Confocal Microscopy of Unfixed Breast Needle Core Biopsies: A Comparison to Fixed and Stained Sections

BackgroundNeedle core biopsy, often in conjunction with ultrasonic or stereotactic guided techniques, is frequently used to diagnose breast carcinoma in women. Confocal scanning laser microscopy (CSLM) is a technology that provides real-time digital images of tissues with cellular resolution. This paper reports the progress in developing techniques to rapidly screen needle core breast biopsy and surgical specimens at the point of care. CSLM requires minimal tissue processing and has the potential to reduce the time from excision to diagnosis. Following imaging, specimens can still be submitted for standard histopathological preparation.MethodsNeedle core breast specimens from 49 patients were imaged at the time of biopsy. These lesions had been characterized under the Breast Imaging Reporting And Data System (BI-RADS) as category 3, 4 or 5. The core biopsies were imaged with the CSLM before fixation. Samples were treated with 5% citric acid and glycerin USP to enhance nuclear visibility in the reflectance confocal images. Immediately following imaging, the specimens were fixed in buffered formalin and submitted for histological processing and pathological diagnosis. CSLM images were then compared to the standard histology.ResultsThe pathologic diagnoses by standard histology were 7 invasive ductal carcinomas, 2 invasive lobular carcinomas, 3 ductal carcinomas in-situ (CIS), 21 fibrocystic changes/proliferative conditions, 9 fibroadenomas, and 5 other/benign; two were excluded due to imaging difficulties. Morphologic and cellular features of benign and cancerous lesions were identified in the confocal images and were comparable to standard histologic sections of the same tissue.ConclusionCSLM is a technique with the potential to screen needle core biopsy specimens in real-time. The confocal images contained sufficient information to identify stromal reactions such as fibrosis and cellular proliferations such as intra-ductal and infiltrating carcinoma, and were comparable to standard histologic sections of the same tissue. Morphologic and cellular features of benign and cancerous lesions were identified in the confocal images. Additional studies are needed to 1.) establish correlation of the confocal and traditional histologic images for the various diseases of the breast; 2.) validate diagnostic use of CSLM and; 3.) further define features of borderline lesions such as well-differentiated ductal CIS vs. atypical hyperplasia.

[1]  Salvador Gonzalez,et al.  Confocal microscopy of excised human skin using acetic acid and crossed polarization: rapid detection of nonmelanoma skin cancers , 2000, Photonics West - Biomedical Optics.

[2]  Richard Rox Anderson Lasers in Surgery: Advanced Characterization, Therapeutics, and Systems VIII , 1995 .

[3]  Tao Xu,et al.  Gold-Based Nanoparticles for Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[4]  S. González,et al.  In Vivo Real‐Time Confocal Reflectance Microscopy: A Noninvasive Guide for Mohs Micrographic Surgery Facilitated by Aluminum Chloride, an Excellent Contrast Enhancer , 2003, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[5]  R. Anderson,et al.  A novel, noninvasive imaging technique for intraoperative assessment of parathyroid glands: confocal reflectance microscopy. , 2000, Surgery.

[6]  Karima K. Esmail,et al.  A changing paradigm [agile manufacturing] , 1996 .

[7]  M. Rajadhyaksha,et al.  Confocal examination of nonmelanoma cancers in thick skin excisions to potentially guide mohs micrographic surgery without frozen histopathology. , 2001, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[8]  A. Dunn,et al.  Near real time confocal microscopy of cultured amelanotic cells: sources of signal, contrast agents and limits of contrast. , 1998, Journal of biomedical optics.

[9]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Determination of the refractive index of highly scattering human tissue by optical coherence tomography. , 1995, Optics letters.

[10]  R. Webb,et al.  In vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy of human skin II: advances in instrumentation and comparison with histology. , 1999, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[11]  Milind Rajadhyaksha,et al.  Changing paradigms in dermatology: confocal microscopy in clinical and surgical dermatology. , 2003, Clinics in dermatology.

[12]  Stanislav Emelianov,et al.  Molecular specific optoacoustic imaging with plasmonic nanoparticles. , 2007, Optics express.

[13]  M. Freedman,et al.  Reflectance confocal microscopy for characterization of mammary ductal structures and development of neoplasia in genetically engineered mouse models of breast cancer. , 2005, Journal of biomedical optics.

[14]  R. Anderson,et al.  Evaluation of Morphology and Microcirculation of the Pancreas by ex vivo and in vivo Reflectance Confocal Microscopy , 2001, Pancreatology.

[15]  Zachary M. Eastman,et al.  Confocal mosaicing microscopy in Mohs skin excisions: feasibility of rapid surgical pathology. , 2008, Journal of biomedical optics.

[16]  M. Tilli,et al.  Comparison of mouse mammary gland imaging techniques and applications: Reflectance confocal microscopy, GFP Imaging, and ultrasound , 2008, BMC Cancer.

[17]  Minetta C. Liu,et al.  Real-time imaging and characterization of human breast tissue by reflectance confocal microscopy. , 2007, Journal of biomedical optics.

[18]  Salvador González,et al.  Evaluation of hepatic histology by near-infrared confocal microscopy: a pilot study. , 2002, Human pathology.