Algorithmic Game Theory: Cascading Behavior in Networks: Algorithmic and Economic Issues

The flow of information or influence through a large social network can be thought of as unfolding with the dynamics of an epidemic: as individuals become aware of new ideas, technologies, fads, rumors, or gossip, they have the potential to pass them on to their friends and colleagues, causing the resulting behavior to cascade through the network. We consider a collection of probabilistic and game-theoretic models for such phenomena proposed in the mathematical social sciences, as well as recent algorithmic work on the problem by computer scientists. Building on this, we discuss the implications of cascading behavior in a number of on-line settings, including word-of-mouth effects (also known as “viral marketing”) in the success of new products, and the influence of social networks in the growth of on-line

[1]  Alexander Grey,et al.  The Mathematical Theory of Infectious Diseases and Its Applications , 1977 .

[2]  N. Ling The Mathematical Theory of Infectious Diseases and its applications , 1978 .

[3]  Mark S. Granovetter Threshold Models of Collective Behavior , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  M. L. Fisher,et al.  An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions—I , 1978, Math. Program..

[5]  T. Schelling Micromotives and Macrobehavior , 1978 .

[6]  R. Durrett Lecture notes on particle systems and percolation , 1988 .

[7]  Glenn Ellison Learning, Local Interaction, and Coordination , 1993 .

[8]  L. Blume The Statistical Mechanics of Strategic Interaction , 1993 .

[9]  Thomas W. Valente Network models of the diffusion of innovations , 1996, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[10]  H. Peyton Young,et al.  Individual Strategy and Social Structure , 2020 .

[11]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[12]  Matthew Richardson,et al.  Mining the network value of customers , 2001, KDD '01.

[13]  M. Newman Spread of epidemic disease on networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[14]  Jon Kleinberg,et al.  Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network , 2003, KDD '03.

[15]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[16]  Ravi Kumar,et al.  Structure and evolution of blogspace , 2004, CACM.

[17]  Ramanathan V. Guha,et al.  Information diffusion through blogspace , 2004, WWW '04.

[18]  Eytan Adar,et al.  Implicit Structure and the Dynamics of Blogspace , 2004 .

[19]  Noga Alon,et al.  Percolation on finite graphs and isoperimetric inequalities , 2004 .

[20]  Peter Sheridan Dodds,et al.  Universal behavior in a generalized model of contagion. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[21]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics on graphs , 2005, Nature.

[22]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Influential Nodes in a Diffusion Model for Social Networks , 2005, ICALP.

[23]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Group formation in large social networks: membership, growth, and evolution , 2006, KDD '06.

[24]  Michael Kearns,et al.  Networks preserving evolutionary equilibria and the power of randomization , 2006, EC '06.

[25]  Leeat Yariv,et al.  Diusion on Social Networks , 2006 .

[26]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Patterns of Influence in a Recommendation Network , 2006, PAKDD.

[27]  Elchanan Mossel,et al.  On the submodularity of influence in social networks , 2006, STOC '07.

[28]  Kathleen C. Schwartzman,et al.  DIFFUSION IN ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIAL MOVEMENTS: From Hybrid Corn to Poison Pills , 2007 .

[29]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  The dynamics of viral marketing , 2005, EC '06.

[30]  Stefan Grosskinsky Warwick,et al.  Interacting Particle Systems , 2016 .