongation was closely related to the VEP latency (P100). Furthermore, visual suppression and the influence on it by different parameters were studied in detail in healthy subjects; the visual suppression depends on visual (e.g., brightness, duration) and magnetic (e.g., intensity) stimulus conditions. The method described seems to be of considerable value in the investigation of basic mechanisms of visual perception. This includes pathophysiological changes caused by optic neuritis and possibly other disorders affecting the visual system.

[1]  K. Mills,et al.  Central motor conduction studies in motor neurone disease using magnetic brain stimulation. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  A. Barker Magnetic stimulation of the human brain , 1985 .

[3]  B L Day,et al.  Delay in the execution of voluntary movement by electrical or magnetic brain stimulation in intact man. Evidence for the storage of motor programs in the brain. , 1989, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  B. Meyer,et al.  Variability of cortically evoked motor responses in multiple sclerosis. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  K. Mills,et al.  Magnetic brain stimulation: Central motor conduction studies in multiple sclerosis , 1987, Annals of neurology.

[6]  S C Gandevia,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation can influence the selection of motor programmes. , 1990, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[7]  D. Silberberg,et al.  New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines for research protocols , 1983, Annals of neurology.

[8]  C. Elger,et al.  Functional deficits of central sensory and motor pathways in patients with cervical spinal stenosis: a study of SEPs and EMG responses to non-invasive brain stimulation. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  M. Swash,et al.  Central motor conduction in multiple sclerosis: evaluation of abnormalities revealed by transcutaneous magnetic stimulation of the brain. , 1988, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[10]  V. Amassian,et al.  Suppression of visual perception by magnetic coil stimulation of human occipital cortex. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  N Accornero,et al.  Stimulation of motor tracts in motor neuron disease. , 1987, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[12]  E Marg,et al.  Magnetostimulation of Vision: Direct Noninvasive Stimulation of the Retina and the Visual Brain , 1991, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.