Efficacy and Safety of Vorapaxar in Patients With Prior Ischemic Stroke

Background and Purpose— Vorapaxar is an antiplatelet agent that antagonizes thrombin-mediated activation of the protease-activated receptor-1 on platelets. We tested the efficacy and safety of vorapaxar in a prespecified analysis in the stroke subcohort from a multinational, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Methods— We randomly assigned patients with prior atherothrombosis (myocardial infarction, peripheral artery disease, or ischemic stroke) to receive vorapaxar (2.5 mg daily) or placebo added to standard antiplatelet therapy. Patients who qualified with stroke (N=4883) had a history of ischemic stroke in the prior 2 weeks to 12 months. The primary end point was the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or any stroke. Results— The qualifying stroke was classified as large vessel in 35%, small vessel in 47%, and other/unknown in 18%. In the stroke cohort, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke through 3 years was not reduced with vorapaxar versus placebo (13.0% vs 11.7%; hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.85–1.25), including recurrent ischemic stroke (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.78–1.25). There were no significant differences in the effect of vorapaxar based on the type or timing of the qualifying stroke. Intracranial hemorrhage at 3 years was increased with vorapaxar (2.5% vs 1.0%; hazard ratio, 2.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.46–4.36). Conclusions— In patients with prior ischemic stroke who receive standard antiplatelet therapy, adding vorapaxar increased the risk of intracranial hemorrhage without an improvement in major vascular events, including ischemic stroke. These findings add to the accumulating evidence establishing important risks with combination antiplatelet therapy in patients with prior stroke. Clinical Trial Registration Information— http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00526474.

[1]  Marc P. Bonaca,et al.  Vorapaxar for secondary prevention of thrombotic events for patients with previous myocardial infarction: a prespecified subgroup analysis of the TRA 2°P-TIMI 50 trial , 2012, The Lancet.

[2]  C. Coffey,et al.  Effects of clopidogrel added to aspirin in patients with recent lacunar stroke. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  Y. Shinohara,et al.  Safety of the novel protease-activated receptor-1 antagonist vorapaxar in Japanese patients with a history of ischemic stroke. , 2012, Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association.

[4]  Marc P. Bonaca,et al.  Vorapaxar in the secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  E. Topol,et al.  Dual or Mono Antiplatelet Therapy for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials , 2012, Stroke.

[6]  Craig D Williams,et al.  Antithrombotics for secondary prevention of noncardioembolic ischaemic stroke , 2012, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[7]  Giuseppe Ambrosio,et al.  Thrombin-receptor antagonist vorapaxar in acute coronary syndromes. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Risk score to predict serious bleeding in stable outpatients with or at risk of atherothrombosis , 2010, European heart journal.

[9]  Marc P. Bonaca,et al.  Evaluation of a novel antiplatelet agent for secondary prevention in patients with a history of atherosclerotic disease: design and rationale for the Thrombin-Receptor Antagonist in Secondary Prevention of Atherothrombotic Ischemic Events (TRA 2 degrees P)-TIMI 50 trial. , 2009, American heart journal.

[10]  Marc P. Bonaca,et al.  SCH 530348: a novel oral thrombin receptor antagonist. , 2009, Future cardiology.

[11]  Vivian Gu,et al.  Aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole versus clopidogrel for recurrent stroke. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  E. Antman,et al.  Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  One-year cardiovascular event rates in outpatients with atherothrombosis. , 2007, JAMA.

[14]  H. Diener,et al.  Aspirin and clopidogrel compared with clopidogrel alone after recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack in high-risk patients (MATCH): randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial , 2004, The Lancet.

[15]  A. Algra,et al.  Dipyridamole and acetylsalicylic acid in the secondary prevention of stroke , 1997, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[16]  H. Diener,et al.  European Stroke Prevention Study 2. Dipyridamole and acetylsalicylic acid in the secondary prevention of stroke 1 1 ESPS-2 Writing Committee , 1996, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[17]  David Lee Gordon,et al.  Classification of Subtype of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Definitions for Use in a Multicenter Clinical Trial , 1993, Stroke.

[18]  A. Lowenthal The European Stroke Prevention Study , 1988, Acta neurologica Belgica.