Ultrasonographic measurement of the mechanical properties of the sole under the metatarsal heads

The sole under the metatarsal heads functions as a shock absorber during walking and running. The mechanical properties of the sole provide the primary defense against the development of metatarsalgia and foot ulceration. However, limited information about these properties has been documented. In this study, we used ultrasonography to evaluate the mechanical properties, including unloaded thickness, compressibility index, elastic modulus, and energy dissipation ratio, of the sole in 20 healthy subjects. The unloaded thickness decreased progressively from the first to the fifth metatarsal heads, with values of 1.50, 1.36, 1.25, 1.14, and 1.04 cm. The sole under the first metatarsal head had the greatest values for the compressibility index and elastic modulus (55.9% and 1.39 kg/cm2), and the sole under the third metatarsal head had the smallest values (50.8% and 1.23 kg/cm2). The sole under the fifth metatarsal head had the greatest energy dissipation ratio (33.7%), followed by that under the third, second, first, and fourth metatarsal heads. Multivariate adjusted linear regression showed that the unloaded thickness, compressibility index, and elastic modulus values increased significantly with age and body weight (p < 0.05) and that the energy dissipation ratio increased significantly with body weight (p < 0.05).

[1]  F. Tang,et al.  Comparison of the mechanical properties of the heel pad between young and elderly adults. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  L T Cotton,et al.  Improved survival of the diabetic foot: the role of a specialized foot clinic. , 1986, The Quarterly journal of medicine.

[3]  J Ophir,et al.  Elastographic imaging of low-contrast elastic modulus distributions in tissue. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[5]  M. Stephens,et al.  Effect of Heel Height on Forefoot Loading , 1993, Foot & ankle.

[6]  K R Williams,et al.  The Effects of Wearing High Heeled Shoes on Pedal Pressure in Women , 1992, Foot & ankle.

[7]  R. Atkins,et al.  Heel-pad compressibility after calcaneal fractures: ultrasound assessment. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[8]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  In-Shoe Plantar Pressures During Activities of Daily Living: Implications for Therapeutic Footwear Design , 1996, Foot & ankle international.

[9]  G. Holmes Quantitative Determination of Intermetatarsal Pressure , 1992, Foot & ankle.

[10]  F Bojsen-Moller,et al.  Plantar aponeurosis and internal architecture of the ball of the foot. , 1976, Journal of anatomy.

[11]  J. Edelstein Foot care for the aging. , 1988, Physical therapy.

[12]  M. J. Muêller,et al.  Relationship of foot deformity to ulcer location in patients with diabetes mellitus. , 1990, Physical therapy.

[13]  Snow Re,et al.  High heeled shoes: their effect on center of mass position, posture, three-dimensional kinematics, rearfoot motion, and ground reaction forces. , 1994 .

[14]  T Brink Induration of the Diabetic Foot Pad: Another Risk Factor for Recurrent Neuropathic Plantar Ulcers - Verhärtung der diabetischen Fußsohle - eine Prädisposition für rezidivierende neuropathische Fußgeschwüre , 1995, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[15]  C. Grunfeld,et al.  Sonography of the sole of the foot. Evidence for loss of foot pad thickness in diabetes and its relationship to ulceration of the foot. , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[16]  C. Grunfeld,et al.  Heel pad thickness: determination by high‐resolution ultrasonography. , 1985, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.