Effect of consonant-vowel ratio modification on amplitude envelope cues for consonant recognition.

This investigation examined the degree to which modification of the consonant-vowel (C-V) intensity ratio affected consonant recognition under conditions in which listeners were forced to rely more heavily on waveform envelope cues than on spectral cues. The stimuli were 22 vowel-consonant-vowel utterances, which had been mixed at six different signal-to-noise ratios with white noise that had been modulated by the speech waveform envelope. The resulting waveforms preserved the gross speech envelope shape, but spectral cues were limited by the white-noise masking. In a second stimulus set, the consonant portion of each utterance was amplified by 10 dB. Sixteen subjects with normal hearing listened to the unmodified stimuli, and 16 listened to the amplified-consonant stimuli. Recognition performance was reduced in the amplified-consonant condition for some consonants, presumably because waveform envelope cues had been distorted. However, for other consonants, especially the voiced stops, consonant amplification improved recognition. Patterns of errors were altered for several consonant groups, including some that showed only small changes in recognition scores. The results indicate that when spectral cues are compromised, nonlinear amplification can alter waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition.

[1]  N. P. Erber,et al.  Speech perception by profoundly hearing-impaired children. , 1979, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[2]  B C Moore,et al.  A comparison of two-channel and single-channel compression hearing aids. , 1986, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[3]  S. Rosen,et al.  Prosodic and segmental aspects of speech perception with the House/3M single-channel implant. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[4]  P K Kuhl,et al.  The contribution of fundamental frequency, amplitude envelope, and voicing duration cues to speechreading in normal-hearing subjects. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  S E Blumstein,et al.  On the role of the amplitude envelope for the perception of [b] and [w]. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Jorge A. Gurlekian,et al.  Recognition of the Spanish fricatives /s/ and /f/ , 1981 .

[7]  Guelke Rw,et al.  Consonant burst enhancement: a possible means to improve intelligibility for the hard of hearing. , 1987 .

[8]  S. Blumstein,et al.  On the role of the amplitude of the fricative noise in the perception of place of articulation in voiceless fricative consonants. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  R Plomp,et al.  The negative effect of amplitude compression in multichannel hearing aids in the light of the modulation-transfer function. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  M Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  The stop-glide distinction: acoustic analysis and perceptual effect of variation in syllable amplitude envelope for initial /b/ and /w/. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  D J Van Tasell,et al.  Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  A Boothroyd,et al.  Amplitude compression and profound hearing loss. , 1988, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[13]  R L Freyman,et al.  The importance of consonant-vowel intensity ratio in the intelligibility of voiceless consonants. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[14]  B J Edgerton,et al.  Effects of signal processing by the House-3M cochlear implant on consonant perception. , 1984, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[15]  G. A. Miller,et al.  An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants , 1955 .

[16]  K. Stevens,et al.  On the Properties of Voiceless Fricative Consonants , 1961 .

[17]  S. Gordon-Salant Recognition of natural and time/intensity altered CVs by young and elderly subjects with normal hearing. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Effects of acoustic modification on consonant recognition by elderly hearing-impaired subjects. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  A. House,et al.  A masking noise with speech-envelope characteristics for studying intelligibility. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  R Plomp,et al.  Speechreading supplemented with auditorily presented speech parameters. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  A A Montgomery,et al.  Evaluation of two speech enhancement techniques to improve intelligibility for hearing-impaired adults. , 1988, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[22]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Limitations of context conditioned effects in the perception of [b] and [w] , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.