What Determines the Critical Electric Field of AFE-to-FE in Pb(Zr,Sn,Ti)O3-Based Perovskites?

Electric-field-induced antiferroelectric-ferroelectric (AFE-FE) phase transition is a prominent feature of antiferroelectric (AFE) materials. The critical electric field of this phase transition is crucial for the device performance of AEFs in many applications, but the determining factor of the critical electric field is still unclear. Here, we have established the correlation between the underlying structure and the critical electric field by using in situ synchrotron X-ray diffraction and high-resolution neutron diffraction in Pb(Zr,Sn,Ti)O3-based antiferroelectrics. It is found that the critical electric field is determined by the angle between the average polarization vector in the incommensurate AFE state and the [111]P polarization direction in the rhombohedral FE state. A large polarization rotation angle gives rise to a large critical electric field. Further, density functional theory (DFT) calculations corroborate that the lower energy is required for driving a smaller angle polarization rotation. Our discovery will offer guidance to optimize the performance of AFE materials.

[1]  L. Kourkoutis,et al.  Liberating a hidden antiferroelectric phase with interfacial electrostatic engineering , 2022, Science advances.

[2]  Longlong Fan,et al.  Direct Observation of Polarization Rotation in the Monoclinic MB Phase under Electrical Loading. , 2021, Inorganic chemistry.

[3]  Ge Wang,et al.  Electroceramics for High-Energy Density Capacitors: Current Status and Future Perspectives , 2021, Chemical reviews.

[4]  Shiqing Deng,et al.  An Intriguing Polarization Configuration of Mixed Ising- and Néel-Type Model in the Prototype PbZrO3-Based Antiferroelectrics. , 2021, Inorganic Chemistry.

[5]  M. Guennou,et al.  Critical field anisotropy in the antiferroelectric switching of PbZrO3 films , 2020 .

[6]  Genshui Wang,et al.  Unveiling the ferrielectric nature of PbZrO3-based antiferroelectric materials , 2020, Nature Communications.

[7]  H. Hwang,et al.  Strain-induced room-temperature ferroelectricity in SrTiO3 membranes , 2020, Nature Communications.

[8]  C. Stampfl,et al.  A first-principles study of the effects of atom impurities, defects, strain, electric field and layer thickness on the electronic and magnetic properties of the C2N nanosheet , 2020, Carbon.

[9]  C. Lyu,et al.  TEM study of incommensurate superstructure in Pb1−0.5xNbx((Zr0.52Sn0.48)0.955Ti0.045)1−xO3 ceramics with 0–1 switching characteristic strain and high energy storage density , 2019, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics.

[10]  J. Deng,et al.  Structural Evidence for Strong Coupling between Polarization Rotation and Lattice Strain in Monoclinic Relaxor Ferroelectrics , 2017 .

[11]  Xihong Hao,et al.  A comprehensive review on the progress of lead zirconate-based antiferroelectric materials , 2014 .

[12]  A. Tagantsev,et al.  The origin of antiferroelectricity in PbZrO3 , 2013, Nature Communications.

[13]  X. Tan,et al.  Strains and Polarization During Antiferroelectric-Ferroelectric Phase Switching in Pb0.99Nb0.02[(Zr0.57Sn0.43)1−yTiy]0.98O3 Ceramics , 2011 .

[14]  Long-Qing Chen,et al.  Effect of grain orientation and grain size on ferroelectric domain switching and evolution: Phase field simulations , 2007 .

[15]  Ronald E. Cohen,et al.  Polarization rotation mechanism for ultrahigh electromechanical response in single-crystal piezoelectrics , 2000, Nature.

[16]  W. J. Merz Switching Time in Ferroelectric BaTiO3 and Its Dependence on Crystal Thickness , 1956 .

[17]  Ke Xu,et al.  An intriguing canting dipole configuration and its evolution under an electric field in La-doped Pb(Zr,Sn,Ti)O3 perovskites , 2022, Microstructures.