How Much Progress Has Been Made in Corneal Transplantation?

Abstract: To assess the benefits of component lamellar corneal surgery, we investigated the surgical outcomes of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) for keratoconus and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) for laser iridotomy-induced bullous keratopathy (LI-BK). The results were compared with the surgical outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty (PKP). Seventy-nine eyes with keratoconus treated with DALK and 81 eyes with LI-BK treated with DSAEK were studied, and the graft clarity rate, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, endothelial cell density (ECD), and surgical complications were compared with 273 eyes with keratoconus and 98 eyes with LI-BK all treated with PKP. Keratoconus eyes showed excellent visual outcomes with DALK and PKP, but graft survival was higher for PKP (100%, 98.9%, and 96.3% vs. 98.6%, 90.6%, and 86.1%, at 1, 3, and 5 years after surgery, respectively; P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in the ECD up to 1 year after surgery. Greater ECD decline was observed for PKP at 3 and 5 years after surgery. Descemet membrane microperforation was observed in 49 eyes treated with DALK. Postoperative complications in eyes treated with PKP were increased incidence of immunological rejection and secondary glaucoma compared with eyes treated with DALK. LI-BK graft survival rates were excellent in both groups (DSAEK: 89.6% and 86.1%; PKP: 100% and 98.6%, 1- and 2-year rates, respectively; P = 0.17). Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was better in the DSAEK group, and ECD showed a higher rate of decrease with DSAEK than with PKP. DALK and DSAEK considerably improved surgical outcomes in eyes with keratoconus and those with LI-BK, respectively. However, several key areas require further work, including development of safe surgical methods in DALK and prevention of early postoperative ECD loss in DSAEK.

[1]  D. Coster,et al.  A comparison of lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty outcomes: a registry study. , 2014, Ophthalmology.

[2]  Elsie Chan,et al.  Long-term Outcomes of Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty Versus Penetrating Keratoplasty in Australian Keratoconus Patients , 2014, Cornea.

[3]  T. Inatomi,et al.  Clinical outcomes in descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with internationally shipped precut donor corneas. , 2014, American journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  N. Shinozaki,et al.  Influence of the Precutting and Overseas Transportation of Corneal Grafts for Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty on Donor Endothelial Cell Loss , 2013, Cornea.

[5]  Myung Hun Kim,et al.  A Retrospective Contralateral Study Comparing Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty With Penetrating Keratoplasty , 2013, Cornea.

[6]  H. Menegay,et al.  Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: three-year graft and endothelial cell survival compared with penetrating keratoplasty. , 2013, Ophthalmology.

[7]  Marcus Ang,et al.  Endothelial cell loss and graft survival after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty. , 2012, Ophthalmology.

[8]  Thomas Gaujoux,et al.  Long-term results of deep anterior lamellar versus penetrating keratoplasty. , 2012, Ophthalmology.

[9]  E. Pels,et al.  Endothelial cell loss and visual outcome of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty: a randomized multicenter clinical trial. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[10]  Roni M. Shtein,et al.  Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty as an alternative to penetrating keratoplasty a report by the american academy of ophthalmology. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[11]  S. Debanne,et al.  Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty outcomes compared with penetrating keratoplasty from the Cornea Donor Study. , 2010, Ophthalmology.

[12]  J. Shimazaki.  Double‐bubble technique to facilitate Descemet membrane exposure in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty , 2010, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[13]  M. Terry.  Endothelial keratoplasty: a comparison of complication rates and endothelial survival between precut tissue and surgeon-cut tissue by a single DSAEK surgeon. , 2009, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[14]  J. Mehta,et al.  Comparison of outcomes of lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus. , 2009, American journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  J. Mehta,et al.  Outcomes of therapeutic deep lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty for advanced infectious keratitis: a comparative study. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[16]  K. Tsubota,et al.  Late irreversible corneal oedema after laser iridotomy , 2007, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[17]  I. Bahar,et al.  Comparison of three different techniques of corneal transplantation for keratoconus. , 2008, American journal of ophthalmology.

[18]  K. Sugiyama,et al.  Non-Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for endothelial dysfunction secondary to argon laser iridotomy. , 2008, American journal of ophthalmology.

[19]  K. Sugiyama,et al.  Descemet Stripping with Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty for Bullous Keratopathies Secondary to Argon Laser Iridotomy-Preliminary Results and Usefulness of Double-Glide Donor Insertion Technique , 2008, Cornea.

[20]  Y. Chan,et al.  Penetrating keratoplasty in Asian eyes: the Singapore Corneal Transplant Study. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[21]  L. Laroche,et al.  Comparison of techniques used for removing the recipient stroma in anterior lamellar keratoplasty. , 2008, Archives of ophthalmology.

[22]  William J Dupps,et al.  Visual Acuity, Refractive Error, and Endothelial Cell Density Six Months After Descemet Stripping and Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) , 2007, Cornea.

[23]  V. Shanmuganathan,et al.  Argon laser iridotomy-induced bullous keratopathy—a growing problem in Japan , 2007, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[24]  K. Tsubota,et al.  Impact of the descemet membrane perforation on surgical outcomes after deep lamellar keratoplasty. , 2007, American journal of ophthalmology.

[25]  Luigi Fontana,et al.  Clinical outcomes after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty using the big-bubble technique in patients with keratoconus. , 2007, American journal of ophthalmology.

[26]  P. Padmanabhan,et al.  Results of deep lamellar keratoplasty using the big-bubble technique in patients with keratoconus. , 2006, American journal of ophthalmology.

[27]  K. Tsubota,et al.  Same-Size Donor Corneas for Myopic Keratoconus , 2004, Cornea.

[28]  Catey Bunce,et al.  Comparison of deep lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus. , 2002, Ophthalmology.

[29]  K. Tsubota,et al.  Randomized clinical trial of deep lamellar keratoplasty vs penetrating keratoplasty. , 2002, American journal of ophthalmology.

[30]  Mohammed Anwar,et al.  Big‐bubble technique to bare Descemet's membrane in anterior lamellar keratoplasty , 2002, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[31]  Perry S Binder,et al.  A new surgical technique for deep stromal, anterior lamellar keratoplasty , 1999, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[32]  K. Tsubota,et al.  Intraoperative versus postoperative suture adjustment after penetrating keratoplasty. , 1998, Cornea.

[33]  D. Hodge,et al.  Ten-year postoperative results of penetrating keratoplasty. , 1998, Ophthalmology.

[34]  A. Loewenstein,et al.  Deep lamellar keratoplasty with complete removal of pathological stroma for vision improvement , 1998, The British journal of ophthalmology.